Pros and Cons of the Iq Test Essay

There are a slew of tests that attempt to measure how intelligent human beings are. They all measure different aspects and those factors will be covered here. One of the misconceptions is that the tests measure inborn intelligence. Few of the activities are designed for that purpose. They actually measure a person’s interaction with the environment and what they have learned from that interaction. The most common tested aspect is critical thinking. Instead of straightforward questions, intelligence tests offer questions with a twist. It is assumed that the most intelligent people will see obvious flaws in the obvious answers (Steinberg & Williams, 2015). Some intelligence tests also measure reflexes, both mental and physical. The assumption is quick reaction times reflect an active brain and in the line of thinking, a more intelligent person.

Knowledge isn’t all about what people know or how well they are in school. IQ tests test the intelligence of the person; however they test the pure thinking capacity rather than what people know. This means that intelligence comes from the entire cognitive thinking ability and not what they

     Since the development of the intelligence quotient, schools in every part of the world have been using the IQ test to categorize millions of students into three groups. These three groups, which are the gifted, the average, and the retarded, are falsifications that perpetuate in our world culture and cause many gifted students to be deemed retarded and vice a versa. Why then is the IQ test so heavily relied on in our school systems? For schools the answer is simple, an I.Q. test is a reliable predictor of a students later performance in academics. This answer is relatively true, but where the I.Q. test falls extremely short is with testing the multiple

On the contrary, those people who scored low on one kinds of ability test, were more likely to score badly on others as well. Meanwhile, Spearman also concluded that intelligence is a cognitive ability which could be measured and expressed numerically.

Whilst it is understood that this inaccuracy ranges by 4 points from the test subjects score, Simon Whitaker argues that as IQ tests were designed based on average intelligence rather than every ability, the inaccuracy of the test scores for those with a lower IQ is even higher, stating that the score can be as imprecise as 13 points either way (add ref). this of course if of importance as 13 points could mean the difference between an individual being diagnosed as having a learning disability or considered as having a low IQ, and vice

IQ tests measure cognitive ability, but they usually assess cultural learning more than pure, natural intelligence.

Most of test is just going to tell what students know on paper, but scores do not show what can an individual apply the knowledge in the real world. For instance, a person who has practice and invested their time on something and apply it in the real world is the one who's going to do well when it comes to who is actually is smart the one who has practice or the one that took the test and did good but is going to do bad because of the person that did not apply outside than a

According to Nesbitt (2005), other researchers misrepresented standardized tests by associating intellect with heritability. IQ testing to dissimilar cultural groups/people with disability opposes questions as to what IQ really measures. According to Arnold et al (2011), IQ testing generates a floor effect when pertained to people with lower IQ's. Example, in a practice IQ scores beneath a definite cut-off are still being utilized to conclude and categorize an individual’s intelligent disability. An alternative explanation to this matter would be to evaluate people from dissimilar culture groups and or those with mental retardation and incapacities with more than standardized tests. As for the natural bias for the mentally retarded, individuals should be assesses based on their needs, and the atmosphere influenced within their lives.

In addition, these tests rates a student’s performance on simply one certain day and does not take into account outside factors. There are many kids who just don’t do good on tests. Many of these students understand the content and are intelligent, but it doesn’t appear on the test. Some students also develop test anxiety, which affects how well they

Although many believe in the IQ data levels given to each student to be sound data, but the system is completely flawed. The first and ultimately most prevalent in accuracy is the of scoring errors. A study from______ explains that many times the handwritten essay portions are graded and examined by underpaid workers with no prior English training and is not qualified for such grading. This grading system leaves room for biased and tampered results. A worker without experience may not recognize the flaws in the wiring, or even in the answer to the question. This student due to the unrecognized flaws may be given an outstanding grade that would be meant for a student that has had prior knowledge in the subject and has exceptional work. Causing the tests to falter and making the writing portions grade become unreliable and unimportant. If these tests are not important enough to be graded by thoroughly train and qualified scholars, there is no need that these tests be made mandatory and be held to be high stakes

employment. The average person tends to trust the IQ test and other forms of intelligence testing

IQ tests can be considered biased measures of intelligence, as there are many factors that have to deal with it. Even though IQ test are total fairness it all depends on a person’s social interaction rate. For example, if a test taker comes from a third world country where education is not available vs. a test taker here the scores will range. Bias is present when a test score has implications that relevant showing the portrayal of the subgroup of test takers. It often has to do with social viewpoint and knowledge about the world.

Intelligence tests are inaccurate to measures true ability of a person because genes affect how a person responds to their surroundings, the tests cannot measure the person biological makeup or his true potential for being “smart”.

The IQ test focused on testing thinking rather than acquired knowledge. I feel that it does not measure the entire complexity of an individual’s thought process. The test is inclined on measuring an individual’s skills on the given problems which are abstract and without connection to real-life problems. Furthermore, I think a person can be trained to score high on the IQ test. Therefore, the IQ test makes intelligence a static thing yet it is dynamic. An individual effectiveness rely on a subject and so, since the IQ test omits tests on emotional sensitivity, acquired skills such as art, creativity and social understating, I think it is not a fair assessment of intelligence.

EQ proves that emotion influences a person's behavior though he is brilliant and high IQ.