QLD Law Essay

The case Jonah v White (2011) 45 Fam LR 460, was first brought forward by Ms Jonah, seeking her relationship with Mr White be recognised as de-facto in order to apply for a property

2. Is there evidence of disparate impact against African Americans in the decisions that were made? On what basis did you arrive at this position? Illustrate how the “80 percent rule” can be used with the data in Exhibit 3.2.1 and whether there was a violation of this rule.

6.What is the level of court, the case is being heard in? 2 marks (1 mark each article)

In this case, Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 129 the plaintiff is identified as Roy “Dutch” Kennedy on behalf of Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy and the defendant is the NSW Minister for planning . The case was heard in the NSW Land and Environment Court by Justice Biscoe. The applicant is lodging a review, and thus challenging the grounds of the original decision in relation to the legality of an administrative decision by the Minister for the Stockland’s Developments Pty Ltd.

Provided Case 09-3, we, Group 7 have dutifully researched the topic, using resources at our disposal to formulate a consistent, clear and legal response. The following submission outlines the case, our conclusions with supporting evidence and the accounting issues present in the subject.

If the Plaintiff had brought her request before this Court pursuant to Section 12-103 of the Family Law Article this

Q. What are the Plaintiffs’ counsel’s responses to “Hearsay” objections that may be raised by the City’s Attorney.

Question: Was there probable cause to arrest and prosecute the plaintiffs in the previous criminal proceeding?

Since the early 1990s, Australian judicial system has experienced a great flux revolving around the notion of good faith in the performance the enforcement of contracts. The leading case Renard Construction (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (Renard) along with Preistly JA’s judgment commenced the controversial introduction of universal obligation of good faith in all contracts. Such introduction was also confronted by the opposing force of the more conservative judgments, such as those of Meagher JA in Renard and Gummow J in Service Station Association v Berg Bennett & Associates Pty Ltd . In order to correctly assess the extent to which the High Court of Australia should recognize that in all contracts, parties

Critical Legal Thinking Which of the following three legal theories did the Court apply in making its decision in this case?

In the Supreme Court of Queensland, appellants claim that Bill made the will under excessive influence from Neil York and unreasonable. It was unsuccessful because Jersey claims that the evidence suggests that Bill did not act under any influence from Neil and he followed his wishes.

Lord Scarman, Woodar Investment Development Limited v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 All ER 571

The question is presented in a collection of sentences describing a hypothetical scenario involving parties in situations giving rise to legal rights and liabilities, and requiring for specific legal issues to be addressed in a specific manner. It is made up of two basic components, which are the situation and the instruction. The situation is a long narrative containing facts and details of a sequence of events and references to the disputing parties whereas the instruction is the task to be undertaken for a specific party or parties, usually in the nature of legal advice. Hence, in order for an answer to a legal problem question to be good, it must have addressed all relevant issues presented and applied the relevant laws to them in moving toward a legal solution in closing, all under the conventional writing practices of an academic law problem

Section one from the partnership act, section two rules, relevant case law and section twenty four default rules.

The respondent and the appellant were both working in a private company; the respondent was the personal officer, married with two children. The intimacy between them started increasing in 1992; thereafter the appellant left her job and decided to live with the respondent. The appellant held the stance that they used to run a business and earn profit from it, though after a while the respondent the business to his family residence and took the help of his son in continuance of the business, thereby depriving the appellant of the right to work.