Public Health Care Intergovernmental Analysis

Public health is defined as the overall health and safety of the U.S. population including core functions and essential services provided by the federal departments and agencies.(1) The agencies that are being referred to in this definition are agencies that include health care delivery systems. Public health is achieved by preventing disease, monitoring, regulating, and promoting health through organized efforts.(1) The organized efforts are, in part, organized and put in place by these health care delivery systems. The title health care delivery system refer to the organization of people, institutions, and resources that deliver health care services to acquire the

Health care systems are organizations that are formed to meet the overall health needs of the population. Health care is regarded as one of the leading cause in promoting not only physical and mental health but the well-being of the population. Legislation is implemented requiring government to offer services to all members of its society. The role of health services and the organizations that provide aid is to focus on the health of an individual and to uphold their human rights. According to WHO (2013), a “well-functioning health care system requires a robust financing mechanism, a well-trained and adequately-paid workforce, reliable information on which to base decisions and policies, and well maintained facilities and logistics to deliver quality medicines and technologies (World Health Organization; 2013).

Health care has to be regulated and controlled as well as monitored more especially by the government. The major role of the government is to provide for its people, to protect its people as well as to look at the welfare of its people. Therefore in order to achieve this several law which acts as guidelines need to be put in place t monitor how health care is offered.

Public health protection is one of the most important goals of the government. In contrary to health care law which focuses on financing, organization and delivering medical services; by enacting and enforcing public health law, the government created conditions for people to live healthier and safer life. It’s a tool to create missions for public health officials, to assign functions and to exercise their regulation power in influencing health behavior, identification and response to health threats and development and implementation of health and safety standards.

Federal and States public health involvement has evolved over the years, because the relationship between the different levels of government are changing and due to the fact that we are now aware of the of threats to local communities well- being health, safety and our local communities expectations for governmental response to situations and as well

Educational and research institutions, insurers, payers, and medical providers are all constituents of a health care system. These factors share one goal that is to effectively maintain the public health of a population. Public health could be described as organized measures to prevent disease and promote health among a population.

My interest in the involvement of Public Health goes more related to the poor access of healthcare that many people suffer. The topics involved in this program would help me discover new educational opportunities and comprehend more on how these aspects can be changed. Keeping in mind that equity to the health services is a fundamental right that everybody must have and it is not only for the ones that can pay; it goes the same for the racial groups. Thinking from the perspective as a future health care professional, this is the situation that concerns me the most. Since not everybody has access to these basic services, I will like to work with how I can help to avoid this; at least in my community. Also, involving my community, it will be

A public health care system is a system of health care financing designed to meet the cost of all or most health care needs from a publicly managed fund. In some countries, the fund is controlled directly by the government or by an agency of the government for the benefit of the entire population. A public health care system has its own advantages and disadvantages. As it consists of universal health care coverage, every residents or citizens of a particular country get to enjoy mandatory health services funded by the government. This system gives individuals that cannot manage the cost of health care the administrations required. However, a public health care system also has its own drawbacks. Patients that require administration often have

To facilitate the health policy coordination between the regional and national level the Inter-Territorial Council of the National Health System (CISNS) was established as the highest coordination body [1] but does not have executive power. The CISNS has the function of providing recommendations to promote cooperation and cohesion, and assess the essential duties of the SNS [3]. Other stakeholders such as the Ministry of Education (Provision of professionals), and the Ministry of Science and Innovation (to address research needs) also collaborate with the CISNS.

All around the world, there are a wide range of different approaches and focuses when it comes to organising health systems as, although all countries are constructed of the same three levels of care, the way in which patients flow through these different levels and how the government run and fund their health system varies widely. Ultimately, each health system aims to provide the best possible healthcare to their citizens which can be achieved by focusing on particular goals such as improving access, efficiency and quality in order to successfully measure their performance.

A health care system refers to the comprehensive organization, structures and strategies through which Medicare and health care is made available by the government to its citizens. A health care system is a product of countries politics. It is a nations system of governance that will dictate upon the most convenient model of health care to adopt. There is no universally acceptable method, and in adopting each; a government has to take into account a variety of factors, which would range from available finances vis-a-vis the total population. A comparison of two models of health care or two countries approach to the provision of health services has to encompass the core issues of financing and health care management. Health sector is the most vital industry in a country and how effectively or ineffectively it is handled goes forth to reveal the social, political and economic policies of a country towards its citizens. A biggest investment of a government has to be in its people and what better way to do it than to invest in their health.

The public health system takes into consideration “all public, private, and voluntary entities that contribute to the delivery of essential public services within a jurisdiction. Therefore this concept ensures that all entities’ contributions to the health and well-being of the community or state are recognized in assessing the provision of public health services”.

The system of healthcare all over the world does vary depending on government intervention strategies. Depending on the size of the system, the state will manage to imply the most preferred system in accordance to the views of its citizens and medical providers. These interventions, which are needed by the citizens, have several impacts such as the citizens might view the government as the most efficient way of protection. In addition, the government funding might reduce the expensiveness of the medical products.

According to the CDC, “public health is the science of protecting and improving the health of people and their communities (CDC, 2017)”. Public health has a high emphasis on the big picture of health across an entire population. Their focuses range from disease prevention to providing health awareness to the public. While expanding their focus on interventions designed at the environment level, understanding of human behavior and lifestyle, and medical care options that impact diseases among the whole population (Harvard Chan, 2017). Once public health organizations have identified the main cause of issues they will be filtered down into specialized aspects which drive interests within the medical care aspect.

It is inadvisable to blame, who is the main cause of the failure. While we think that the intervention of community organization did not work well, we forgot that to evaluate ourselves. The government has homework to develop a specific guideline on strategies and goals, improve stewardship systems from the central government to the local governments. Overall improvement in the health system is needed to improve health status and equity. The partnership is crucial, but not a single way to achieve the goal. It is too ambitious when the government measures the success of the partnership by increased life expectancy or the decreased mortality and morbidity. The indicator of the partnership program should be a process indicator, such as increased community participation in health programs or increased utilization of health services.