Quality Management Assessment Summary HCS/451 - Health Care Quality Management and Outcomes Analysis Monday February 18th, 2013 Darlene Cantu Quality Management Assessment Summary A quality management plan is employed by an organization to define how processes are conducted, organize how procedures that make up processes are done, and evaluate past performance to determine what should be done differently to enhance future performance and outcomes. The process of an evaluation helps to ensure that the highest potential is reached in each set of circumstances. A quality management plan should pursue to oversee how complications are dealt with and to reassess such impediments afterwards to ascertain if alterations or modifications to …show more content…
As the hospital seeks to deliver exceptional patient care, a quality management program must also confirm that laws and regulations are obeyed, liability and losses are controlled, and that revenues progressively grow. In the process of creating this plan, the administration sets short-term goals that will lead to the realization of defined long-term goals. Short-Term Goals 1. Increase and sustain patient care ratings 2. Improve productivity 3. Develop and execute a defined strategy to be in compliance with approaching government regulation and law changes that affect the health care industry Long-Term Goals 1. Earn and preserve a positive reputation with excellence in patient care and safety 2. Lower losses from incurred liability below a defined limit 3. Grow net profit at a sustained pace Fundamental Quality Management Policies To create, launch, and sustain an effective quality management program it is crucial that a ground work of fundamental policies be established and adhered to. Policies direct everyone within the hospital in order to accomplish the organization’s goals and mission. Fundamental Quality Management Policies 1. The safety of patient and employees is always the primary priority and is the responsibility of everyone
Patient safety is number one in hospitals. Every staff member that comes into contact with a patient should always have the question, “Will the patient be safe?” in the back of
When I just looked at the title of this book “If Disney Ran Your Hospital 9 1/2 Things You Would Do Differently”, I was pretty skeptical. “No way. A hospital is neither a fun place nor entertainment. We deal with lives. Responsibility is huge.” But, Mr. Fred Lee, the author of this book, was very well aware of that. He hit every single point I wanted to argue. Going to read the book, a lot of relevant memories came up in my mind since I had worked for a hospital for a long time. I was convinced that Disney’s approach to quality improvement is applicable to hospital management. Out of 9 1/2 things, I would like to talk about three actions that left marks on me with my experience: service vs. experience, rewards to motivate people and closing the gap between knowing and doing.
NHS quality improvement programs main purpose is to collect and review data entered in order to recognize the opportunities to improve business operations in healthcare. To bring changes in quality, it is necessary to respond to patient’s ideas and implement them for the better results. The key issues that are to be considered for quality-improvement NHS program, as it moves forward are the needs for the patients, necessity of the funds for quality improvements, needs of the service providers and expectations of the community. Outcomes for people and also change expertise. And to improve business operations in healthcare and also recognize opportunities.
Various internal and external factors influence quality management and outcomes in hospital organizations. One internal factor that affects quality management and outcomes is leadership within the organization. Leadership is important to have successful quality management outcomes because if the leadership does not support it, no change within the organization will be successful. “This commitment must be shared by the board of trustees and all senior clinical and administrative managers and understood that it is a long-term process” (Chassen and Leob, 2011). Leadership is one of the most influential internal parts of the quality management program. Leadership can either help the organization succeed with their support or help the organization fail if they do not support and follow
As a new manager of an organization, I would first take a look at the organization’s entire infrastructure, and then evaluate the total quality management system that was implemented into that organization’s configuration. I would then implement my own infrastructure such as the Pareto run chart or subsequent cascading charts. I would create a quality development team that’s dedicated to instituting quality upgrades (a quality council). The quality council would have subcommittees that would be in control of managing and communicating total quality developments throughout the organization; reassuring duties such as project development teams, quality development managers, a quality training program, and planning development training (Goetsch
Quality management is essential to the success of the quality improvement of the health care industry. “Management uses management and planning tools to organize the decision making process and create a hierarchy when faced with competing priorities “( Ransom, et al., 2008). Quality measures should have these goals: effective, safe, efficient, patient-centered, equitable, and timely care (Quality Measures, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2011).
At Fort Madison Community Hospital they are focus at continuing improving quality service and managing care within the facility. To do this they have to measure accurately by different methods of quality improvement strategies. The managers also have to look at information technology applications and use benchmarking, milestones to help manage quality improvement to have a more effective facility.
In any continuous quality improvement effort, measurement is the key element (Sollecito, & Johnson, 2013). “Measurement and statistical analysis are used to assess the impact of an improvement effort” (Sollecito & Johnson, 2013). To Measure the impact of the program, the hospital utilized a departmental quality improvement assessment with a scoring matrix for self-assessment (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012). The scoring matrix consisted of five category ratings which each department head had to complete. Univer4sal Charting and Resource Utilization were also used for measurement (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012).
Improving the quality of health care system is the main goal of this organization. In this case study we will be talking about the strategic plans being made by the organization for the next decade to deal with the problems of resource management, network growth, patient satisfaction as well as nurse staffing. The readiness of the organization towards catering the citizens' needs for health care will also be discussed in this case study (Goetsch and Davis, 2010).
Time and again, hospitals are often called upon to improve the quality of its various health care activities in order to better serve patients and immediate communities. A quality improvement plan thus helps in the selection of high priority areas and the utilization of evidence-based practices in conducting the improvement (Berenguer et al., 2010). In view of the healthcare improvement needs of Sunlight Hospital, this paper seeks to classify and justify five measurements of quality of care in a hospital, specify the four main features in a health care organization that can be used in the design of a quality improvement plan, and suggest the salient reasons quality of care would add value and create a competitive advantage
Healthcare providers strive to improve service quality by implementing various quality management programs. Customers tend to seek for higher quality of care when choosing treatments, providers, and health plans. For healthcare organizations that desire to provide high quality care and compete in the global market, choosing a quality management program to implement is critical for performance and efficiency. Many studies have been conducted to analyze the effectiveness of such programs. Lean, Six Sigma and Total Quality Management (TQM) are three programs that will reviewed by three different case studies in efforts to understand them and to compare and contrast their capabilities.
Inadequate nursing care can be a result of staffing issues or under educated nurses. Errors can be made that not only affect the patient’s well-being, but can affect the financial standing of a hospital. Creating a business case for quality, would make changes benefitting the hospital as a whole. This paper will describe the current situation in need of change, discuss the proposed program, and provide a market analysis, an implementation plan, a timeline for implementation, and an evaluation plan, including relevant financial data of the proposed program.
Description of how Woolworths manages quality and determine how effective Woolworths is at managing quality.
Quality is something that every health care agency strives to achieve. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests that health care organizations develop a culture of safety such that an organization's care processes and workforce are focused on improving the reliability and safety of care for patients (Groves, Meisenbach, & Scott-Cawiezell, 2011). In order to address an issue related to health care quality, it is important to look at the frameworks that will analyze an organization and identify opportunities to improve performance. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of an organization and an analysis of the following: mission, vision and values, strategic plan, goals,
External customer requirements may be gathered and transformed into specific, actionable process improvements using quality function deployment, a well- structured product development process which dictates what the market requires into a program to create, manufacture, and deliver it. However, teams should collaborate to arrive at a common understanding of the customer needs and determine the appropriate technical requirement of each stage. As soon as customer expectations are met, customer satisfaction will improve, resulting in a take-back of market share and an increase in revenue.