What comes to mind when one thinks of the word ‘puppy’? It is probable describe a puppy as a lovable, adorable, and cuddly companion. However, one might also identify the animal as a menace and a liability or even as a delicious source of food. Why does this single word hold so many meanings? One’s past experiences and biases influences these conflicting views and attitudes. For instance, an individual’s fond view of puppies may exist because they were raised with puppies and consequently grew affectionate toward the animals. On the contrary, if another individual has not bonded with puppies as pets, then they will share the latter point of view. In the short story “Puppy” by George Saunders, the multiple characters view single events and …show more content…
Marie values the affection and tenderness that were absent in the relationship between her and her mother. Therefore, she is insistent on being a caring and supportive presence in her children’s life. In addition, Marie is also hypersensitive to relationships that do not appear to embody her impression of family. This is apparent in Marie’s reaction to Callie’s treatment of Bo. Saunders states, “He rose to a sitting position, railed against the chain, whipped it back and forth, crawled to the water…took a drink: a drink from a dog’s bowl” (176). Marie’s description of Bo alludes to her own childhood. Marie was locked in a closet as a child, like a caged animal; consequently, when Marie compares Bo to a dog, she unconsciously references her own childhood trauma. She identifies Bo as a helpless child, like herself, and sees the cruelty of her own mother in Callie. Therefore, Marie’s narrative is not a concrete, unbiased description of what happened; instead, Marie’s perception is partial to her past experiences. On the contrary, the short story’s second narrator, Callie, views the same event from a altered standpoint.
Callie’s stance on motherhood is influenced by her previous experiences and concerns towards Bo. Saunders describes Bo’s dangerous habit of running away and putting himself in danger. Callie is even told that Bo will die if she does not take action to save him (174). Callie,
Through whom a story is told plays a significant part in how the reader interprets it. This can be used to the author’s advantage to add ambiguity to the characters, making their story more than just black and white. Kelly Link’s “Stone Animals” and Lidia Yuknavitch’s Dora: A Headcase is no exception. It may seem that these two stories have little in common, one being about a house beset by rabbits and the other about a girl suffering from hysteria. When one looks closer at the use of point of view, however, distinct connections appear. Though Link and Yuknavitch employ different points of view in their respective stories, they both use it to discredit their own characters and create doubt about their mental state and reliability. This forces a discussion about psychological trauma and how one attempts to hide it, such as through the blurring of reality, odd behaviors, and an emphasis on nicknames.
Because the story is written in diary format, we feel especially close to this woman. We are in touch with her innermost thoughts. The dominance of her husband, and her reaction to it, is reflected throughout the story. The narrator is continually submissive, bowing to her husband's wishes, even though she is unhappy and depressed. Her husband has adopted the
Marie’s case is a tragic one. Maries love for her husband begins strong; she is madly in love with him, but the labor that he puts into the land changes him into a hard man which she can no longer love. It is the land, the great American dream, that changes Frank and it is the land, which strips Marie of all love for him. When she falls in love with Emil,
His days of screwing young attractive women like Racine, was over. His long suffering wife was all he could handle these days. After decades of messing around, he finally would reap the benefits of her love and commitment to him under “for better or for worse.” His great relationship with the young woman who only wanted love was over. By virtue of her diligence and sustenance, the man who knew more about Racine than any of them had considered her birth, her determination and will. Most of all, the judge admired how Racine took care of others. Racine gave him a priceless jewel of feeling wanted. He understood Racine better than her father had. Looking at her father now, the judge was a proud grandfather too, and he could see the love that Robert Bentley and Racine had for one another. The future was truly theirs for the asking. With his life over and presenting with a 50-pound weight loss he knew this man was guilty; but he wanted to know in his last days that his doll Racine could be with the man she loved. No more roaches, no more wishing for her mother to get well – ICE was good now. It was time though to make life better for a woman he truly felt deserved love,
A Three Dog Life is about Abigail Thomas trying to cope with her husband’s traumatic head injury, that happened because she let Rich walk Harry alone one night; which makes him acts differently to the things that were so familiar to him. We read along as Thomas tries out new coping mechanism; like buying a new house, new dogs and buying paintings. The purpose of this essay is to take an analytical approach to how guilt is an important theme A Three Dog Life.
William Shakespeare is known for writing many popular plays and is thought to be the greatest writer of English Literature. In Shakespeare’s work Much Ado About Nothing the Count Claudio was to marry Hero, but the prince’s brother, Don John, deceived Claudio into thinking Hero was impure. Although the Friar knew better and convinced Claudio otherwise. While this is the main idea, this essay is on a less major topic. It is on the foil characters Dogberry and the Friar.
“Wag the Dog” is a humorous movie. The fact that the movie is based on a fake war in Albania encouraged me to watch it. This movie is based on a Hollywood film producer who constructs a fake war with Albania to distract the electorates from a sex scandal days before the presidential election. The president of the United States is discovered making sexual advances, less than two weeks before Election Day, on an underage girl in the oval office.
I prefer to name it as a Safety coat, by the way what does dog’s safety means?, may be it means protect your dog from car or hunting accidents, or from the weather to keep your dog dry during wet walking in rain or snow.
The tone of this story is one of fear, regret, and guilt. The story first leaves the reader with impression that it may be a recount of the life of a daughter who was lost due to neglect. Soon it is evident
The story develops two old college friends gathering for a chat, in a week afternoon, talking for hours straight. During this period there is abusive alcohol consumption, a robust evidence of personal problems. The conversation evolves around gossip and complains. It is Eloise, the protagonist, who complains the most throughout the whole story, and about every aspect of her current life. Including her own daughter, which until that moment she barely considers as her descendent: “I need a cocker spaniel or something” (24). Even though the text only brings up the distinct appearances between them, Eloise believes Ramona is so far apart from her that anything would be closer to her – even a dog.
The Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie The Hound of the Baskervilles directed by Jeremy Bret are two works of art that are mainly telling the same story. There are, however, many differences about the book and the movie. Those differences don’t affect the outcome of the story, but they give less impact to the story. Along with the differences there are many similarities, and those similarities give you confidence that it is the same story.
Have you ever considered where your thoughts about a particular person or place originates? What makes you feel the way you do when you see an image of a particular type of person? Many scholars are in agreement that most of our ideas about others stem from what meaning our culture has placed on people of that demographic (Hall, 1997). These meanings are not always communicated in an outright way but subtly over extended periods of time and frequent exposure. For instance, there was not a time when your parent pointed to a picture of a squirrel and said, “nut” or “tree”. What typically happens is that every time a child sees a squirrel, they are forging for seeds or running up and down a tree. After witnessing a squirrel involved in this action two or three dozen times, the child begins to associate the squirrel with those particular actions. As the child’s brain begins to organize information for easy access the image of the squirrel is placed into a mental box with trees, seeds, and warmer weather. This process provides the child with a conceptual idea or representation (Hall, 1997) of a squirrel in order to know how to conduct herself when squirrels are around.
He glanced in my direction, saw nothing of interest there, and padded to my mother’s sleeping form, leaning towards her face. Staring at her, he took a deep breath and shook her. She awoke with a gasp, the of kind one that emits when a child is about to pull a pot of boiling water onto its head, and whispered fiercely, “What is it?” She had gone, in that instant, from being concerned about the pot of water, to becoming the pot of water: Her usually loving voice turned fixedly dangerous, and I am sure my brother, being astute, saw the imminent explosion in her eyes. Her tone reminded him that his reason for startling her better be good, or he was about to taste some serious pain. She was angry, and why not? My brother had been fired from his job that day for theft of services: giving away toys at his game stand at the local amusement park to those who had not necessarily earned them, and my mother had been furiously livid towards his attitude. My brother and her have had many grievances before, over school, issues at home, in life, but always he managed to bring a smile to her scowling lips and the two reconciled for a time. But now, she spoke again, and the sultry room seemed cool, stiff with her words, and I could almost see the “What?” hovering between them. His reply, which was simple and calm, made me feel my soul scratching at my ribcage and pounding the walls of my body, rushing to leave me at it 's
Made of hard plastic with floppy ears, a button nose, and splotches of brown decorating its body, was a toy dog I dubbed Puppet. The plastic dog was meant to be named Puppy, however I couldn’t say it quite right and the mispronounced name simply stuck with him. Given by my mother as a first birthday gift, I became adamant on not letting puppet out of my sight. Because of this fierce sense of protection, every night I would hunt him down, wrap him in my meager baby arms, and fall fast asleep. Some found it odd a young child was sleeping with a dog made of hard plastic, but because I grew up with him I preferred him over any regular teddy bear. Puppet
In the narration, “The Three-Legged Who Carried Me,” Laurie Lambeth uses rhetoric to make an effective argument. Lambeth begins with describing her own life, then her dog, Patou’s life, and finally to how both of their lives were intertwined in more ways than one. Within her narration she argues, “All creatures who persist are whole” (Lambeth, paragraph 24). By using narration, diction, and compare and contrast throughout her article, she is able to strengthen her argument in order to persuade readers that despite all hardships one may endure, all those who continue on are whole.