The Pros And Cons Of Validity

A hypothesis is an explanation that can be tested based on observation. A statistical hypothesis is testable explanation based on observation and different variables. A null hypothesis explains what the results of the experiment will be if the original hypothesis is wrong. An alternate hypothesis is the opposite result if there is or isn’t a null hypothesis. Semmelweis hypothesized that bacteria/virus filled extremities resulted in higher death rates.

Paula is apart of the target student group in her class. She does lack the cognitive capabilities as her peers in the higher cognitive functioning groups.Though Paula does show eagerness to perform as well as her other peers, there are many things, including her low cognitive ability, that keeps her from catching onto the information he is taught. During the initial pre-test, Paula, scored with a 33.34%,one of the two lowest scores in the class. Like her peers, Paula was not able to finish the test, and the test fairly measured the information that she was able to answer before getting highly frustrated with the pre-test like her peers. Paula was able to correctly identify the questions that asked about the needs of a plant. Paula was

2. To lose weight, the diet should be as close to the normal diet as possible; only then one will to stick to it

He also discussed how a “good test” can give us bad information or the information is being used poorly. Not understanding how to interpret test data or administering a test improperly can effect the validity. Some examples of

When dealing with psychological assessment you are dealing with people, and any time you are dealing with people you have to be mindful of the ethical concerns that come with whatever form of testing you are conducting. In the past there have been many legality issues concerning ethical violations, some were on accident and others were carried out to benefit someone other than the person being tested. Anyone in the psychological field has the responsibility to remain objective and conscientious of what they are putting a subject through during the time of testing. There are many ethical concerns that I will discuss throughout this paper, the main focus I am revolving

Psychology became popular after the psychological testing that was conducted after World War I. Unfortunately many unqualified individuals were claiming to be able to deliver psychological services. While the APA attempted to put a resolution in place stating that only trained professionals would be allowed to administer the psychological testing. There were no clear guidelines to what made a professional “qualified” and many individuals did not belong to

Test worthiness is utilized to determine if an assessment/test is appropriate or suitable to be used. The four criteria for an assessment consist of validity, reliability, cross-cultural fairness, and practicality (Neukrug & Fawcett, 2015). These characteristics should resemble a how a counselor should portray themselves in a Christian worldview because a Christian must be able to utilize testing in a trustworthy manner that would allow for critical thinking to make the best interpretation to treat and encourage clients/patients that is worthy of their humanity. It is important to be able to provide a testing that is consistent and accurate in able to provide an understanding that leads to a better conceptualization and treatment plan. Being

In addition, these tests rates a student’s performance on simply one certain day and does not take into account outside factors. There are many kids who just don’t do good on tests. Many of these students understand the content and are intelligent, but it doesn’t appear on the test. Some students also develop test anxiety, which affects how well they

The validity of a test if very important, because it can make or break a test. The purpose of a test is to measure something specific. If the test has low validity it is not measuring what it supposed to measure. The Holland codes validity is measured through the different personality types. The test has shown to accurately predict a possible career choice for each participants (O’Connell 1971).

Construct validity identifies how well a test has measured its claims. Construct validity ensures that when a specific subject is being measured, there is no interference. For example; within the position at TD Bank, when personality factors are being measured such as if the individual is going through depression, the test should only measure that category without relating it to other components such as anxiety. By doing so, the test will ensure that construct validity is valid. The aptitude test will ensure that it does not have misleading question, nor will there be specific questions as the example above. The test will ensure that it is testing exactly the purpose of the test rather than other

According to Green et al. (2011), reliability coefficients matter with respect to test norms, validity studies, individual assessment, and test sensitivity. Reliability coefficients are important in these cases because they inform researchers and practitioners on how to use test scores, which will have implications for those who are being assessed. Moreover, these four subcategories address how reliability coefficients provide information about how well test scores are actually measuring the psychological constructs they are designed to measure. These factors are important to consider in that they influence interpretation and application of test results that may be used to develop tests or make conclusions about individuals. Regarding test

One of my experiences, I can remember with psychological tests would be Law Enforcement Examination (LEE). Law Enforcement Examination (LEE) test, is for those who want to proceed with a career in corrections. The test is offered every two years, you pay a fee and receive notice of when and where to take the test. The test was multiple choice and timed. The questions they asked you on the test ranged from one extreme to another. They ask you question about yourself, personal and social life. They asked you questions such as, if you were to see a crime being committed what would you do? While taking the test, I was confused on how to answer some of the questions. I wanted to answer the questions correctly on the test so that I passed. If I failed

To some extent, simply knowing that something such as faking or impression management occurs may help practitioners when interpreting assessment results. For instance, most people understand that how others see them may be influenced by behavior, speech, or outward appearance. Beyond this, some assessments are less prone to faking or impression management, such as cognitive ability tests, job knowledge tests, and work samples (Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology [SIOP], (2017). Using these types of tests with other tests that may be prone to faking and impression management would provide a way to link data and see if people may be engaging in these behaviors. For example, biodata has the potential for faking to occur, but the

There comes a time when we all come across a specific test such as school tests, driving test, or even as simple as food tasting test. However, there is a difference between regular tests and testing’s when referring to psychological testing. There are several different psychological tests that many psychiatrists, psychologists, and school counselors use to determine certain abilities, however each of the tests are used for a specific purpose. It is vital for the individuals to contain high knowledge of the tests before applying it to others.

When it comes to objective tests, it is implied that they are accurate, precise, and resistant to biased influences. Scoring errors are another potential concern. In reviewing the projective test, it is determined by Meyer and Kurtz (2006) that one‘s personality will not shine through with force and clarity regardless of the medium, the presence of the client’s responses confuses the efforts to interpret the test scores, and that is what the psychologists are most interested in interpreting (Meyer & Kurtz, 2006)