Pure Democracy Or Tyranny

Every form of government is bound to have some shortfalls. Different people have different views about the various political systems. But in today's world, democracy is considered to be the best form of government, reason being that people are treated equally and have full rights to live a life of their liking. Unlike a Oligarchy government is not considered to be a

Some people may ask, Who is Winston Churchill ? Winston Churchill was the prime minister of Great Britain. He led britain to the victory over Nazi Germany in World War II. Churchill served in the british army and worked as a writer before going into politics.He is also a celebrated artist, author, and public speaker. He made several statements about government, life, and war. He was born into an aristocratic family, November 30, 1874. As he grew older he took his father traits, Lord Randolph Churchill, a British statesman from an England family. I believe churchill has the authority to discuss the quote because he is the prime minister of Great Britain.

Democracy doesn’t protect the rights of each citizen and his or her property. Republic, on the other hand, does. Why is this better? Protected rights are more beneficial to the citizens. A simple majority vote can not change Citizens' rights. In a Democracy, rights of the majority can overwhelm the rights of the minority. For example, if the citizens voted on taking someone’s property, the government wouldn’t protect that person’s rights. There would be nothing stopping the citizens from taking away his or her rights. This isn’t fair and isn’t good for the

In May of 1787 a Constitutional Convention was call by 55 individuals in Philadelphia. Most of them were wealthy, all of them were white and all were male. Elven of the eastern seaboard came, but Hampshire delegates would not show till July and Rhode Island was not showing up at all.The call this meeting because the constitution or the article of confederation, just wasn’t working. In this Article there was no chief executive, there were no court system there was not even a way for the central government to force state to pay taxes. So they created a new constitution and with this the central movement had the power necessary if the new nation was to hold together.

Which system is better, a Democracy or Constitutional Republic? At first, it might seem that Democracy is the better system, as it gives the people a better voice in government. However, Democracy has some serious weaknesses. It enables the majority to totally dominate and oppress the minority (Hospers). As was seen with Socrates, the minority is not protected in a democracy. Because, in a true democracy, there is no check on the power of the masses, it is as if there is no rule save for mob rule. A good orator, such as Alcibiades, architect of the disastrous attack on Syracuse, could manage to sway the masses into making unwise decisions. Perhaps democracy's greatest flaw

Is Absolutism a better form of government than a Representative Democracy? It most definitely is! Absolutism has existed for hundreds of thousands of years for a reason; This is because Absolutism runs more fluidly, Most absolute rulers are good leaders and can help make a society thrive, and votes of a representative democracy can be tampered with give unjust rulers. Many people believe that absolutism helps a political system run more efficiently, this meaning with one ruler things will get done because there is no one arguing with that ruler's power.

It turns out that John McCain’s most important service to American democracy was not rendered in a P.O.W. camp in Vietnam. It’s being rendered right now in the U.S. Senate.

The history of a country is usually deep and complex. This is the same for the United States. The U.S history is very complex with lots of history, including the making of the U.S constitution. The making of our “rulebook” was important because it fixed issues with the Article of Confederation. But, we needed a way to fix the problem of Tyranny. And they did. I think the Government stopped tyranny by Separating powers, checks and balances, and keeping Voting Amounts inline.

Representative Democracy is better for the United States than a Direct Democracy. Democracies are based on the citizen’s ability to judge things such as laws, propositions, bonds, budgets, representatives, and candidates. The type of democracy helps determine what the citizens are judging. In a direct democracy citizens would be judging the candidates and issues themselves and in a representative democracy, the citizens are judging the representatives and their ability to stay true to the citizens wants and needs. The founding fathers were so sure in their decision to make a representative democracy that they deliberately made ratifying the constitution very difficult.

For my Unit One Essay, I have decided to write about the word “tyranny”. The two dictionaries I have chosen for this assignment were Merriam-Webster, and American Heritage Dictionary given from freedictionary.com, both on line dictionaries. Merriam-Webster’s definition of the word tyranny says, “the cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over other”, and “a government in which all power belongs to one person”. The Free Dictionary’s definition of the word tyranny is, “a government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power”. They both could tie into each other if someone that had power in a government and would treat the people with cruelty or unfair treatment.

Although some states have provisions for Direct Legislation, through popular initiative and ballot vote. This permits citizens the chance to gather appeals, which require a similar topic to the 2014 issue regarding legalizing marijuana. Which can be carried directly to the electors for a decision. Our Founding Fathers figured out that the right to disapproval is very essential in order. To sustain political independence, even where a ballot box is accessible. Race, Ethnicity, Religion, Age, Geography, Social-economic Status, Population, and Representation all play an important role in our Government. The role they play might be played through voting. A Republic bases their opinions on ideals. Whereas a Democracy bases their views on privileges.

Democracy is a form of government which dominates the western world. In democracy, every person is given equal input into matters of the state, although this does happen to varying degrees. There exist many different types of democracy. Absolute or direct democracy occurs when each citizen personally participates in all decision-making processes. This system is difficult to maintain due to the vast number of people and the necessity for all people to be informed, logical, and educated when making many decisions. This form of democracy has not existed in significant sized populations. Representative democracy is a type of government in which the people elect government officials to make decisions concerning the state. The two most prevalent types of representative democracy are democratic republics and parliamentary democracies. In a democratic republic, such as the United States or Canada, the people elect both their representatives in government and their head of state. In a parliamentary democracy, such as the United Kingdom or Australia, the people elect their representatives and their representatives elect their head of state.

Democracy was the style of government system that the founding fathers pick for the nation. As it been used by other nations before and was a better system of government than tyranny. The ancient Greeks had a system of government that made them “famous for practicing direct democracy, a system in which citizens meet to discuss all policy, and then make decisions by majority rule. “(What is a democracy, para.4). The founding father used democracy as the form of government as would be the only good one, yet would use representative’s democracy to have elected leader by the people rule the government to be successful. At the time, the founding father thought that republic democracy would be the best form of government for the nation to be able

The relationship between economic growth and democracy has long been discussed and dissected ever since the beginning of the French Revolution and the democratization of Europe through the 18th and 20th centuries with various revolutions occurring, mostly in revolt to the overt dominance of the upper classes. Yet, no concrete answer has been defined on whether democracy directly increases economic growth, or that any non-democratic systems are strictly better at growing an economy. In this paper, there will be an examination of how despite no concrete definite answers about the correlation between democratic regimes and economic prosperity/growth exist, democracy still heavily encourages and enables for a maximized economic growth compared to totalitarian or monarchical regimes, through some main principles that define a democratic regime: Rule of law, legitimate authority, quality of governance, and participation of citizens, by means of humane work conditions, equal participation among classes, governance motivating the workforce, and less effort and money expunged towards legitimacy. Economic growth shouldn’t necessarily come before democracy as democracy facilitates and potentially maximizes economic growth.

Normative democratic theory deals with the moral foundations of democracy and democratic institutions. It is distinct from descriptive and explanatory democratic theory. It does not offer in the first instance a scientific study of those societies that are called democratic. It aims to provide an account of when and why democracy is morally desirable as well as moral principles for guiding the design of democratic institutions. Of course, normative democratic theory is inherently interdisciplinary and must call on the results of political science, sociology and economics in order to give this kind of concrete guidance.