Public Services Values

The siting of the SSTP in London, Ontario offers an excellent case to examine the ways in which Harris’s “common sense restructuring of public services, including the repeal of numerous land use planning requirements and the authorization of waste disposal sites without public input, work simultaneously to create new forms of white privilege and environmental racism in Southwestern Ontario” (Mascarenhas, 2012, p. 128). To meet the infrastructural needs of London’s rapidly growing population, London’s Planning Department proposed to build the SSTP along its southwest border. The plant is scheduled to be built by 2020 at a cost of approximately $80 million (DeBono, 2014). The story of the SSTP originated in 1996 when the City of London

Social equality is the concept in which all individuals possess the same fundamental basic liberties, opportunities, moral value/respect, and social benefits. The concept of ‘equality’ has a multiplicity of meanings and definitions, and with the rise of liberalization and democratization around the world ‘social equality’ has become the most predominant. As economic openness creates greater wealth disparities, the parallel rise of democratization has enabled citizens to demand more accountability measures and public welfare services from their governments in order to manage such disparities. Although the movement towards greater social

Although equality and equity are not the same, the concepts are intimately related. With the absence of a single accepted definition of equity, there is general agreement that equity implies quality. The measurement of inequality pertains to statistical variation. Equity on the other hand requires normative judgements based on moral theories. Inequality in consumption means that different people receive different

The purpose was to find more than just a simple prohibition on discrimination, rather, future guarantees of equal treatment and ensuring inequality is no longer a barrier to entering the public service were needed (Johnson, 2011, p. 362). Therefore, the designation of historically disadvantaged groups had the purpose of readdressing past discrimination and encouraging minority integration in the public service (Johnson, 2011, p. 362). After passing the Employment Equity Act in 1995, the Public Service Commission changed its practices to “ensure that the regular staffing process is free of attitudinal and systemic barriers” along with corrective measures to address the underrepresentation of the designated groups (Johnson, 2011, p. 363). Also, the Treasury Board Secretariat was given the task of developing policies and practices that allow equitable representation of designated groups and departmental employment equity plans (Johnson, 2011, p. 363).

Jerry, you are correct that prior to the 1970s social equity was not a theme of administration. According to Cronkhite (2013), Wilson saw the role of the public administrator as that as carrying out the will of politicians. During this time administrators followed politicians and stood by and watched as slavery and segregation laws were enforced (Cronkhite, 2013). With the advent of the social equity themes public administrators have more freedom to determine how to deliver services to the public without the input of politicians. This also gave public administrators the right, and duty, to ensure that services are delivered fairly to all (Cronkhite, 2013). One change in law enforcement that resulted from the social equity themes during

Social Justice and Equity: It can be referred as Fairness for all. I am a strong advocate for equal treatment for all. Diversity in all ramification should be the watch-word of every enterprise as it brings out the best in every individual as they fill inclusive. Suggestions and opinions should be viewed from its content rather from the person that made them. This is one of my strengths. I still exceed expectations and have acquired more social justice skill during the duration of this course.

This week reading highlights the 3 categories that signify Public service motives, in which Dr. Wise described as “ the process that causes individuals to perform acts that contribute to the public good as a way of satisfying their personal need” (Stillman, 319). These types are: Affective motive, Rational motives and norm-based motives.

Equity: the quality of being fair or impartial. In a situation of equity, all parties are equally benefited and equally disadvantaged. There is a symmetrical balance of power. But can there be equal power, and have the notion of power still exist? Because of that, there is a dynamic of asymmetrical power. The system is designed to favor and continually promote the ideology and control of the dominant group. And it’s never questioned. Though accepted by the masses, the asymmetry of power has caused countless struggles, wars, and even an entire breakdown of that system. At some point, the nondominant group gathers and rises to confront the dominant group, upsetting the balance and challenging the dominant group’s authority.

Before providing context into the history of social equity in public administration and a discussion of the major challenges that confront public administrators in the delivery of equitable public services. It is important to know how this study defines social equity and public services. The definition of social equity is taken from NAPA and is defined as “The fair, just, and equitable [emphasis added] management of all institutions serving the public directly or by contract; and the fair and equitable distribution of public services, and implementation of public policy; and the commitment to promote fairness, justice, and equity [emphasis added] in the formation of public policy” (as cited in Norman-Major, 2011, p. 237). Public services are

It is posited that the attainment of complete equality is unachievable and due to the nature of society, some individuals will be given more resources than others. However, it is the notion’s force, which, overtime, will develop ideas, attitudes and schemes to increase equality. Thus, the distributive justice approach, paired with egalitarianism, although dismissed as superficial, can provide aid for improvement to equality in the

Core values are a wide expression to describe the principles by which we describe individual, occupation, or business. Through the development of brainstorming and studying my professional experience, I have established in a set of values that are very essential in public administration. In order to succeed successfully at an organizational and personal level in the public administration, these values must be trained on a daily basis.

Some of the qualities and skills we value in our community are Democracy, Social justice, equality, and Integrity. As a democratic country, we expect our decisions to be made after hearing all the voices and the will of the majority will be carried out. For example, when a group of people wants to start a fundraiser, they all need to vote and pick a fundraising idea that the majority of the group wants to raise money for.One of the important values in our community is Social Justice and Equality, meaning equal rights for all races,gender,class,citizenship, religion and more.As important as it is to show equality,it is not always applicable in all situations,"Equality is not always Justice" because providing help according to everyone's needs

According to the principal of equality, all individuals should be treated equally regardless of class level. Based on this

Before we discuss social equality, we must comprehend what “social equality” is. Social equality is “the social state of

There is a difference between equity and equality: in a mathematical sense, equality is about equal parts identical in size or number, whereas equity is a more flexible measure allowing for equivalency while not demanding sameness. Social equity and inclusivity go hand in hand. To recognize a marginalized group means that they are being included in their own way but at the same level a more common group is recognized. Social equity implies fair access to livelihood, education, and resources; full participation in the political and cultural life of the community; and self-determination in meeting fundamental needs. Inclusion and social equity should be core values given the fact that minorities are now becoming the majority; it’s a time to learn and respect other people’s cultures, lifestyles, and ideas.