Pros and Cons of Single-Sex School on Students

Mention separating students and putting them in same sex classrooms or even schools guarantees an uproar, however what most students don’t realize is that when making the great divide it actually creates a better learning environment and it unlocks opportunities for their future. Of course students will need time to adapt and most should take into consideration that just because they’re put into different classrooms doesn’t mean that their grades will automatically be golden. This approach is taken to understand the different learning styles of the male and female. With this, new lesson plans will be able to be assembled to suit their divergent needs.

There was a girl name Maria who went to a Co-ed school for boys and girls. She was unhappy that she couldn’t concentrate in class because of all the drama and socializing between boys and girls. Then one day Maria look up the differences between Co-ed schools and Single-gender schools. Maria found that children who go to Single-Gender schools learn and get better grades than children who go to Co-ed schools. There are many differences between Single-Sex schools and Co-ed schools. Co-ed schools are the mixing of boys and girls. But, Single-Sex schools are the separation of boys and girls. Some advocates or educators thinks Single-Sex schools are better than Co-ed schools and others do not. The separation of girls and boys can lead to better grades, less distractions and more focus in class.

There are multiple reasons why Kelley King, Michael Gurian and Kathy Stevens are on the pro side. For one reason, they believe that the differences exist due to boys being more interactive with certain topics and methods that don’t usually interest girls or vice versa. For example, the Wamsley Elementary School in Rifle, Colorado has both boy and girl students. However, in the past, the girl students over accomplished the boy students due to the school staff being more experienced in understanding how to teach girls than understanding how to teach boys. So, the school focused on teaching the boys with their own learning styles that are also girl friendly such as online courses. The result of this was successful as boys became more accomplished than they were from before. (Pages 147 – 148).

When it comes to the classroom, there are several differences between girls and boys. There are physical differences in the way their brains work, differences in the room temperature that is best for boys and girls, and differences in how girls and boys respond to various tones of speech (Sax, 2006). While girls prefer soft-spoken teachers, Sax (2006) notes that boys prefer to be spoken to “loudly and in short, direct sentences with clear instructions” (p. 195). According to Sax (2006), “the ideal ambient temperature for boys is about 69 degrees and about 75 degrees for girls” (p. 193-194). Further differences involve how boys and girls learn. McNeil states that “boys may learn better under pressure and when allowed to move around...while girls may perform better in group situations and with a lot of encouragement” (McNeil, 2008). Because of these many differences, it would stand to reason that boys and girls would benefit from being in separate classrooms. According to Hughes (2007), “the teacher would be able to concentrate on the learning-styles of each sex and use the styles to bring out the academic best in each students. Lessons and activities could be designed with a single-sex in mind” (p. 11). As Principal John Fox states, “the single-sex environment enables you to actually focus on the particular needs of each gender, and those needs socially and

Imagine that you were in a classroom full of your gender how would you feel? Well, if you feel that you're not ok with that well, In school year 2004-05 122 public schools offered single sex classes and 34 public schools were single sex classes mandatory according to “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Close to 70% of kids in single sex classes raised their math and reading scores in “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Although this may seem bad and shouldn't happen it's really not. Kids in single sex classes will have more of a chance to succeed than students in non single sex class because of most kids have no problem with this in their school, less discipline, and most of all higher grades.

Did you know that single-sex classrooms are the worst classes ever? Over the past decade, single-gender classrooms have been opened in at least 230 schools in the rural, suburban, and the urban areas. Single-gender classrooms are classrooms where either young girls’ are in one class together, or young boys are in another class together. Single-sex classrooms were created because studies showed that boys and girls learn differently and they could benefit from being in a classroom with peers to whom they can relate. Since 2008, single-gender education has been the key to improved educational performance among boys and girls throughout the years. Today, gender differences among girls and boys are steadily rising in the classrooms they are in,

Or have a lack of knowledge about how some things should or should not work, since most homes force the toys, movies, etc. of their gender on them. And school is very much the only time some of them will experience the truth until adulthood. Making it more difficult to work in the real world as contributing member of society. As Rebecca Bigler and Lise Eliot of The Washington Posts ‘The case against single-sex schooling’ say,” Research on peer relations indicates that children who interact mostly with the same gender peers develop increasingly narrow skill sets and interest. For example, boys who spend more time with other boys become increasingly aggressive; girls who spend more time with girls become more sex-typed in their play.” The research done has proven that they will have a hard time coping in the real world with their narrow skill sets and interest. And that they will grow into a gender stereotype, instead of developing into their own person. They will continue to think only the small of themselves for the reason that they know no other way. From a young age the girls never experienced the “boyish” things and the boys never did the “girly” things, so their eyes are not open to the possibilities of all the can, and will, achieve if they

Recently single-sex schools have made a comeback, and this has raised the question of whether they are better than coeducational schools. In single-sex educational systems, male and female students are separated and taught in different school buildings or classrooms. In a historical point of view, only boys were given the opportunity to pursue formal education in the United States. Schools for women began to spread in the beginning of the nineteenth century, almost one hundred years before they were granted the right to vote. By the end of the twentieth century coeducational schooling had reached all elementary and secondary schools

Until the 20th century, education in the United States was gender-specific. Coeducation progressively came into the American educational landscape in the late 1800s, and since that time, same-sex education primarily has been confined to exclusive and denominational schools. Beginning in 2002, after the No Child Left Behind Act was passed, single-sex education has been growing in popularity. According to the National Association for Single Sex Public Education, the United States has over 95 single-sex public schools and more than 445 public coed schools offer single-sex classrooms (Novotney, Amy). With the popularity on the rise, many questions have been asked as to whether this divide in the classroom is academically ailing to a child’s learning or if it is not. By examining the successes of single-sex classrooms, school districts and parent’s can more fully understand that single-sex classes can implement changes to enhance students learning abilities.

Many proponents of single sex schools say that kids develop their mind and brain better, but actually this is actually false, and in truth kids develop better in co education. In a Washington Post article, “the idea that kids develop social skills better is laughable to many leading neuroscientist and behavior specialists”. When children are put into classes together, the social interaction stimulates the mind to grow, and prepares them for the real world.

Juliet Williams, UCLA Department of Gender Studies professor, calls out LAUSD for nonresponsive action to results that suggest sex segregated schools not only don’t improve students performances, but also stunts certain necessary social and learning abilities, in the Los Angeles Times article “What's wrong with single-sex schools? A lot.” She begins exposing underlying sexist and racist motivations for sex-separated schools and proceeds to explain that the segregation supports generalization about differences between the sexes, which Williams suggests is common among school practices. Williams continues, admitting that the schools provide opportunities for smaller class sizes as well as allow for “strong mentoring relationships”, although she finds fault with the overall lack of evidence that single-sex education improve student’s performances. Ultimately, the author is exposing injustices in single-sex education in the hopes of not only motivating LAUSD, but also educate parents in the hopes of gathering a larger concerned

In today’s society the word gender has once again regained its popularity among the media. A single gender class or school is one that contains learners of a single sex as opposed to coeducational classes or schools. It is possible to have a coeducational school with single gender classes. The percentage of coeducational classes and schools is far more dominant than that of single gender classes and schools in the nation. While it is clear that the preference among the nation is coeducational schools there have been numerous schools that are on the raise to establish single gender schools especially after 2006 when a few restrictions on Title IX have been lifted. Title IX permits for single sex schools but have a small exception for single gender classrooms within coeducational school. The exceptions must be met with appropriate justifications. The 2006 loosen restrictions must not

Critics often accuse single-sex education of reinforcing gender stereotypes; however, single-sex schools breakdown gender stereotypes by eliminating both gender intensification and gender gaps. Without the pressures and standards of genders present in coeducational institutions, single-sex schools allow students to explore their skills and interests. Research regarding interest in school subjects of the different genders conducted in 1990, demonstrates the gender-typical preferences of subjects between coeducational and single-sex facilities (Sax). Boys in coeducational schools tended to prefer masculine subjects such as math and science and disliked feminine subjects such as

Although single-sex schools have good intentions, separating the two sexes would leave the door open for more stereotypes and prejudice to rise within children. Rebecca Bingler, a psychologist at the University of Texas, as well as other psychologists and pediatricians argue, that segregating people based on their biological anatomy increases the risk of prejudice based on stereotypes. Many people believe that separating the sexes would be an opportunity for girls and boys to blossom in a classroom environment. Despite their intentions being innocent, these single sex schools supporters are too narrow minded and can’t see the bigger picture Rebecca Bingler is trying to address. People say there are too many stereotypes between the two sexes,

Many people might say the single sex schools are ineffective, because girls and boys need to know how to communicate with the opposite sex. They should be enforced to help children reach their full dreams without the thought of humility standing in their way. School is a place where students get acquainted with the basics of the life, which further helps them to foster their proficiency level in different aspects of life required in this competitive world, and the most important part of school is not where students get time to socialize with each other. Although Co-ed schools are a first choice for most adolescents and their parents, Single sex schools are equally good. In single sex schools, students don't have to worry about sexual