Public Attitude Towards Immigration At Supranational, National And Regional Level

Immigration issues have been a problem throughout history. This Society holds different perceptions on the topic. Some people favor the flow of immigrants while others oppose it. Immigration is a social problem that must constantly be reviewed due to the complexity of the problems. In this situation, different factors such as the quality of life for immigrants, how they impact the economy, how the implementation of policies would benefit them, have to be taken into consideration. Immigration policies affect all aspects of today’s society. The key figures in the immigration issue are immigrants, documented/undocumented, political figures.

But one prevalent issue that has continued to be the source of much controversy is immigration. Founded on immigration this issue is not new to this country. Although it’s an issue that has been around for many years the mixed sentiments directed at it have only continued to become more prevalent. This may be due to the various perspectives from which it is viewed. The way in which an issue is looked at is influenced by various factors which become evident when the issue of immigration is discussed.

The U.S found itself confronted to new challenges that they didn’t think of before. This new challenges led to a shift of American attitudes towards immigration. This was due to the high influx of the immigrants coming from Europe and of the liberal paradox related to immigration (Tichenor 2002, 51). The United States found itself caught between two stools where immigration benefited the economy but the on the other side its obligation to set limits regarding social and publics welfare available to the new wave of immigrants.

Over the last decade, the number of immigrants has increased tremendously growing from 331,000 to a whopping 409,000. An increase of about 78,000 people ( Britannica). Despite media coverage on the issue many people are blind to the true nature of the situation . Therefore it is important to understand the extent to which immigration affects us all.

The attitudes of immigrants who have arrived recently differ from those who have arrived earlier in many ways. From 2002-2009 the percentage of votes from a series of questions has changed drastically. One of the questions that was asked if the immigrant spent most of their time with another native from their country. The next one question was if they called another immigrant in their country at least once a week on the phone. The final question was if that immigrant spoke their native language at home.

The population of America sharply divides over the issues of immigration, especially their concerns regarding the rise in illegal immigration and how to resolve issues of their legal status. The attitudes of Americans differ considerably toward documented immigration, but overall they favor keeping documented immigration levels either below the current level or the same. There seems to be a general consensus that illegal immigration should be reduced, but at the same time, the Americans also disagree whether illegal immigrants hurt

Contemporary study on political opinions concerning immigration frequently pits points of view highlighting economic self-interest versus cultural or ideological rationalization. They (studies) are also based on the particular immigration policy at hand at the time, therefore, addressing only the power of that particular policy.

Public views toward undocumented immigration is not much positive because we are not welcoming their presence in our society. here, I would like to examines the receptions of undocumented immigrants in the US society. when we talk about illegal immigrants, people have first thoughts that they would be Hispanic, criminal, and uneducated people. However, studies and data show, there are other groups of people, who are living in the US without proper documentation. Findings suggest that many undocumented immigrants have been discriminated in the work place and public forums, such as school, restaurants, and streets by behavior, verbal abuse, lower pay, and labeling theory.

The changing tides of immigration have all been impacted by the attitudes of society, it has caused change and halted change from occurring as well. Government action and inaction have been impacted by political opinions of the public. Throughout the history of immigration in the United States, “opinions on the government's ability to handle immigration issues, in addition, reveal extremely clear and negative attitudes.” For a long time, the public has seen a problem with the government and their capability when it comes to addressing illegal immigration. It can be inferred that due to the lack of support from the American people, the government were pushed to increase political action toward illegal immigration. By doing so, again there is a correlation with the restriction that has pushed people to illegal measures. There is a strong unified relationship between how history, and the opinions of society have governed immigration in the United States. Most notably, immigration has been divided into clear distinctions where some carry more weight than

While illegal immigration remains a serious problem in the United States, other countries around the world are also being affected. According to the source of Albert R. Hunt “Facing the Facts on Illegal Immigration.”, he said that “The United States has been since long time the world´s leader in the reception and integration of immigrants.” Americans are deeply divided in their views on the impact of immigration in the country, and anger about illegal immigration colors public attitudes towards all aspects of immigration, whether legal or not. Immigration is a striking theme for many people. On the one hand, some argue that countries should be open to those who bring valuable skills and education. On the other hand, some argue that too

The attitudes of immigrants who arrived here recently than that came earlier were starting to get worse. Over the time more and more people started to come into the united states. There are still more people coming into the united states. I don't blame them if it's for reasons back at where they live. But I do if they come here illegally.

Brown, Christia Spears, and Christine A. Lee. "Impressions Of Immigration: Comparisons Between Immigrant And Nonimmigrant Children's Immigration Beliefs." Analyses Of Social Issues & Public Policy 15.1 (2015): 160-176. Academic Search Premier. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.

Anti-immigrant sentiment tends to arrive when waves of mass immigration occurs, the host societies believe that their jobs are being taken from them and that their standard of living is falling all because of the migrants that have come to live in the host country. Due to this anti-immigration sentiment can be seen to be a politically significant phenomenon in European societies since the second world war. Strong political opposition to immigration comes from populist-extremist parties (PEPs), they see immigration as a threat to the social and cultural cohesion of the host country. On the political spectrum most of these parties are right wing parties, somewhere between established conservative parties and openly violent and anti-democratic right wing parties. Over the past years in Europe these parties have been growing in power and during the past three waves of PEPs, they have slowly gained more and more power even though many thought they would die out. The first waves of PEPs come about after the second world war, in the immediate post war period the Sozialistiche Reichspartei party in West Germany was established however this was banned by he constitution later on. The second wave came int he 1970s with the National Front in the UK and the anti-tax parties in Scandinavia. The third wave came in the 1980s when a large number of parties emerged and have remained part of the political scene since then. This shows that anti-immigrant sentiment is politically significant in

A recent survey was conducted which revealed that forty-one percent of Americans currently hold anti-immigrant sentiments. Similar trends were discovered for Europeans with thirty-seven percent of people in the United Kingdom and fifty-two percent of people in France expressing anti-immigrant attitudes (Krogstad, 2015). These trends show that negative views about immigrants are evident globally, and thus should be treated as an important issue. However, anti-immigrant attitudes are not involuntary and do not emerge from individual thought. Western nations, the United States in particular, use significant events in history such as the 9/11 attacks to their advantage by inciting extreme nationalism that demonizes immigrants which allows for the

To measure societal acceptance towards immigrants, attitudinal data can be utilized to better understand the effects of immigration on both societies. One way to measure the general political reaction of each country towards the influx of immigrants. Though such data is constrained by temporal boundaries, a blanket understanding can be gleamed from surveys taken in nations during different periods. Further, in both countries, support for the importance of mainstream right-wing strategies has exacerbated the politicization of the immigrant issue. A survey asking identical questions in the two countries was conducted by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia in 2000. The Swedes tend to be more positive than the Danes, but the differences are not dramatic. However, similarly to Denmark, societal attention to the issue increased in the 1980s, not least due to a considerable growth in the number of refugees from the Middle East. In both nations, there are clear trends that reveal a significant rise in negative attitudes towards immigrants; but, the levels of said societal and political attention towards immigrants and the policies enacted which affect immigrants differ greatly in Sweden and Denmark.