Pros And Cons Of The RH Bill

“Senate Bill 4 is a piece of legislation that Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed in May and it aims to ban “sanctuary cities” by requiring sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and allows police to ask about the immigration status of individuals they lawfully detain” (Alvarez). The consequences for sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders if they do not follow the legislation are that they could face Class A misdemeanor and possibly jail time (Mansoor & Pollock). “In addition, they can could face civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 for the first violation and $25,000 to 25,500 for consecutive offenses” (Alvarez). Many people are against Senate

It can be concluded that Bill C-51 was not thought out in a proper professional manner which led to various concerns amongst people from within the parliament as well as citizens of Canada. It is extremely vital to make amendments to the Bill because doing so will give the people more confidence in the system and in our government. Eliminating all the confusion created within the Bill is the right way forward, however the Ministries should ensure that the safety of its people come first, yet at the same time given their basic human rights. It can be a difficult situation to amend a Bill such as Bill C-51 since it is on a very fragile topic. Facing criticism Hence Trudeau's government will have to be extremely careful handling the Bill, keeping

Missouri House Bill 1468, removes the need for an individual to have a permit for a conceal-and-carry firearm. This bill was sponsored by Eric Burlison, a Republican, who is the current representative for District 133 in the Missouri House of Representatives. Before this bill, any resident of Missouri who is at least 19 years old, or any military member who is at least 18 years old, must apply for a permit that costs $100 as well as complete an eight-hour long firearms safety course (Bliss). Even with the addition of this bill, it is still forbidden to carry a firearm in the following places: schools, governmental buildings, private property that restricts firearms, and many other places. It also is illegal for domestic violence offenders

I strongly support H.R. 1602 that will allow a nurse to object taking on more patients, without repercussion, when meeting the minimum nurse-to-patient ratio per unit per hospital’s approved staffing plan by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Minister of Justice Robert Douglas Nicholson originally introduced Bill C-51 in the House of Commons on November 1st 2010. The purpose of the bill was to modernize and update Canadian criminal laws by facilitating collaboration with foreign and domestic law-enforcement agency to address organize crime and monitor terrorist activity (Valiquet, 2011 p. 5-13). Following the parliament shooting in Ottawa, the bill was passed by the senate and received Royal assent on June 18 2015 (Sokolyk, 2015 p. 41). Supporter of the bill and CSIS director Michel Coulombe, recently stated that the bill “have been used nearly two dozen times since last autumn to disrupt terrorist threats” (MacCharles, 2015).

Controversy has presented its self over a newly introduced bill known as Bill C-51. Inside its contents there are drastic changes to be implemented into Canadian Law and Canada’s national security. Many of these changes show little regard for the rights and freedoms of Canadians. The vague language of the Bill is concerning for the public, as it contains the word “may” which is open to interpretation. The Bill would allow CSIS to arrest people it suspects “may” commit terrorist acts, opposed to “will”, allowing the government to decide what they deem as not appropriate.

Not everyone like the superintendents are for Senate Bill 1. Some people oppose the bill because they do not like it. There are many reasons why people would vote for the bill along with many reasons that someone may oppose the bill too. But the ultimate goal of this bill is to “raise each one of Illinois’ 860-plus school districts to individual adequacy targets—or the amount of money needed to properly educate every student—through increased funding from the state” (Masterson). But getting to this point has a lot of controversy. One of the major factors that people may not like this bill is that they don’t want to bailout the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago Public Schools are the only school district in the state providing

The Georgia State Senate passed an amended version of a religious freedom bill on Friday.

In Ohio there are many problems that people come encounter with. Some of those issues may be minor while others are life threatening. Regardless if the issue is minor or major, people would like to see a change. One issue in particular that has become an important issue to the state of Ohio is the misunderstanding of an imitation firearm to an authentic one. To fix this problem, House Bill 16 was introduced to the committee to regulate imitation firearms. This bill is to protect those who are innocent and those who are in an authoritative position to not mistake it for an authentic one. In many cases imitation guns have been the cause of deaths, especially to younger children who are the ones that have it in possession. This is issue is not only a problem in the state of Ohio but all over the nation. It easy to mistaken the two guns, one real and the other fake. So in doing so, this bill that is currently still introduced to the committee should be taken into action and enrolled. However, with doing that can bring about some disadvantages, especially with big business and manufacturers that create these guns, but the argument of each citizen's life seems to be more in a reasonable favor.

The Bill of Rights was created for every citizen to have their rights of life, liberty, and property to be protected from the government. It makes people feel like they are not being controlled and that they have individuality and freedoms. This is very important in our country that was founded by people looking for freedom.

To prevent the right of freedom from being taken away, we must result to better habits that will save lives and the state of humanity. Everyone should take in account of the adverse effects and the things we may lose if the baby-having trend continues. It’s more than right of freedom being taken away, but the things we use to function as a society. It should be an initiative taken by the government to educate those who are not aware the effects of people excessively having children. In good essence government control may be the end result to alleviate the issues that may arrive if the continuing of planned or unplanned births remains

I believe that my side, which is against the “balance budget amendment”, has week arguments. The article does not provide any arguments based on facts, but instead speculations and opinions. The author discusses many negative outcomes that this amendment would have on the stimulus the government provides and efficiency of the economy, despite that his rationale behind these arguments is reasonable he does not provide historical examples, statistics, etc.

The outcomes of this legislation had many pros and cons many of which more serious than others for their own reasons. Some of the cons of this legislation are for one the immigrants had no right to a hearing in the court and had no right of evidence. Also, it was considered as unconstitutional according to the Republicans. Finally, another big part of this legislation is that it hindered freedom of speech and freedom of the press because some people were arrested when they spoke out against these acts or made journal articles bashing the Federalists. Some of the pros of this legislation passing somewhat came from the cons, for example, all the people who were arrested under this act were pardoned by the new president which was Thomas Jefferson.

In RA 10354 otherwise known as the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012. There are pros and cons in this RA. Let me first tackle about the pros, it has a gender equality of both man and woman. The rights of a couple in building a family. And it’s ideal family size. This law suggests that abortion is illegal and punishable by law. And the law has a BEMONC and CEMONC it refers to lifesaving services for emergency maternal and newborn children’s conditions/complications. It also has a right of a couple whether to have a child or not. The most helpful in dealing expenses is having a PHILHEALTH program.It’s also a must to have a sex and health education which students must know what is right and wrong, it also has a sexual

In his article “Solving the Human Predicament” he proposes that a possible solution would be “empowering women and providing family planning services to all sexually active people” (557). However, results would take decades until they become evident. If the solution in this article is implemented, results will be apparent almost instantly. Ehrlich solution would also require an unknown amount of resources, whereas this solution would finance itself, due to the proposed fine.