Providing Sustainable Energy For Support The Growing Population Of The World

My argument is that nuclear power may be the so called “safe” and “clean” source of energy that we are looking for, but can we really afford to continue to use this source of energy. Is it “clean”? One problem with nuclear power is that

The use of nuclear power plants is a more efficient energy source compared to coal power plants. Coal has high emissions of greenhouse gases, especially SO2 which leads to acid rain formation, smog, health impairments, radioactivity and climate change. Nuclear power plants emit little to no harmful pollutants or gases, and if properly managed should not contribute to atmospheric climate change (AIU Online, 2016).

Nuclear power is a much greener option than others, and can help prevent the devastating effects of fossil fuels on the environment. Burning fossil fuels releases thousands of tons of GHGs (greenhouse gasses) into the air that cause a variety of serious environmental problems. The emissions cause global warming which leads to the melting of polar ice caps and the raising of oceans. This also causes acid rain and air pollution which pollutes water sources, accelerates erosion and damages ecosystems (Pacific

The author of The Cheap but Costly Alternative - Nuclear Power emphasizes the dangers of nuclear energy by informing you of all the disasters that can happen and have happened. The author also uses loaded language to create an emotional appeal on how people could get hurt so that the reader won't support nuclear energy. Wind or solar energy could be good alternatives to nuclear energy. These sources of energy are natural and clean considering they'd come right from the weather and

Nuclear energy is eco-friendly as it can reduce climate change. One significant benefit is that nuclear energy produces a low amount of carbon dioxide. Figure 3 shows the potential rate of carbon emission from different electricity generation such as, coal, oil, natural gas, renewable sources (wind, hydro, and solar power), and nuclear energy. The lowest potential rate of carbon dioxide emission (CO2) is Nuclear power.

The effects of climate change have already begun to take place, as the United States and other countries face hurricanes, heat waves, and snowstorms. As all scientists know, these changes are the results of carbon dioxide building up in the atmosphere. The main sources of this pollution are coal and oil plants. Nuclear power is a less pollutive alternative to coal plants, but its negatives outweigh its positives. Nuclear power produces a large amount of harmful byproducts that scientists cannot discard, and nuclear plants face the dangerously likely risk of a plant collapse. There are many, better alternatives to nuclear, oil, and coal power such as solar and wind power that have little

I. Abstract: Wind energy has many pros and cons, and thus is subject to much scrutiny as a viable energy source. A fundamental qualification for wind power is the ability to support the vast industries and the enterprises of the 6.3 billion people that inhabit this planet. In addition, wind power must be able to meet the needs of the Earth’s population in a renewable, reliable, and responsible manner. In the following paper, wind energy will be evaluated based on its energy/cost efficiency, possible environmental ramifications, its practicality and the various countries already implementing

Arguments FOR using and developing nuclear power To satisfy our general needs of heating our water, heating our homes, cooking our food, powering our appliances and lighting our rooms, we need to retrieve energy from the many many methods available to us. One of these choices is nuclear energy. There are very good reasons why it should be considered and developed further, to be used in the future. Firstly, by comparing it to the other non renewable energy sources (coal, oil and natural gas), nuclear power is a very clean energy as it does not produce any of the greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, which lead to the greenhouse effect or global warming.

Nuclear power is not safe. An accident is likely to occur every 10-20 years. For example, a European study from Science Daily stated that, “Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number of nuclear meltdowns that have occurred, scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz have calculated that such events may occur once every 10 to 20 years.” This evidence demonstrates that, nuclear accidents happen more often than we think they do. The dangerous aspect of a nuclear accident is the amount of radiation that is spewed into the atmosphere and the surrounding environment. Radiation causes sickness, cancer, mutations,

A nuclear power plant is a thermal power station that has a nuclear reactor as the main heat source. The power plant generates electricity by producing steam that runs through a turbine that is then connected to a generator which produces the electricity. Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the always looming question of “Do the benefits outway the risks?” For example, there is no carbon dioxide released into the air by the nuclear power plants but, the nuclear waste can be around for 200-500 thousand years seeping nuclear radiation into the area around it. There are many debates about whether or not nuclear power plants are good or bad for the United States,

While some say nuclear power is risky, the facts prove otherwise. Nuclear energy is often treated as a taboo subject due to misconceptions throughout history by the public, but in actuality, nuclear energy is relatively safe, when practiced correctly. Nuclear energy is a process in which atoms are split, producing heat, which boils water. The steam then turns a turbine to produce electricity. While fission is involved in nuclear bombs, the process in each are both different. The ‘fuel’ used for this process is Uranium-235, an isotope of uranium. Nuclear energy, contrary to popular belief, does not describe the horrible power of nuclear explosive, but the calculated, safe procedure of releasing the fundamental power of the atom. The pros of nuclear energy firmly outweigh the cons of the issue. If the people responsible for the facilities that the energy is produced in follow safety procedures the cons are nearly reduced to nothing. Not only is it a completely green energy source, but the power output is immense, and uranium is such a common material that is used so infrequently means that it will last for an extremely long time.

Increasing the use of Nuclear Power in the U.S is a necessary step for this country. The use of Nuclear power would substantially lower environmental pollution by diminishing the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from popular and harmful fossil fuel energy sources such as coal, crude oil and natural gas. Some argue that the use of Nuclear power is too dangerous, but evidence shows that it is a safe way and efficient way to extract energy without disrupting our earth. Another argument against the use of Nuclear Power is the handling of the nuclear waste. In reality, ninety-six percent of the nuclear waste can be recycled and the amount of nuclear waste is a minuscule amount compared to the impact of fossil fuels. Nuclear power is a safe, environmentally friendly and effective way to obtain energy.

What is the cleanest and safest type of alternative energy? To some people 's surprise it is actually nuclear power. Nuclear power is the safest, cleanest, and cheapest alternative to carbon heavy fossil fuels ("Switkowski"). Nuclear fission is when atoms of molecules get split and then releases an enormous amount of energy. Then that energy from the split atoms is used to heat water which is then used to turn large electrical generating turbines (DeGunther). Nuclear power is an inexpensive source and the cost of uranium is low. Also, the known reserves of uranium are much greater than fossil fuel sources(DeGunther).Nuclear power can generate 75 times the electricity per ton of uranium (Marketwired). A nuclear power plant can recover 95% wasted uranium and plutonium. The smoke that comes out of the smoke stacks of nuclear powers plants is just harmless steam ("What"). Energy released by nuclear fission is about ten millions times greater than the amount released by fossil fuels ("Pros and Cons of Nuclear"). Nuclear energy produces no carbon emissions which is blamed for causing global warming. France generates

When nuclear energy was first put into practice the public was fascinated by the new energy source that emerged from the atom and its efficiency. However, public fascination has turned to fear due to accidents at nuclear reactors and the dangers of radioactivity. While the dangers are apparent, advancements in technology and safety mechanisms make nuclear energy a safe and reliable clean energy alternative. In a time of growing environmental concerns of CO2 emissions and dependence of fossil fuels society should not let its fears from the past limit its future in a safe and clean energy alternative.

Nuclear energy has the potential to be what 's called “carbon-zero” if the uranium were mined and transported in a more efficient way.