Qualitative Research Methods

In this paper, the definition and description of what a case study is, what are some reasons for using a case study, what are some disadvantages and advantages of this approach? Also included in this paper I will talk about what are some of the ways a researcher can acquire information that can is used for a case study. A case study can be defined as a descriptive account of the behavior, history, and other relevant factors concerning a particular individual (Cozby, Bates, 2012).

In reference to the analysis process the author states that the interview were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Moreover, the investigator validated the data through multiple interviews and evaluated it for stability, consistency and dependability. For the detailed analysis the author used content analysis and constant comparative techniques. In addition to that a committee of experts performed an external audit to resolve the differences in the analysis process.

The method used for this qualitative study was in-depth interviews with open-ended questions. This was an appropriate method for the study performed. The data was not gathered through more methods to create triangulation (Zamanzadeh et al., 2015).

The participant was a white,50 years old British woman. Prior to the interview an informed consent permitting the use of the material was signed. Participant was also informed of right to withdraw at any time and her right to decide for any data to be destroyed. After the interview the participant was debriefed and given a chance to give feedback and discuss her feelings about the experience.

The author’s development of explaining the theory and validity of the research had minimum thorough explanation. The results were provided through quantitative means instead of qualitative. This is not an issue; however, this could have been studied

Qualitative research reflects different ways that researcher’s collect data and explore all of the information through literature review. Participant’s that are reviewing is often observed for analysis while “the role of the researcher focuses as the primary data collection instrument necessitates the identification of personal values, assumptions and biases at the outset of the study; Qualitative researchers ask at least one central question” (Creswell, 2014, which can be explored in several contexts with further questions. According to the text Research Design (2014) “the researcher’s role is typically involved in a

Written informed consent was obtained prior to interviewing participants, the researchers further de-identified interview texts for the study.

Research questions in case study design begin with ‘how and why’ (Yin, 2003) and determine the type of case study. The main function of the questions is to keep the researcher focused and on track (Zucker, 2001).The following questions fit the planned instrumental, and exploratory/descriptive single case study design:

This section of the article shall address the approach used in the case study, providing explanations of the preferred research method, sample details, variables under examination, data collection

• Ensuring they deal professionally with any identified relationship difficulties or conflicts of interest. Considering carefully the impact on themselves, the coachee, the organisation where appropriate seeking guidance

The authors used participant observation and interview to do this research. I think the method of field work that provided the most insightful information was the method of participant observation. By

8. Following the role-play, the Employee participant is to complete the Coaching Session 1 – Observer’s

There are a variety of ways for researchers to do so, as validity is a very important component of any qualitative research method, including case studies. Combining research methods is a considerable way to ensure validity. This concept can be described as triangulation, which is when multiple methods are conducted in order to gather data, and these contrasting methods produce the same outcome (Tracy, 2010). Within triangulation a minimum of three varying methods must be used in order to ensure validity (Tracy, 2010). There are four subgroups of triangulation, which include data triangulation, method triangulation, investigative triangulation and theory triangulation, each of them being a significant way to ensure validity in case study research (Berg & Lune, 2016). Triangulation is a method that ensures no threats to the validity of the case study and is an important factor for researchers to consider when conducting their case study (Berg & Lune, 2016). In their research, Martins and Wilson (2012), demonstrate triangulation, as they used multiple coders to analyze the data to ensure the results were conclusive. This is a prime example of how triangulation can be used in research to ensure validity, in this case using inter-coder reliability as a means to achieve this (Martins & Wilson,

Interviews have been realized to relevant professionals involved in this business and tend to widely assess important factors for our analysis. The interviews have been limited in time, in order

This was a mixed- triangulated study using both qualitative (case study observation) and quantitative methodology..