Pub Med Health Database Research Paper

An annotated bibliography is a catalogue of citations to books, documents and articles with the purpose of the annotation being to inform the reader of the precision, relevance and quality of the sources cited (Davis, 2009). Evidence based practice enables health care professionals to effectively use current verification during the decision-making procedure (Sacket et al 2000). Healthcare professionals use a hierarchy of evidence as a guide to define the reliability and importance of the evidence based research; with the evidence that is founded further upon

Making assumption as health care professionals that the criteria for determining accuracy and relevance of health information improves the quality of information consumers can access. Having the methods to measure reliable sourced health information websites is a credible support for patients and other members of the public. Consumers of health information need to be educated about how to look for information that is up to date, relying on websites which are known for sharing evidence based facts. Website evaluation also needs to include an overview by the user to establish who runs the site, what do they say, when was the information posted, where was the information retrieved from and why does the site exist (National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 2014). By providing a systematic approach or framework to evaluate the site, health care professionals are able to support consumers in accessing information which will improve their understanding of relevant issues and treatment options. This ultimately benefits both the health care provider and the consumer of this information, encouraging a team

Locate a total of five research databases or collections related to your topic. Each research database description is worth 30 points. You may search for these in various locations, e.g., the Internet, an intranet at work, print publications, etc. You may NOT choose the databases that are already familiar to you – MEDLINE, PUBMED (which also indexes MEDLINE), GOOGLE SCHOLAR, and CINAHL. Instead, you are expected to expand your knowledge of evidence-based sources. Places to help you begin include your textbook, which lists databases and websites that report research. The Chamberlain online library (http://library.chamberlain.edu) gives you access to several databases and provide tutorials for searching. Government sites such as those at the National Institutes of Health offer collections of research on a variety of subjects. The key to choosing the databases is that each contains research-based evidence that also pertains to your topic of interest.

Chin , and Robert C. Cantu have MDs. Philip Montenegro has a B.S. degree. The site is housed off of Google Scholar. This article can also be found on the database PubMed. It contains published articles from reputable journals. There is ways to contact the corporation that runs the site via email or phone. The site is up-to-date and was last updated in 2017. It contains the latest articles from published journals. The content on this site is accurate and consistent with other well-recognized sources. There is a plethora of content worth visiting. There are numerous articles with a variety of topics. The website is organized and easy to navigate. It contains links for related articles and access to the site’s social media pages. There is no bias on this site. It is simply the authors explaining their

The material for this research was gotten from various journals such as US National library of medicine as well as other databases such as Medical research journal. The information from these journals is credible as the journals are peer reviewed and scholarly.

The key to providing high-quality healthcare is to have a complete depiction of a patient’s health record. Collecting comprehensive patient data is vital in forming a complete picture of a patient’s health record. It can help for improvements, and measures it for the intended use; for cognitive support to help integrate the data; to integrate evidenced-based practice guidelines and research; to build patient portfolios and for physician diagnosis; for continuing education for knowledge and treatments; to involve patients and their families into medical decision making in order to ensure accurate and consistent data; and to generate reliable information. To ensure that there are useful, reliable, and resource-efficient quality data in healthcare,

Data extraction. From full-text articles, we extracted data on the author, publication year, type of study, research design, population, sampling methods, number of participants in the study, data collection, independent variable and measurement, dependent variables and measurement, interventions for randomized trials, how the author assessed the effect, how the authors defined whether or not it worked, statistical analysis used, results, conclusion, limitations, strength, weakness, and level of evidence. Data were aggregated in Microsoft Excel for summary and analyses.

A limited literature search was conducted on July 15, 2015 using PubMed, TripDatabase as well as a focused Internet search. The retrieval was limited to human populations and documents published within the past 5 years. A total of 99 journal articles were found and reviewed. The abstracts were scanned for relevance and 20 were identified as containing important information. These 20 articles

We live in a culture that is constantly inundated with streams of information through a variety of social mediums. Patients have unlimited access to an extensive variety of resources regarding medical care through online blogs, websites and social media. In 2009, 45.5% of adults utilized online resources to gain more information regarding their health (Women’s Health USA, 2012). Considering that statistic is antiquated, one would suspect the percentage to have grown significantly over the years with the increase in access to online resources. It is imperative future advanced practice nurses have the ability to guide patients in evaluating what they read online. Can these sources provide reliable and appropriate medical advice?

It is important for professional nurses to evaluate information found on the internet because (1) Patients engagement: Patients can play a positive role in protecting their health, they can choose which treatment is appropriate for them, cooperative fully in decision making about their disease conditions. (2) Improving health literacy: Nurses can advocate for patients who are illiterate by helping to understand their disease condition and treatment options. (3) Improving treatment decision-making: Patients are known to be dissatisfied when they are not properly informed about any decision making concerning a disease condition and treatment. Evidence-based patient decision aids facilitate the process of making informed decisions about disease management and

Healthcare organizations require secure information systems to protect the patient information. The HITEACH Act pushes organizations toward electronic health records or systems that have cloud technology. The government created health information standards when the Affordable Care Act was implemented. The Affordable Care Act made sure healthcare organizations were providing care efficiently and effectively. The government provided incentives for organizations and medical professionals that implement electronic health records. The transition from paper documents to electronic information was a difficult process for all parties involved. Each organization needs to implement schedules to determine when the system would go

The big idea of “How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine” is that it describes the different types of clinical research reporting, and explains how to critically appraise the publications. The book provides the tools to find and evaluate the literature, and implement the findings in an evidence-based, patient-centered way. It is written for anyone in the health care professions who has little or no knowledge of evidence-based medicine; it provides a clear understanding of the concepts and how to put them into practice at the basic, clinical level.

When documentation of patient medical records began, patient information was documented by a nurse and communicated to a doctor and other health care team members by means of handwritten charts. Accuracy of patient information depended upon the legibility of the documentation, and it is a widely known stereotype that a doctor’s handwriting is messy and indecipherable. These charts, because of their handwritten nature, have resulted in an estimated annual 98,000 deaths due to misunderstandings (Allen, 2013). As the technology became more advanced, it became of great importance to ensure proper communication amongst health care team members and to prevent unnecessary deaths.

I have determined that Cinhal via ebsco is an appropriate database to search to systematically review the current literature on this topic, it is appropriate as it is focuses on nursing and allied health literature, allows narrowing search results by language, source type and date of publication.

A review of the MEDLINE literature database from 1966 through October 2003 was performed looking for the terms advocacy (child advocacy, consumer advocacy, legislative advocacy, patient advocacy), as well as advocacy education and training, and was limited to children from birth through 18 years. The titles and many of the abstracts of 4580 articles were reviewed, and 104 articles were read in full. From these, 68 were selected for review here; they were thought to be of particular interest to practicing pediatricians and pediatric