The World Health Organization’s quality of life survey allowed me to explore the meaning of well-being in my life. From physical health and psychological health to social relationships and environmental health, many aspects of well-being were assessed and examined. I learned that well-being in not just ones physical well-being but an accumulation of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health. I did, however, find that the assessment did not completely analyze the well-being of my life and others. For example, the questions were often ambiguous and I did not completely understand all off them. With more specification to the questions a more accurate assessment could have been taken. I also believe that a few essential …show more content…
Adjusting to my life as a college freshman is stressful and this could account for physical and psychological health being my lowest domains. From making new friends to adjusting to a new environment with different social customs, things are just different and it takes its toll on my physical and psychological state of well-being. Although, it is also important to note that a transformed score of 14 out of 20 is still relatively high and I would consider my overall state of well-being to be very good and above average as compared to the majority of the world. My two highest domains tied with scores of 16 out of 20 are social and environmental health. I would also attribute this to my new college environment. Being in college allows me to constantly have social interactions and thus improves my social relationships. My environmental quality is also improved by being in the college setting because of my access to financial resources, freedom, transportation, etc. Overall, being in the college environment has both negative and positive impacts on my well-being, as any situation in life
- Wellbeing is the condition or state of a human being, animal or plant. There are five types of wellbeing…
Many people don’t comprehend, and much of the time underestimate, the hugeness of good well being. Well being, as is commonly said, is riches. Great well being is fundamental to take out day by day obligations when examining well being, numerous individuals would trust the circumstance of their bodies and disregard about the circumstance of their psyches. On the other hand, well being is not just about diminishing and being free from substantial parts of well being. It additionally recommends being sound personality a main priority as well.
Boehm, J. K., Vie, L. L., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2012). The promise of well-being interventions for improving health risk behaviors. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 6(6), 511-519.
In order to understand the Biomedical model of health and wellbeing, the meaning behind the terms biomedical, health and wellbeing must be understood. The term ‘biomedical’ combines both biological and medical science. It is a term used consistently within health care, that helps portray the clear links with the biomedical concepts. ‘Bio’ simply means living, or living organism. ‘Medical’ refers to the diagnosis and cure of a disease with the input of science. Health can be defined as a ‘complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.’ This means that any disturbances that would effect either physical, mental or social well being, will have possible consequences regarding one's health in the
The wellbeing of people has been the main driver to bring changes over time. The term ‘well-being’ refers to both mental and physical statue of human. It basically means the health of individuals.
The journal that I had selected deals with the relationship between health behaviors and happiness. Through the use of cross-sectional survey of 800 randomly selected university students, researchers were able to analyze what it takes for students to remain happy when undergoing many life struggles.
Concepts are terms that talk about phenomena that occurs either in nature or in thoughts. Concept has been described as an abstract term originated from specific attributes and “a symbolic statement describing a phenomenon or a class of phenomena” (McEwen & Wills, 2014, p. 50). Concept analysis expands the knowledge needed in our careers and enriches and widens the continuously changing knowledge in nursing. The term “quality of life” is frequently used in in nursing practice. However, the definition of this term is very ambiguous and interpretations of its meaning often vary. Numerous authors of previous concept analyses of quality of life emphasize the importance of developing a concept of quality of life that is exclusive to nursing and not built on the viewpoints of sociology or other disciplines (Plummer & Molzahn, 2009)
Happiness is not the only indicator of psychological wellbeing. There are some others such as life satisfaction (e.g. Neugarten, Havighurst, &Tobin, 1961; Wood; Wylie, & Sheator, 1969), emotional and mental health , or subjective wellbeing (Kozma, Stones, & McNeil, 1991). These concepts have been used synonymously with psychological wellbeing, however, even though they are related with psychological wellbeing, they are not identical and should not define psychological wellbeing (Stull, 1987).
With more than 500 million Americans diagnosed with Alzheimer's, the quality of their life with the disease is predictable. There are different stages of the disease that range from mild, moderate, and severe. A person with the mild form of the disease could experience finding the right word during conversations difficult, forgetting the names of new acquaintances, and difficulty planning and organizing. A severe form would cause the patient to be confused and unaware of their environment and surroundings. They would need assistance on activities of daily living, have trouble recognizing common faces, struggle to remember personal details, as well as wandering. These severe cases lead to losing the ability to communicate and in the end death. Mrs. F knew the fate of her declining health through this disease. She would progressively become incapable to control her own actions and the disease will eventually lead to death.
(WHO, 1948) describes health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease of infirmity’? There are other dimensions of health such as physical health, mental health and emotional health which can be broken down and looked at individually.
The World Health Organisation defines the state of well-being in which every individual realises his or her own potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to her or his community. The National Wellness Institute of Australia also elaborates that well-being is more than the absence of illness, and is subjective (self-assessed) and objective (ascribed) dimensions.
Psychological well-being that involves the consciousness of self-acceptance, personal growth including openness to new experiences, optimism, hopefulness, purpose in life, control of one’s environment, spirituality, self-direction, and positive relationships.
Conversely there is a substantial and growing body of literature on concepts of well-being including psychological well-being and quality of life. The theories supported by randomized control trials, surveys and previous such writings are compilations of similar groundings of work. That is, similar knowledges are piled on top of another in order to come to greater understanding with increased depth and breadth. However, the assumption that all of the previous research foundation upon with more research is piled is acceptable, or furthering understandings of well-being could be seen as flawed by some critics. Whether or not
Currently, quality of life (QOL) as a measure of individuals’ subjective feelings on various aspects of life and health is regarded as an important concept. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines QOL as ‘an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns’(World Health Organization, 1997). To evaluate the extent of QOL, the WHOQOL Group developed an assessment instrument called WHOQOL-BREF, (WHOQoL Group, 1998; World Health Organization, 1996) a shortened, 26-item instrument.
Even if we use the word “happiness” on daily basis, has anyone ever tried to define it? It’s harder than it seems. When do you feel happy? How is it when you feel happy? Is there any way to understand how much happiness to you experience? This is the main hypothesis of this paper – Can happiness or wellbeing be measured? And if it can be measured, how do we measure it? Happiness is feeling pleasure and enjoyment because of your life, situation (Meriam Webster). Pleasure and enjoyment are very subjective and means different things to different people. This is where the term subjective wellbeing comes from. There are a lot of things that can be included when measuring wellbeing. Various studies have been conducted to assess wellbeing and how does it affect other factors. For example Earlstin(1995) and later on Ferrer-i-Carbonell(2005) have examined the relationship between income and happiness. Gruber(2004) studies the relationship cigarette taxation and happier smokers. Richard, Clark, Gerogellis and Diener(2004) analyze the effect of unemployment on wellbeing.