Pros And Cons Of Whaling Controversy In Norway And Japan

889 Words4 Pages
Whaling Controversy in Norway and Japan

For centuries nations across the globe have hunted a variety of animals to provide for their inhabitants’ diets and economies, which for some species has resulted in endangerment or extinction. Several species of whale have become endangered because of the process of whale hunting, and in order to combat excessive whale hunting the International Whaling Comission (IWC) set forth a ban in 1986 to halt the whaling industry (International Whaling Comission, n.d.); however, nations such as Norway and Japan insisted that their practices continue on the basis of cultural exception. The economies of their whaling regions, they argued, would be put into danger by the moratorium, and so the nations have been allowed to continue hunting small amounts of the non-endangered winke whales and, in some cases, fin whales. As whaling is an important part of the coastal economies for certain countries, the nations certainly have a right to attempt a case of cultural exemption. Without whaling certain villages could lose most of
…show more content…
This can be done through two main forces: through putting a hard limit on the amount of whales and types of whales to be hunted and through requiring scientists to monitor whale populations in the areas. The first limit will keep whaling industries in check by making sure that they can still provide income for their workers while protecting whale populations. Also, it will mean that a quota cannot be surpassed, so only a small amount of whales can be hunted. Also, biologists and conservationists should definitely be involved to make sure that quotas are not too high. Quotas which are too high would result in hunting whales faster than the populations can reproduce, causing a threat to the whale populations and the surrounding ecosystems, and so they must be monitored

    More about Pros And Cons Of Whaling Controversy In Norway And Japan

      Open Document