preview

Q Value Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document

Starting November 3rd, samples were collected from Lake Storey Park in Galesburg, IL. Samples were taken weekly from various locations in the water as to achieve a complete depiction of the entire body of water. The first sample provided evidence that the water was of “Average” quality. The dissolved oxygen was measured 100.6 % saturated by a Vernier Optical Dissolved Oxygen Probe, a fairly normal level for water. Using the Water Quality Value Charts provided by the Georgia Virtual School, the measurement of dissolved oxygen was correlated on the chart with a “Q-Value” of 100. Since the Q-Value was discovered, determining the Subtotal of the test was the next step. To determine the Subtotal, the Q-Value of the given measurement must be multiplied …show more content…

The Subtotals summed to 54.9 and the Weighing Factors summed to .58. The lab report provided by the Illinois Virtual School indicated that the Weighing Factors needed to be divided by the Subtotals; however, if that were to be calculated, then the final number would always be a decimal. The number would not be even close to the Water Quality Assessment Values provided in the lab report; therefore, the sum of the Subtotals was concluded to be the number that would be used in the final assessment. Lake Storey, having a Subtotal of 54.9 correlated with the 51 – 70 Final Water Quality Value, which indicates that the water quality of Lake Storey was considered “Average” according to the Illinois Virtual School AP Environmental Science’s Lab …show more content…

The dissolved oxygen level reached its highest levels in week 3 at a percent saturation of 102.7. While the dissolved oxygen increased, the pH dropped to 6.96, the temperature changed dropped to 8.1oC, and the total phosphate levels declined to -.02 mg/L PO4-. Even though the dissolved oxygen levels increased during week 3, the Q-Value was still at 100, just like all of the previous weeks, which indicates that the dissolved oxygen levels were not affected during and after the harvest. The pH value from week 3 has declined to a Q-Value of 88, the lowest of all three samples. Beings that the pH levels were at a Q-Value of 90 the first week, the week of the harvest, 95 Q-Value the next week, and 88 the final week, it seems as if the pH levels were stable before and after the harvest. Appropriately, the data could represent the fact that more chemicals were released during the harvest, increasing the pH levels than in the other two

Get Access