Pros And Cons Of The SAT

Standardized testing is an unfair way to judge how these students are making progress. Simply, some students do not test as well as other students do. There could be a very smart student that simply can not do well on test for whatever the reason may be, but the sad thing is we allow this to continue happening even when its totally unfair. Most of the time, students that come from a low-income family are treated the most unfairly. They attended poorly-funded schools with large class sizes, too many teachers without subject area certification, and inadequate books, laboratories and so on. States don’t put these schools into consideration that they don’t have the best education system. Instead, they continue to take it out on the students and deny them diplomas because of them not being about to afford a highly-funded school.

Standardized tests are often unfair to a wide range of students. Students coming from high-poverty schools often have fewer resources and weaker teachers (Layton A1). “People are sick of the overkill of test volume and the consequences, ridiculous things like rating art teachers based on the reading test scores in their schools” quote Robert Schaeffer (Layton A1). “Fort Myers, Florida, gives 183 tests during the year!” quote Sen. Patty Murray (Layton A1). There is many ways students can be evaluated more

Imagine a test capable of making or breaking a student's chances of getting into his or her dream college. Imagine a test score that can be easily influenced, but only through thousands of dollars worth of coaching. Now imagine that same test but biased towards certain crowds of students while also being incapable of accurately predicting their futures. Is this the test you want for colleges to use in order to distinguish students? This is the SAT—famous for the unnecessary pressure it presents to students as well as the unfair disadvantages it presents to many others. Since these SAT scores are extremely artificial, SAT tests are not an accurate predictor for future success.

If this is true and GPA and school activity involvement are more important, then why is the SAT even considered? Brandon Busteed, an executive director of Gallup Education, ran a study including 2,586 superintendents around his area. According to his results, “...Only six percent of superintendents strongly agree that SAT and ACT scores are the best predictors of college success” (Brandon Busteed).  This shows that even educators feel that the SAT lacks a true purpose. How can any college determine a student's study habits, work ethic, or community involvement through a number? Jennifer Finney Boylan, a professor at Colby College, states, “The only way to measure students’ potential is to look at the complex portrait of their lives; what their schools are like; how they’ve done in their courses; what they’ve chosen to study; what progress they’ve made over time; how they’ve reacted to adversity” (Hambrick & Chabris). Although other factors are not ignored, including involvement and high school GPA, there is still immense pressure to do well on the SATs. Busteed states, “We’re not just overinvesting in standardized testing, we’re actually testing standardization. That is to say, most standardized tests are designed to have students come up with the same answers. We’re teaching them how to be similar, not different” (2015). This shows the negative effects that the SAT has on

Most top-tier universities use SAT and/or ACT test scores as an important factor when considering students for admissions. A perfect score is a great aid in helping an applicate standout in a highly competitive arena. Because the test scores are so important, many students begin preparation in the 8th or 9th grade and continue it throughout their high school years. Today, that prep is even more significant due to redesigned SAT, which many consider a harder test than its predecessor.

Standardized tests are biased to certain students whether it is race, or even how much money the parent(s) earn. According to Standardized Testing and Its Victims by Alfie Kohn, the tests are a lot easier for children coming from richer communities like Dublin for example,

“The research shows that compared to the national standardized tests, the SAT and ACT, a high school GPA is much better at predicting a student's cumulative GPA in college and a student's chances at completing college,” says Wendy Lecker, journalist of Stamford Advocate. She agrees that standardized tests should not determine a student’s future based on how well they scored. Because of this, some colleges have even started making the tests optional to

Generally speaking, the SAT is a one-day test where students are forced to test in specific areas such as math, reading and writing in an allotted time period. An individual’s success cannot be measured by a snapshot of time. Many believe that time does not help reflect a student’s overall performance because there are multiple of variables that can happen throughout the time period and day to that individual. In addition, the SAT testing does not take into account other academic areas that a student may excel in. While a student’s GPA on their transcript can show administrators the student’s strengths and weakness since it reflects an accumulative of four years in high school, thus it is able to better represent a student’s academic

The SAT is a standardized test which over a million students take per year. This test supposedly was made to determine, approximately, how well freshmen in college will do. Although, studies have shown only twenty five percent of test takers scores actually match their grades (O'Shaughnessy). The SAT is unnecessary and unfair for students applying for college because it prevents diversity in schools and big businesses only care about the profit from the test.

Standardized testing does not give equal opportunities to students of color and non english speakers in America. There is a small amount of color students that excel in these types of tests a small amount of color students pass the exams, it is unfair for them because a lot of students of color are english learners for example the latinos and Native Americans and most of the time they are expected to take these

If one student is financially stable and can afford to take classes for that specific test, then he/she has the opportunity to achieve a higher score. Although, if a student doesn’t have the financial abilities to pay for classes then he/she will end up not learning the test taking skills that standardized testing teachers are specifically paid to teach. Because a student has money to take classes, it doesn’t really show his/her true capabilities. However, on record it doesn’t show if a student was able to take specific classes.” Students from low-income and minority-group backgrounds, English language learners, and students with disabilities, are more likely to be denied diplomas, retained in grade, placed in a lower track, or unnecessarily put in remedial education programs.” (Schaeffer) These are the effects of having standardized testing that doesn’t accurately measure a student’s

SAT is one of the most important of any teenager in high school. The SAT determines the fields of college admission and higher education. Moderate of student get into this $500 dollars program for 5 years to study for the SAT. This program helps a student get 1600 on the SAT. That 1600 includes math, reading, and writing. If you get a 800 on everything, then you might just get a scholarship. However, I believe that the SAT is not an accurate valid test for students. Many students have the knowledge to pass, but can also stress about it so much that it messes with them during the test. Also, I don’t think the SAT should affect whether you go into a good college or not. Yet, many student believe that this is their only shoot into

The College Boared believs that this SAT tests students potential by their revisions made on the exam. The College Board carefully went through each section and displayed information relevant to the workplace and college studies. These revisions include taking away a students calculator on the math portion, or even testing students on historical american figures. All in all, the new SAT is displayued with a purpose behind each and every question. The old SAT was tricky and really is hard for students who don’t test well. According to Atkinson and Geiser, “the exam will be a more straightforward test of material that students encounter in the classroom(Atkinson and Geiser). The exam being straight forward is more fair for

When you take a standardized test, you can show colleges what you are capable of. If you were taking a test that decided whether or not you went to your dream college, you would want to do the best you could, right? Showing what you can do on these tests are very important because it can determine whether or not you get into the school you want. Having said this, in order for you to show colleges what you can do, you have to do your best on the tests. Colleges use the test scores to award scholarships to students with a high enough score. Not only is your

Scoring a 1580 on the SAT and 35 on the ACT would grant a free pass to any of the Ivy League schools, but that’s just one of the requirements to be accepted. There’s others things, such as volunteering, GPA, sports, clubs, extracurriculars, and much, much more that colleges tend to look at when guaranteeing admission. But, the main crisis that needs to be looked upon is, whether standardized testing is effective in education, in which case, it is. Standardized testing is given to every state, where students are given the same questions on a test, but is tested by their individual ability to use their knowledge of learning to answer each question. In which, colleges would be able to compare each student by their score, received by a simple statistical