Psychology Exam Essay

However you know Him/Her, God is the ultimate Sovereign. He/She rules all that He/She surveys and answers to no-one above Him/Herself. So in the entire universe, God is the Absolute Sovereign, and every force in nature including human conduct is His/her subject and under the control of "The Laws of Nature", i.e. "gravity", "cause and effect",

There is a lot of evil in the world, and much of it happens unexplainably. In the history of life on Earth bad things have happened and evil has caused problems. In relation to some world

Omniscient God only have the power, knowledge and control over human; to maintain that superiority God typically responds to human behavior with what they deserve. God blesses the righteous and punishes the evil man to remind their limitation and worship to the God.

Ernest Nagel identifies that God is all-knowing, all-powerful, and loving. However, if God has all of those traits, then why would He allow evil? This is where the problem of evil comes in. It says that if God exists, he is omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent. Because God is omniscient, He knows when evil occurs. Since He is omnipotent, He has the power to prevent it and his benevolent nature would permit him to stop evil. Yet, evil occurs anyways. Therefore, a God with such traits does not

God is referred to as one supernatural creature equipped with magical powers and special features. One of the feature of god is the ability to know everything that happens. This means nothing bad or good happens anywhere in the world without him knowing; thus god is all-knowing. God is also said to be all-good. This means everything that happens from god can only be good and consequently nothing bad can be done by god. Another feature of god is his ability of doing everything.

Therefore, it is not the case that God is an omnipotent and wholly good being.

Being a Christian we fail to understand sometimes why God allows bad things to happen to good people or bad things to happen in our life when all we are trying to do is live it the best we can. Or like that old saying goes “when it rains, it pours”. Why does evil exist in the first place if God created the world to be holy and sacred? Honestly we have all asked ourselves this question at least one in our life if not multiple times a week!

The problem of evil is, perhaps, the predominant theological concern for any religion that affirms the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God. Although the problem of evil does not and cannot rebut the existence of God, it does however, establish an inconsistency with God's perfect attributes. The problem of evil almost always ask these questions in one form or another: If God is perfect, why is there innocent suffering? Given the qualities attributed to God, is there any way to reconcile the suffering of the innocent? Specifically, if God is able to prevent the suffering of the innocent, yet chooses not to, then He is not omnibenevolent.

The second portion asks if he is able but not willing. This would make him malevolent. God is supposed to be omnimalevolent, all loving and all good. A God who is able to stop all evil but doesn’t is clearly not loving then, correct? Christians would respond that this apparent ignorance from God is actually human sin and not God turning his back on us.

According to the cosmological argument, the universe must have had an original cause, and this original cause seems to only point to one factor, God. God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all-loving being; whatever future is in store for humans, I believe, is not left up to Him, but up to us. I believe that God simply guides us through our lives and we have the will to decide how we live it. The problem of evil questions the existence of God based on the evidence that if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all loving, then surely he would help us in times of evil. However, this should not mean to say that all evil is immorally wrong. In fact, some good can be born out of a dark situation. God does exist and is all powerful, all knowing, and

Because if god is wholly he would never do any evil not under any circumstance. Also this again contradicts the fact that God is omnipotent if he can’t create without evil. Mackie also debunks " The universe is better with some evil in it than it could be if there were no evil."( Mackie pg. 206) This one Mackie quickly disproves by simply saying that it’s a restatement of a previous theory. Mackie believes it’s a restatement of “Evil is necessary as a means to good” thus having the same fallacies. The final theory Mackie debunks is " Evil is due to human freewill” (Mackie pg.208). Mackie believes this to be the best solution and answer for evil. The idea behind this is maybe evil has no connection to god but rather human being with free will. This then raises another question why would god give free will to people if it would lead to evil thus again contradicting that god is wholly good. He says 1. Free will is good and would be worse to lack it. 2. Its impossible for god to grant someone free will and to guarantee evil will never be done. Mackie concludes by saying there is no valid solution of the problem. That

 Evil doesn 't necessarily have to be an action by a human; it can also be a result of a natural disaster such as: hurricanes, earthquakes, illness, etc. A hurricane can take away everything from thousands of humans. This causes the people to have no home, clothes, or food. This is also a form of evil, due to the suffering it causes. This is called natural evil. People can bring about moral evil upon themselves, although, they rarely can bring natural evil upon themselves. There is a distinct difference between the two, and one evil does not cause the other. The reason I point the

First, many theologians have assumed that if God is all-powerful, omnipotent, which the Bible clearly teaches (e.g., 1Chron 29:11; Jer 32:17; Mt 19:26; Rev 1:8; 19:6), that nothing in his creation can ever thwart his will. At the very least, it is reasoned, God

God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, which makes us wonder what kind of morally sufficient reason justifies God to allow evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but so does God, so would God be the source of evil as well as good? We have established that God is the omnipotent and benevolent free creator of the world, but suffering and evil exist. Is God unable to prevent evil? If so, he would not be omnipotent. Is He able to prevent the evil in our world but unwilling? If this were then case then he wouldn’t be benevolent. A Persian thinker, Mani, suggested that the answer to this question was a kind of duality between the good and evil. This pluralistic view of the good and evil in our world would suggest that God is

Omnibenevolent means to be all loving or infinitely good. It is usually used when talking about God (Omnibenevolent Dictionary Definition). If God is omnibenevolent, then why is there still evil in our world? Two very influential people that have attempted to answer this question are Alvin Plantinga and John Leslie Mackie. Alvin Plantinga is an American philosopher who is known for his research in the philosophy of religion, epistemology, metaphysics, and Christian apologetics (Alvin Plantinga). J. L. Mackie was an Australian philosopher and is best known for his view on meta-ethics (J.L. Mackie). In this paper I will describe and defend Plantinga’s free will defense for the co-existence of evil and God and refute Mackie’s argument against an omnibenevolent God.