Pros And Cons Of Universal Health Care In The United States

           In a country where healthcare is a decision, many debate if our country should keep our health care system privatized. Health care is an essential need in society because individual health can change at any time without warning at any time. While there are both pros and cons of this system, the pros outway the cons. I believe that our nation should ensure basic health care to all legal citizens, no matter the class. Many Americans fall into circumstances where they are not able to pay the expensive bills that privatized insurance companies billhave so they do not have chose to not have insurance at all. Universal health care gives those people the means of financial support when they medically need

1. Its unfortunate when reading the text you realize how much the country you live in is lagging behind so many others in healthcare. Japan, Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom all provide universal healthcare for their citizens, something that the United States does not do, yet we spend some much more on healthcare than those nations.

Brian became aware of his testicular cancer five years ago. Despite insurance, Brian still owed thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs. Over the course of three years, he built relationships with nurses, doctors, and the hospital staff during treatments and follow up appointments. Without warning or explanation, the insurance company no longer accepted his hospital as a provider under their plans. He doubted any other hospital staff could provide the physical and emotional support his previous providers gave and wondered how to replace the people who had been there during the toughest times of his life (Salmon). The current health care system in America affects people physically, emotionally, and financially. “Costs are enormous, yet Americans do not fare better, and often fare worse, than citizens in countries which spend substantially less on health care” (Cicconi).

America is split in two, with one group of people saying that a universal healthcare system would benefit greatly. while the opposition claims that a universal healthcare system would do more harm than good. Both sides use rhetorical devices such as pathos and logos to prove their claim. this is done by introducing things such as world rankings and potential events that could happen.

Many Americans try to find reasons to why we may or may not have universal health care for all. Although the pro and cons list go on and on, it is understood that health care is and should be treated as a priority. It is a basic need of each person not only in the US but around the world. Despite gender, race, sexual orientation and most importantly age universal or single player health care is considered the best option for everyone. However, the debate amongst government officials is whether we employ a single player health care system or an overall universal health care system. Both systems would benefit Americans especially those who struggle to keep paying for a law that is required but maybe not so desired or financially beneficial for everyone. Being able to be realistic about this necessity becomes hazy even more so as the actual demand for professional medical associates and their services will surely increase, while the salary and compensation of those employed in this field will ultimately suffer.

Universal healthcare seems like a good thing at face value . Liberal politicians can quote statistics all day, but these can be misleading. One way to find the truth is to examine the diseases instead of the statistics. One must also evaluate the ease of access to medical treatment. You can evaluate the amount of finances socialized countries spend on insurance programs. There is also a biblical argument involved. If you really look at the full picture, universal health care will negatively impact the lives of the citizens of the United States of America.

Another argument that deters the idea of Universal Healhcare is the increase on taxes and general cost to the average American. Yes, taxes will increase but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing when looking at the broad picture and future generations. Much like how our current taxes are being used for security, schools, libraries, parks, road safety and even wars, it may be to our benefit to have healthcare included. This idea provides us, Americans, with coverage ranging from a common cold to lengthy hospital

Universal healthcare would make it so people who can not afford to visit the doctors would be able to get proper treatment and the effective help they need to keep themselves healthy. From sources “They argue that a right to health care would stop medical bankruptcies, improve public health, reduce overall health care spending, help small businesses, and that health care should be an essential government service.” (https://healthcare.procon.org/ par 2) Hawaii has had universal health care since 1974 and has been doing great. Only about 60% of businesses in colorado offer insurance for health care causing a lot of people to have no insurance. With more people who can’t afford the cost of healthcare won’t be able to get the help that their health needs and relies on.

Canadians have been involved in a great controversy between the Americans over their ways of dealing with healthcare for many generations. The Canadians believe universal healthcare is best whereas the Americans believe that Private healthcare is what’s best. The easiest way to decipher who is most reasonable between these two faces of healthcare is to look at the Universal health care in Canada on its own, the Private healthcare in America, then an assessment to bring the two to opposed sides to a reasonable conclusion. Thus hopefully making a well-balanced decision.

The United States should have Universal healthcare system. Everyone having healthcare can improve the United States medical field and increase life expectancy. If everyone is covered under the same healthcare then that would mean that everyone will be equal. No more fights about unequal healthcare. It will decrease the number of homeless citizens. Some of the homeless is homeless because health made them unable to work. No matter the social status, everyone should have healthcare.

As of right now, there are not enough physicians who could meet the demand that would correlate with universal health care (Debellis, 2008). This would also lead to longer wait lines due to the inability to tend to patients in a reasonable amount of time (Pros & Cons of Universal Health Care, 2017). Overall, the cons are not very enticing and in my opinion, vastly outweigh the

It would be great if the Govt. could provide complete Universal Health Insurance to all citizens, plus allow the free market to enable those of us who work for a living to earn/pay for the best doctors and service available. So the question, is should the Government provide free Universal Health Insurance to all Americans. The answer to this question is “Yes” the government should provide free Universal Health Insurance because:

The role of the United States government is to protect and care for the people of this county, just like a mom cares for her children. The mother does not favor one child over the other and treats them equally. If the U.S government is like our mother, then why do we have some people with health care and some without? Universal Healthcare solves that problem. Universal Healthcare is a system that provides coverage to all citizens of an individual country. This is the perfect example of how the government would take care of everyone. So, why is this not in place? That is a great question, and here are a few reasons why we should prefer universal health care over the current health care system in the U.S.

Universal Healthcare is a viable alternative for the United States. Health insurance is supposed to keep you from an unexpected cost that you can’t pay right then and there. With health insurance you can be seen whenever you need to be seen and have a consistent doctor. There is a federal state program called Medicaid. Medicaid is for people with limited income, but not all people qualify. Depending if you qualify for Medicaid deals with your age or if you’re pregnant or have any disabilities. There is another federal state program, which is called State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). This is similar to Medicaid, but it is for children whose parents don’t have enough money to pay for private insurance and also makes too much money to qualify for Medicaid. Now there is also Medicare, which is for the people who are over 65.

On March 23, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed by President Obama, raising the question for many of whether this new law was going to be more helpful or hurtful. With universal healthcare, healthcare coverage would be increased tremendously, costs would be reduced, jobs would be created, and consumers would be protected. Conversely, it will also raise taxes and wait times, lead to a smaller number of doctors, and infringe on some employers’ 1st amendment rights. Presenting both arguments for and against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allows one to draw a conclusion on whether the new program will benefit or hinder the citizens of the United States.