Qualitative Data Collection

pain is the usual cause for persons to look for treatment. Inadequate pain management can cause delay in healing process. It can also leads to prolonged hospital stay. The acute pain management theory describe how nurse can manage pain with minimal effects from the pharmacological interventions and use of alternative methods of pain management (Good &Moore, 1996) The main factors are in the management of pain are Pharmacological, non-pharmacological, patient participation, education and different interventions. Effective pain management involves the application of non-pharmacological interventions and usage of pain medications. (McEwen & Willis, 2014). The pain management theory deals with management of pain in daily basis. It offers the knowledge about alternate methods in pain

Implementing a change project is a challenging step of the Capstone Change Project. This paper focuses on steps that must be taken to implement a change, strategies to ensure the success, involved stakeholders and their roles, educational requirements, safety issues, ethical considerations, and external or internal regulations’ effects on the process. It also include the change theory, nursing theory, and evidence based practice influences on the implementation process.

Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative methods on each of the elements listed. Please use scholarly, academic literature to support your response.

JCAHO (2011) also stated that patients and their families needed to be educated about pain and how the patients’ pain is going to be managed. Every patient perceives and exhibits pain in a different manner and if nurses do not assess the patient thoroughly they can miss it. For instance, Engebretson et al. (2006) acknowledged that, patients manifest pain in different ways and this resulted in nurses performing an inadequate assessment of their patients’ pain. Also, Engebretson et al. recognized that patients often conceal their pain because they do not want to be viewed by staff as complainers or addicts, and if patients decide to speak up the nurses frequently view their patients’ statements from their own cultural, moral and ethical belief system and not their patients which leaves the patients’ pain untreated.

Two types of data were collected through surveys, both before and after implementation of the combined approach (Sand-Jecklin and Sherman,2014). The first data was on nurses’ point of view with regards reporting process, and the second on patients view regrading nursing care. The baseline survey included 233 patients and 148 nurses, while the survey three months into the implementation period included 157 patients and 98 nurses. The final survey, 13 months into the impanation, was completed by 154 patients and 54 nurses. The patient survey also included responses from patient families. These were 70, 72, and 53 responses for baseline survey, three-month postimplementation surveys, and 13-month postimplementation surveys.

Evidence Based Practice is a principle that is centered on the improvement of patient care and outcomes, by introducing and researching current based evidence when making decisions for that patient. According to Johnston (2016), “Health-care practitioners are increasingly being encouraged to implement research evidence into practice in order to ensure optimal patient outcomes and provide safe, high-quality care”. Throughout the course of this class, whether it be from researching about Evidence Based Practice, or the implementation of nursing care delivery models, patient care and the way we treat our patients is at the forefront of change. We know that change is necessary, now it is just a matter of how to implement that change into the healthcare

Pain is one of the most common reasons people consult a physician, yet it is frequently inappropriately treated [St Stauver JL, 2013]. To deal with this dilemma, nurse practitioners can play an important role on the pain care team, particularly as primary care clinicians spend less time with patients and are increasingly reluctant to provide care for pain patients. As frontline providers, they can take the time to perform a thorough patient assessment and physical examination and follow through with pain treatment, while also playing an essential role in patient education and assessing and monitoring the patient’s opioid risk. Their primary goal is to develop a therapeutic relationship with patients, providing the time and space for patients to tell their pain story [Hughes, 2013], which they then can communicate to the rest of the team and which forms the basis for all subsequent decisions about treatment.

However, a better understanding of the factors that affect such knowledge and attitudes and of the discrepancy between attitudes and practice can provide useful information to be included in education programs for nurses and to inform policy on the provision of pain management. On the other hands (Rushton, Eggett, and Sutherland, 2003) stated that nurses do not use evidence-based practice in pain management consistently. Until recently there was no standard of care by which to judge the adequacy of pain management. Study findings support the premise that many nurses have inadequate knowledge about pain theory, assessment, and management strategies, especially pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. Importantly, study findings suggested that nurses do not objectively assess pain or individualize care plans for patients with pain complaints. In particular, nurses expect patients to tolerate pain, do not differentiate well between acute and chronic pain, consistently overestimate the incidence of narcotic addiction and malingering (i.e., false pain complaint), and tend to rate patients ' pain and related needs lower than patients themselves. Pain assessment is the first step in effective pain management and is an independent nursing function. It has been estimated that a significant number of problems with pain management relate to inadequate assessment (Clark et al., 1996). The research evidence suggests that nurses ' attitudes and beliefs constitute significant

The interventions will be aimed at reducing as far as possible all factors that decrease the threshold and promote those that increase it. It is of no use to judge the pain of others. Nursing care should recognize the presence of the painful experience of the patient, listen carefully and evaluate the factors that condition. Assess the response to analgesics as important as identifying the intensity of pain at the start of the intervention, it is reassessing its evolution time and under the treatment plan is implemented. In hospitalized patients should ask about pain at frequent intervals, every four hours or at least once per shift, and always after administration extra to check their adequacy and effectiveness dose. What drug it was effective and what dose is information that should not be left to memory for later transmission. Its systematic registration history is essential for inter-coordination. Moreover, the patient transmits real interest on the part of professionals and reinforces the therapeutic relationship and

I will methodically analyze all parts of the study to assess the validity of the article, by contrasting and comparing the information provided, with previous literature. I will try to make sure that recommendations provided by the authors are congruous with nursing practice and beneficial to the advancement of it. I will as much as possible provide in depth detail of previous studies on the same topic that either support or contradict the analysis provided by this study and its authors.

This study was little different from the previous studies as it was carried out by the student nurses. The students performed a research in collaboration with the faculty and unit to describe the root cause and provide recommendation on improving clinical documentation practices within the health care setting. This included describing the pain reassessment process or plan of care compliance. Six pilot units were selected within the healthcare system with a team or 4-5 students for each unit with a lead faculty for each team. Each faculty was responsible for the work of 3 student teams. 2 teams focused on the pain reassessment and one team on the plan of care documentation. Each student used about 8 hours of clinical hours for this project. The RCA teams met weekly to summarize the current status and develop data tools and recommendations on this project. The project process was completed in 3 phases: background overview, data collection and synthesis and project evaluation including recommendations. The total time to complete the project was approximately 7

Nurses have a unique role in alleviating the pain experienced by their patients. With their professional knowledge and regular close contacts with patients, they are ideally placed to listen and respond to any concerns. Taking time to assess the individual will allow for the development of a thrusting relationship between the nurse and patient. Accurate assessment and documentation can help to chart the multi- dimensional nature of the pain, aiding decision making and patient care planning (Mcguie 1992).

In order to provide the Australia Park Victoria with the appropriate data to solve its current crisis, the most appropriate method of data collection for this research is the qualitative method. According to Gay and Airasian (p 627) qualitative method is the collection of extensive data on various variables over a long time in a natural setting with an aim of acquiring insights not possible using other methods. It involves three different kinds of information collection: direct observation, in depth and open-ended interviews and written documents. Qualitative method involves use of random sampling and structured data collection instruments that fit different experiences. The method also enables the researcher to study the specific area of

Throughout this article, Robert Sutton summarizes his three-month qualitative study of data, in regards to the emotions that collectors emit to debtors. While analyzing the data provided by the facility manager, Sutton used seven methods in order to get a better understanding of how collectors emotions are transferred toward the particular debtor they are dealing with. These seven methods included: Interacting with a key informant, training as a collector, working as a collector, group interviews, supervisor interviews, observing collectors, and lastly, written materials. Sutton argues that maintaining norms about expressed emotions was a struggle for some of the collectors, as having the right tone of voice, including intensity and firmness,

The behavior was observed from a large sample of people. This included twenty people shopping alone and twenty people shopping in a group, for a total of forty subjects, each ranging in ages from approximately 19 to 40 years old. The subjects were observed from the time they entered the store until the time they left. The reasoning behind this was to see the buying behavior differences for the whole experience and figure out which areas of the store could be improved in order to appeal to groups of people shopping. The behaviors observed included the amount of time spent inside the store, the amount of money spent, the interactions with associates, and the areas of the stores that were navigated.