Pros And Cons Of Unitary Government

The biggest advantage of federal system is check and balances – a political system where each branch of government have authority to keep checks on other branches and to influence the decisions of other branches; the political power is not concentrated in the hands of individuals or groups. Now, let’s see the cons of the federal system. Cons of the federal system are: prevention of the creation of a national policy, lack of accountability, and potential for corruption. “Federalism also causes confusion between the local governments and the national government as well.” (Federalism Pros and Cons List, 2015) For an example, the United State doesn’t have a single policy on issues, which often leads to the confusion. Also, power of authority can create a possible atmosphere for corruption at local and national level. For an example, if majority of the congress wants to pass a law on something and local states do not agree on it, then the local government can agree on the law to get something in return in form of money or favors!

In the Unites States of America Federalism is the basic structure of the American government; it is the distribution and balance of powers between the National government and the States government. In order to obtain a compromise between those who wanted stronger state government and those who preferred a stronger national government the founding fathers arranged and settled for a federal system rather than the alternatives of a unitary or confederal system. While both National and State governments each have specific powers and authority, they also share certain powers and must be able to cooperate effectively with each other.

I agree with federalism because it ensures that one group never has too much power. Additionally, different states may have different values or needs and should be able to adopt their own policies. The structure of the legal systems ensures that no one branch has unlimited power and allows the three branches to keep each other in check. The organization of the American legal system is both diverse and unified at the same time.

People have been arguing for years about who should have more power, either the federal government or the state. People arguing that the states should have more power than the government because they care more about the people. Then other people will say that the federal should have majority of the power since they oversee everything the states do. I believe that the federal government and the state government should have shared power, but I think the federal government should have the powers such as declaring war and things to help the people as a whole. Then the states should have the power to do what they think is the best things for the people of their state.

Federalism guards against tyranny by dividing the power between central and state governments. Some powers given to the central government are to regulate trade, to declare war, and etc. Powers given to the state government are to hold elections, establish schools, and etc. Both the state and central governments check each other to make sure one doesn’t get too much power.

Federalism is a fervently debated idea in which two parties, the Federalists, and the Anti-Federalists, argue whether or not the Constitution should be ratified. The main writers of the Federalists Papers include three Founding Fathers by the names of James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The Federalists wrote of the need for a strong central government and a constitution, however, the Anti-Federalists sought for a guarantee of freedom with a Bill of Rights. The Constitution required a Bill of Rights in order to limit the large authoritative power of central government and to protect the voice of the common man from oppression. Federalist Paper Number 84, written, by Alexander Hamilton, focused on the concept of a Constitution and the containment of a Bill

When the constitution was written, it was written so that the President of the United States is not chosen through a national popular vote, but through an electoral college, which gives each state as many votes as it has members of Congress. The system was created as a middle ground in order to keep voting fair, and to balance between congress voting and the people. Federalism has been a way to help control the abuse of power. Flexibility allows the government to work with the different traditions, and religions of people, and allows the states to develop their own policies without putting the whole country at risk. Citizens are also given the opportunity in running the government, and making contributions.

Federalism has played a large role in our government since the time that the Constitution was ratified. It originally gave the majority of the power to the states. As time went on, the national government gained more and more power. It used the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution to validate its acts, and the Supreme Court made decisions that strengthened the national government creating a more unified United States. Finally, the recent course of federalism has been to give powers back to the states.

I would done this because I think the anti-federalist’s idea of government is unsustainable and weak. The anti-federalist view is anchored on the notion of giving the local governments more power, or devolving power. I believe the people need rights and a sense of efficacy, but what happens when a foreign nation attacks? How will the United States defend itself effectively and efficiently? Another problem that arises is how to regulate the printing of money. How would the dollar have a cohesive use? If not, how would its value be measured? The third question that is brought up is diplomacy. Who speaks on behalf of the United States? How will the states present itself to a possible trade partner or ally? All these faults are highlighted in the Articles of Confederation, a document in which many anti-federalists views are shown. The results of this old constitution are displayed in Shay’s Rebellion, after which, many people questioned the real power of the United States. “We have felt the feebleness of the ties by which these United-States are held together, and the want of sufficient energy in our present confederation, to manage, in some instances, our general concerns.” (Brutus I) This shows the faults of the Anti-Federalist’s argument for the structure of our government. As I federalist, I believe in giving states and federal governments power. This could be the only way

Federalism, the separation of power, checks and balances, and giving equal representation to both small and large states helped save our government from the hands of absolute power. The federal principle or system of government prevented our government from plunging into the depths of tyranny. Federalism divided the powers between the central and state governments to prevent dictatorship from happening. As James Madison says in Document A of the Constitution, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”

After the Articles of Confederation failed, a system called federalism was proposed. This system would allow for the state governments to share power with the federal government. Neither states nor the federal authorities would have too much power under the proposed structure of federalism, with hopes this would lead to cooperation, efficiency and a unified approach to governing. Under federalism, certain matters would be decided by the final word of the national government, while states would be allowed to develop policies pertaining to matters within their

Federalism is a division of government, this style of order guards against tyranny by not giving one government too much power to rule over the whole country. Federalism divided the government into two so one government wouldn’t have all of the power.“The different government would control each other, at the same times that each will he controlling itself.” This quote states that not too much power is given to both governments, their power is evenly balanced. Although there are differences on their power. This quote shows that federalism guard against tyranny by giving each government the same amount of powerful actions. “...is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion alloted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This argument proves that each government only got the powers they were meant to have. Each powers the government got was on purpose, so they don't abuse their

Federalism helps protect the U.S from tyranny by making sure that the National and State governments do not step out of line. “Different governments will each control each other, at the same times that each will be controlled by itself.” ( Madison, Document A ). This quote proves that the government will control each other to make sure one doesn’t get too much power. Some examples of this are that only the National government can declare war, States government

Federalism is a mix of the central government and the states into one political system. The central government would have one role while the states have another. Additionally, federalism allows the central government and the states to share their powers. (Doc A) Federalism ensures the separation of powers and prevent tyranny. Even if one were have all the power of the branches of the federal government, federalism ensures that the central government and the states would still function independently. The central government would be the one that regulates trade while the states would be the one that establishes the schools. No matter what, the central government and the states help fulfill the needs that can benefit the nation in whole. Dividing powers and giving different responsibilities between the central government and the states is one way that the Constitution did to prevent

Since the birth of the United States, the issue over how strong the national government should be has always been a controversial one. While some believe that decentralization will inevitably lead to chaos, others contend that a powerful central government will inevitably become a tyranny. Although the United States would wholeheartedly embrace the idea of a loose alliance of independent states at first, the many glaring problems that the nation faced under the Articles of Confederation would quickly change the minds of many Americans. Indeed, the nation 's confederation system of government was eventually rejected and replaced by federalism, a political philosophy that calls for a sharing of power between the national government and the