preview

Psychological Analysis: Post Traumatic Stress Disor

Decent Essays

Karina Tampa (#39699317)
Psychological Analysis. When an individual is diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), multiple criteria must be addressed which I will elaborate in the document. When Mr. Wertz was deployed to Iraq in the infantry division, he witnessed the death of a comrade and in his second deployment he had many mortar attacks fulfilling criterion A of PTSD. Conclusively, there was a presence of a trauma while in the army when Mr. Wertz witnessed the death of soldiers in his division. Mr. Wertz recounts having nightmares about his combat. The nightmares are described as reoccurring for the duration of two months. The dream described is Mr. Wertz and his unit being barricaded in a house and being fired at directly; …show more content…

Furthermore, Mr. Wertz shows some signs of avoidance to the shooting range; however, the case does not specify the reason for his avoidance. Criterion C includes having the inability of recall certain info about the trauma. Therefore, Mr. Wertz fails to meet criterion C with the evidence provided. Mr. Wertz explains that he had been feeling on edge and explains that a loud crack triggers the memory of a gun firing during combat. Mr. Wertz is hyper vigilant and fulfills Criterion D of PTSD. Criterion D states that an individual must show signs of an increased arousal, unwarranted vigilance and an amplified startle response. In conclusion, Mr. Wertz’s traumatic event has not been treated and he displays symptoms of having posttraumatic stress disorder; however, the symptoms are taken from previous recollections after he was arrested. His medical record does not account for PTSD, so there is no documentation that his recollections are reliable. I believe that Mr. Wertz does battle with posttraumatic stress …show more content…

In California jurisdiction, the M’Naghten Test is used to deliberate the insanity or sanity of a person. There are two prompts and you must fail one of the prompts to have a verdict of insanity. The first part entails Mr. Wertz to have known the nature and quality of his act. Mr. Wertz had experience with rifles and experience being barricaded in a house with fire arms. He also knew the severity of using a rifle on the ranch. Being in the army, he knew that firing a rifle could lead to an injury and that barricading a house increased the chances of mortality or injury. It is plausible that Mr. Wertz may claim that he did know about the quality of the act he was doing, but he did not know that his action was criminally or morally wrong. However, the case file includes that he was interrogated on his whereabouts, and he said that he was shot at first which led to his criminal behavior. There was no evidence found of a weapon being shot in the case. Inclusively, there was evidence that he was found under a vehicle, so Mr. Wertz knew the severity of his criminal act by hiding or not being visible to the police. Mr. Wertz claims being in an amnestic state while shooting multiple rounds to the ranch house. However, memory loss is not characteristic of PTSD. The cognitive test, M’Naghten Test, takes into consideration the state of mind of the person at the time an individual committed the crime. For this case, Mr. Wertz does show a mental illness; however, mental

Get Access