Purpose Of ESSA

On this momentous occasion, President Barack Obama signed into law the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015. This measure was meant to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 that was introduced during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society Reform. Most importantly, for Americans, it replaced the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) instituted during the presidency of George W. Bush. The Every Student Succeeds Act was touted by lawmakers for returning power back to the states by taking a more flexible approach to student testing and school accountability. This measure is a step in the efforts to return American to its place as a leader in education worldwide, but this bill is not without its pundits as well.

“The NCLB law­—which grew out of concern that the American education system was no longer internationally competitive­­—significantly increased the federal role in holding schools responsible for the academic progress of all students. And it put a special focus on ensuring that states and schools boost the performance of certain groups of students, such as English-language learners, students in special education, and poor and minority children, whose achievement, on average, trails their peers.” (Klein). In 1965, ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act) was introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society Program to create a clear understanding of the Federal Government in K-12 school policy, which provided more that $1 billion

President Obama signed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) on December 10, 2015. This Act advances the 52-year-old, Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) that was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson in an attempt to provide quality education to all students regardless of race or ethnicity, language, disability, or family income. Viewed as a civil rights law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act further advanced equality in education; yet it’s very cumbersome requirements became untenable for schools and educators. Viewed as a natural progression of two very successful previous acts, the ESSA was designed to provide further equal opportunity for all students. However, Florida passed their required state version that has

"Making Sure That Schools Measure Up." Education Week, vol. 36, no. 16, 4 Jan. 2017, pp. 18-20. EBSCOhost. PDF. In this periodical article, Alyson Klein, reporter for Education Week, reflects on Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), an update to the K-12 education law, in the one year since it was passed in 2016. Klein discusses how the ESSA was designed to improve shortcomings of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), the previous version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Klein also examines concerns over greater flexibility given to states and districts regarding issues such as standardized test, school choice, marginalized students. The Obama administration wrote how the accountability portion of the law would work, allowing states to pick their own goals, both a long term goal and short term goals. These goals must address students’ proficiency on tests, English-language proficiency, and graduation

On December 10, 2015 President Obama signed Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). This act was a replacement for No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. NCLB was a representation of the nation’s goals under president George Bush in which all children would be offered support in order to flourish academically. While ESSA has the same groundwork as NCLB Act, the government anticipates greater academic merit. Only time will tell if this will prove true, nevertheless ESSA will significantly change educational approaches in the upcoming years.

A Title I school is eligible to become a Title I School-wide Program when the poverty level, (determined by free and reduced meal counts, Aid for Dependent Children [AFDC], census, or Medicaid) is at or above 40%. "Title I" is the federal program that provides funding to local school districts to improve the academic achievement of disadvantaged students. It is part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act first passed in 1965. That Act is reauthorized by Congress from time to time, and often given a new name. It is currently known as the No Child Left Behind Act.

Title III law is on language instruction for limited English proficient and immigrant students. Title III is part of the no child left behind act. The Act states that LEP students must not only attain English proficiency but simultaneously meet the same academic standards as their English-speaking peers in all content areas. Federal funding is given to meet these requirements. There are also regulations regarding parent communication. Any school receiving title III funds is obligated to inform families and communities of LEP and immigrant children about their ESL programming and how they can assist in their child’s progress (Wikipedia 2016). Also, schools are required to provide communication in the family’s native language.

The ESEA Act of 1965 was enacted to offer equal educational opportunities to children from low income students with the help of Title 1 being the largest source of funding. With the help of Title 1 the schools would be able to provide supplemental services to these children. In Contrast, The NCLB Act requires states to use standardized test to test students in reading, math and science to see if academic progress is made and the students are proficient in grade level of these subjects. The NCLB Act also focused on eliminating socioeconomic and racial differences providing quality education to all students of America regardless of ethnic, socioeconomic and racial background. Whereas the ESEA Act only focused on low income family students, the NCLB Act included low- income students, students with disabilities, major racial and ethnic groups and English language learners by providing test results to show improvement and that each student reach the appropriate grade level performance. (Thomas & Brady, 2005, p. 51-56). Furthermore, A blueprint for Reform: The Reauthorization of the ESEA differed by focusing on “moving from a punishment based system to a system that rewarded students and teachers for excellent teaching and student growth” (Woolfork, 2014, p.X). In Comparison, all of these educational policies have the same goal which is to improve the educational experience of students in all areas and populations. These policies help with the effectiveness of teaching learning

The state and federal government student’s success acts were changed from the No Child Left Behind [NCLB] act which address the state accountability holding all school districts responsible for students learning (U.S. Department of Education, 2017). However; the NCLB Act was replaced in 2015 with the ESSA Act which stand for Every Student Succeeds Act and is federally mandated to support best practices for all types of learners from k-12th grades offering additional support (U.S. Department of Education, 2017)). The plan also addresses accountability measures in low achieving schools where students are not graduating at their assigned cohort. (U.S. Department of Education,

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) was established by President Obama. ESSA replaces the No Child Left Behind Act. EESA was said to be implemented in schools in the 2017-2018 school-year. The main goal of ESSA is to assist in strengthening the middle social class, thus building stronger schools. This legislation is said to ensure that students that graduate high school are ready for college, maintain accountability, so that no child is left behind, make sure standardized testing doesn’t interfere with teaching, provide more children with high- quality preschools, give more power to state and local decision makers, and establish new resources for teaching and testing. Every Student Succeeds Act removed the excessive certifications requirements

In recent weeks, a bipartisan piece of legislation designed to “fix” NCLB was signed into law by President Obama. The “Every Student Succeeds Act” or ESSA is said to be a reprieve from the provisions of NCLB. Its framework is designed to empower states and allow them to redirect resources how they see fit to address student and school needs.

The Local Control of Education Act was introduced by Sen. Vitter, David [R-LA] on January 7th, 2015. This act aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), which prohibits the federal government from directly or indirectly mandating, directing, controlling, incentivizing, or conditioning federal support on a state 's, local educational agency 's (LEA 's), or school 's adoption of: the Common Core State Standards, any other academic standards common to a number of states, or any statewide or nationally recognized content standards; or any assessment, instructional content, or curriculum aligned to, or based on, specific academic standards.

Every Student Succeeds Act was a new law that was signed into legislation in 2015 by President Barak Obama. ESSA is a biparty educational reform law was designed from several aspects of No Child Left Behind. The United States Department of Education (2015) stated that ESSA focuses on factors such as, advancing equity for the nations disadvantaged students by investing more in preschool programs, local innovations, reporting student progress on all high stakes assessments to all stakeholders and promoting of college and career readiness by increasing rigor and reporting student progress on all high stakes test and assessments to all stakeholders. Furthermore, it replaced NCLB that was signed into law under

With the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) being a reform of the No Child Left Behind Act, it is necessary to explore the viewpoints of those affected by the policy. Doing so helps in determining the number of individuals who believe the policy is successful/unsuccessful at this point. Those affected by the policy can include, but not limited to: Teachers, parents, students, and education board leaders etc. Providing this information helps conclude what needs to change about the policy if majority rule in favor of reforming the act. This allows the administration to better educate students, providing the tools necessary for them to succeed beyond head start.

The No Child Left Behind Act should tremendously be re-examined and amended because the focus on the standardized tests decrease the quality of other subjects not on the tests, the tests are not an efficient tool to make certain that a student is receiving an excellent education and the tests create unnecessary stress for the students, teachers and administrators. The purpose of No Child Left Behind is to provide every student with the opportunity to receive a top-grade education. This is a great proposal to strive towards but, legislation plans on achieving this proposal by making schools responsible for their students’ proficiency and to measure their proficiency with the use of standardized tests. After the students take the