Qué es el Desarrollo Humano?

Sociology is the study the different aspects of humanity and society. It encompasses a very broad and varying range of topics. It can be studied on a large world-wide scale spanning across several countries, which is called Macrosociology. It can also be studied on a small scale looking at only individual families or neighborhoods, which is called Microsociology. Not only does it peer into humans’ interactions with each other but examines why they act the way they do. It considers the environment, as well as how access to different luxuries can contribute to the people that we become. In this fascinating field there are three primary views on exactly what the fundamental driving force behind society is. Symbolic Interactionalism, the belief that symbols and the meaning that they are given, define how we will perceive life, in this philosophy these meanings are influenced by society and the events of individual lives. Functional Analysis, views society as any other organism, in this theory all parts of the whole must work together cohesively to function. Conflict theory takes a somewhat opposite view than Functionalism, this perspective suggests that rather than wanting to work in unison, society’s underlying motive is a power struggle for resources. Over the course of this paper the reader will explore these different perspectives.

When it comes to globalization, everyone may have a different vision of it’s outcome. For Marcelo Gleiser, the author of “Globalization: Two visions of the Future of Humanity”, a completely globalized world may result in a dystopia. In contrast, Jeffrey Wasserstrom, the author of “A Mickey Mouse Approach to Globalization” and Tanveer Ali, the creator of “The Subway Falafel Sandwich and the Americanization of Ethnic Food” may think of globalization as other cultures sharing each other’s components to interact on a new level and spurring a more “open-minded” (Ali 27) individual.

In a constant state of mental nepantilism, la mestiza is a product of the transfer of the cultural and spiritual values of one group to another. Cradled in one culture, sandwiched between two cultures, staddling all three cultures and their value systems, la mestiza undergoes a struggle of flesh, a struggle of borders, an inner war. Like all people, we recognize the version of reality that our culture communicates. The coming together of two self-consistent but habitually incompatible frames of reference causes a cultural collision. We attempt to block with opposition in terms of culture, but it is not enough to stand on opposite position. The counterstance refutes the dominant coulture’s view and beliefs, and, for this, they become someties aggressive, but it is not a way of life. Once we decide how we behave, there are enormous possibilities.

The article written by Peter Callero is based on the idea that globalization is involved in our everyday lives. The author relates this topic to how jobs are made in the United States or when their moved into another country. It refers to the effects of this move and how it changes the incomes of workers in our country.

When faced with inexplicable working conditions, one’s first consideration would be to quit their job and to find a new one. In the case of the factory workers at Hacienda Tijuana, a Mexican tortilla factory, that is certainly not the case. Throughout this article, there are many issues that are presented to the reader. This essay is structured to examine three of the main issues. It begins by looking at the exploitation of the women and their lack of rights as workers in the factory. It examines the analytical framework that would be most appropriate for this situation and then progresses to relate many sociological theories to this issue. Next, it examines the mostly negative effects of globalization, modernization and industrialization.

“All human societies reproduce themselves in this way through a process of ‘naturalization’. It is through this process- a kind of inevitable reflex of all social life- that particular sets of social relations, particular ways of organizing the world appear to us as if they were universal and timeless,” (142).

exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the

This chapter is essentially the start of course and meaning of global and global studies. It defines globalization “is the historical process through which the world is being made into one place with systematic properties." Moreover, the overall effect that it had. In addition, it mentions the first time that globalization has been used in the social sciences in the 1990s. Axford assumes that world is becoming one global world. That means peoples cultures and beliefs are being replaced by the new cultures and they are so call becoming one. It goes through the myth of globalization. The backlash of the globalization is capitalism and how it affects the world but on the other hand, the globalization is not just about the economy. Overall, this chapter wants to introduce the course to us and express the meaning and misunderstands about the world Globalization. In my idea, this is the best way to start the course because it gives me a grasp of over global studies.

The communitarian argument for a politics of the common good in order to develop and maintain social unity, is based on their idea that the self is constituted by the community. For them, it is not individuals who examine and define their own ends, as such ends have already been developed by, and exist within, a given community. According to communitarians, individuals discover their self by deeply immersing themselves in the community 's way of life, internalising the community 's conceptions of good, and embracing social roles that have been pre-determined by culture or custom – the promotion of which is the duty of the communitarian state. However, communitarians see their societies as vulnerable (Kymlicka 2002: 238), and that the vast array of ends in modern societies stand as a threat to the maintenance of social unity (Kymlicka 2002: 271). They assert that, without a politics of the common good to protect and solidify the ends of the community, social unity will be unsustainable (Kymlicka 2002: 271). One communitarian approach to combating this is through the distribution of resources, which the communitarian state undertakes in line with its preferences, in a bid to prevent individuals within the community from reconsidering or revising ends and the community 's conception of the good life (Kymlicka 2002: 240).

Human beings are social by nature. Necessity induces them to live in society. As, they have a variety of needs. If they lead a cooperative life with his fellow beings in society they can easily get their needs fulfilled. Many of their needs will remain unsatisfied if they does not lead a cooperative life with his fellow beings. They characteristically have a fundamental need and desire to maintain positive social relationships. As stated in the previous chapter, the new assemblages of relative deterritorialization has brought in several changes in the social and private lives of the characters. They are affected by the decay and disorder of their culture because of the social changes. They have been uprooted from the set beliefs and scattered

This passage is best categorized under sociology. The article fits into both social science and sociology because the two together are based upon the functionality of human relationships. Social sciences, however, focuses more on economics and politics, while sociology focuses on the problematic side of human relations.

and consciousness across world-time and world-space” (Steger). In other words, globalization applies to an arrangement of social procedures that seems to change our present social

Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.

These documents, at the same time, take back the sociopolitical thought that had been developped in a long tradition, and whose most striking stages are: the supreme value of reason as basis for any sociopolitical relation such as we discover at the Greek Polis and such as it is presented by the great thinkers Plato and Aristotle; the intrinsic value of human person, son of the same Christian God, and capable, because of his freedom, either of salvation or of condemnation, as it was understood by the main thinkers in the Middle Ages; the human Individual, considered as a juridical subject, capable of making contracts and assuming rights and duties and, therefore, as the last foundation of any sociopolitical organization, as he was thought by the liberal tradition embodied by Hobbes, Locke and the Encyclopedists. The concrete praxis of these theoretical principles in democratic societies and nations where the Individuals are the cause and the end of this sociopolitical order such as we find in Great Britain, Switzerland, Holland, USA, France, Sweeden, Norwegen, Canada and many other nations throughout the five continents.

El eje central de la comunicación (el qué), o cuál es el mensaje que se va a comunicar a un determinado público objetivo