preview

Qualitative Research Critique

Decent Essays

Critique of Locsin, Kongsuwan & Nambozi (2009) “Ugandan Nurses' Experience Of Caring For Persons Dying From Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever ” Since the first appearance of the Ebola Hemorrhagic fever, numerous research studies have been created with the purpose of analyzing the course of the disease and its implications in the medical world. A Qualitative study written by Rozzano C. Locsin, Waraporn Kongsuwan, and Grace Nambozi in 2009, evaluates the experience of nurses caring for individuals dying from Ebola in Uganda. The purpose of this paper is to critique the study previously mentioned and provide a rationale for each section being criticized. Ebola Virus Title. Locsin, Kongsuwan & Nambozi (2009) selected a title that is simple to understand …show more content…

This section clearly and concisely summarizes the main features of the study. For instance, it contains the sample being tested; 15 Ugandan nurses , and includes the approach used by the researches at the time of comparing data in order to make conclusions. Also, it outlines some of the nurses’ experiences and recommendations given through out the study. Introduction. In this section, the researches inform the reader of the problem being examined and the main purpose of the study. Additionally, a background on Ebola is included as a method of informing the readers about the origin of the disease and past outbreaks. By doing this, the researches make sure that the main problem to study is unambiguously presented. Literature review. Even though various research studies about health care workers ‘exposure to patients diagnosed with Ebola in Uganda were analyzed, none of those specifically covered the experience of nurses. For instance, one study showed the phenomenon of “ waiting to know ” in health care workers in contact with Ebola patients. Basically , this study explored the feeling of those exposed to the disease and their view about anticipating death while hoping for life. Since this study and others mentioned through out the article cannot describe the role of the nurse, it could be said that the literature chose by the researches was not quite adequate to support this …show more content…

Locsin, Kongsuwan & Nambozi (2009) adequately described the population to study and the setting for the conduction of the research. Participants were chosen from three hospitals that had admitted infected patients during the pandemic of 2000 to 2001. In order to select the sample to study, the criteria at the time of selecting participants included; nurses who previously care for dying patients, were able to write their experience in English, and agreed to be in the study. The final sample for the study consisted of fifteen Ugandan nurses who worked in Ebola units. They were 14 females and 1 male between the ages of 28 years old and 53 years old. Their period of exposure to patient with Ebola ranged from 2 to 120 days. Even though the setting chosen for the collection of the sample was adequate for the study, the size of the sample may not represent what most nurses in Ugandan experienced. The researches should have chosen a bigger sample including the same number of females and males. In addition, they should have not requested as part of the criteria the ability of nurses to write in English. This requirement could have tremendously affected the amount of individuals willing to participate. Data collection and measure. The method of data collection for this qualitative research was narrative paradigm. Locsin, Kongsuwan & Nambozi (2009) asked each participant three questions in order to obtain written narratives of their experience. Even though this method

Get Access