Quantitative Study On Quantitative Research Study

researchers had conducted and gaining a statistical analysis of the researches, a meta-analysis is often one of the best tools to ensure a positive impact on recidivism “meta-analysis is the principal source of information for "effective principles” (Gendreau, 1996, p. 120). Often times these intervention programs are intensive and behavioral based, which are vital to the program. Behavioral Programs, should target the criminogenic needs of the offender, which has better results when it is paired with the offender’s risk level.

The research topic is selected, the testable research question is developed, research on the topic is found, the literature review is completed, and a decision is made on the research design. Now, one of the most important steps in the research process to accomplish is the collection of data. Notwithstanding the research project and whether the method of research is whether qualitative or quantitative, data must be collected. Data collection is essential whether the method of choice is a mail survey, a telephone survey, an interview, an experiment, field research, or secondary data analysis. Data collection is an important aspect of any research study. Inaccurate data can impact the results of a study and ultimately lead to invalid results. During the data collection step, a significant amount of time, energy and attention are required. In order to ensure the data collection process is valid and successful, one should adhere to the four steps involved: (1) the construction of a collection data form which is used to organize all data that is collected; (2) the designation of the coding strategy used to represent data on a data collection form; (3) the collection of the actual data; and (4) entry into the data collection form (Salkind, 2012).

The statistical analysis on recidivism is constantly expanding. The psychology of criminal conduct (PCC) has a positive and secure promise of an effective program, and is gaining attention for its ability to predict, influence and explain criminal activity. Researchers also deny that the past and future criminal activity can be separated by

Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative methods on each of the elements listed. Please use scholarly, academic literature to support your response.

At intake, all inmates are assessed for mental illness, potential mental health issues, need for treatment, and to identify inmates who are likely to be a danger to themselves or others (Adams & Ferrandino, 2008). The risk assessment process is an important factor in placing inmates within the facility and should be assessed thoroughly by a trained staff member. Monahan (1996) asserts that actuarial models are more accurate than clinical models and should therefore be used to determine who is more likely to be violent and should take the place of clinical approaches. However, Banks, Robbins, Silver, Vesselinov, Steadman, Monahan, and Roth (2004) used a multi-test approach, where several instruments were used to assess offenders rated as high or low risk. The idea is that several instruments are used to assess at an individual level rather than a group level, in turn providing a more accurate probability of risk of offending. The assessment process is an important tool to assess each of the special inmate populations throughout their sentence of incarceration. Each correctional facility within the state of Florida will provide drug and alcohol counseling

There are many various risk prediction scales that are being use to assess offenders. By using these risk assessments on offenders we are able to determine whether the offender is a high, medium, or low risk to the society. The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) is an assessment that consists of a series of questions that are answered by the offender. LSI-R uses all of the following factors “criminal history, education/employment, financial, family, accommodation, leisure, companions, alcohol/drug problems, emotional/personal, and attitudes” (LSI-R, 2015) when assessing an offender. With the score generated from the LSI-R and opinions from correction professional we can determine whether the offender risk of recidivism is high,

In order to collect data a four-part procedure was established. First, a baseline interview were conducted to collect information such as “demographics, socioeconomic status, use of mental health, substance abuse, psychiatric symptomatology, level of substance use and quality of life” (Steadman, Cocozza, & Veysey, 1999). Secondly, a follow up interview consisted of the same information gathering as the baseline interview two months after diversion or booking. The purpose of the interview was to determine if the individual had the initiative of attending initial appointment, the system was able to locate the subject, and elapsed time was enough for significant measures (Steadman, Cocozza, & Veysey, 1999). Third, staff interviews were conducted with trained staff for further data gathering. Lastly, a criminal history form were used to review an individual’s history regarding convictions, arrests, hospitalization and mental health service information. (Steadman, Cocozza, & Veysey, 1999). In comparison to non-diverted persons, diverted individuals exhibited significant difference in paranoid

Quantitative research is used throughout the science field but is also used immensely throughout research in nursing. The author will investigate a study that has been conducted and understand the role of it in the practice of nursing. Quantitative research can be achieved by polls, questionnaires, interviews, or surveys. The primary focus is hand hygiene procedures and how it can reduce the risk of infection among the home and community settings by using handwashing and alcohol based hand sanitizers.

This case study describes Mr. Smith who has to be assessed before his release from prison. Some of his static/historical factors are Mr. Smith’s history of substance abuse. He reports starting to drink on a regular basis at the age of 15, with his heaviest period of drinking being between the ages of 24 - 29. Further he reports using other substances such as marijuana, cocaine, LSD and heroin. Another static factor is Mr. Smith’s age. He now is 65, and his increased age might somewhat lesson his change of reoffending. Mr. Smith also has a history of violence, being especially recorded during his time in school. He would often receive minor sanctions such as detention for his disruptive behaviour in class. He also got into two physical altercations, once breaking a boys jaw and the second time bringing a knife to school in anticipation of the fight. He was expelled from both schools due to these altercations at the age of 14 and 16. After the second time he was expelled he did not return back to school, but obtained

There are three authors for this quantitative research study. Martin Knoll is the HTW of Saarland, Clinical Nursing Research and Evaluation, Saarbruecken, Germany. Christine Lautenschlaeger, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Medical Informatics, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany is the second author. And last, Marianne

“Drugs and Alcohol abuse”, are phrases we hear commonly on the radio, television or in discussions of social problems. People believe it is the user’s personal choice however; it is not only a personal problem that dramatically affects individuals’ life but is a major social problem that affects society as whole. It has become one of the biggest problems in United States today. Alcohol or Drug abuse nearly automatically is linked with criminal acts. The statistical association between alcohol or drug abuse with crime seems to be convincing when examined at the first glance; however, it is not possible to make a conclusion concerning a distinct cause and effect association between the two aspects. Accordingly, this paper will examine

Qualitative and Quantitative study designs both can be beneficial in research design. They both provide valuable options for researchers in the field. These techniques can either be used separately in a research study or they can be combined to achieve maximum information. This paper will define the terms qualitative and quantitative; describe the similarities and differences between each; discuss how qualitative and/or quantitative research designs or techniques could be used in the evaluation of my proposed research; and discuss why linking analysis to study design is important.

The first article, “Criminal Behaviour in users of Psychoactive Substances Who Began Treatment”, is a research that took place in the city of Campinas, São Paolo and describes the relation between aggression in criminal activity and drug use, alcohol consumption. For a more precise conclusion, a new variable was taken into account, the ASPDm (AntiSocial Personality Disorder modified).

There are many different methods of dispersing and accumulating data from subject self-reports, but for the purpose of this research proposal we have elected to adopt a method used in relatively recent study published by the Journal of Drug Issues entitled: “Substance Use, Drug Treatment, and Crime: An Examination of Intra-Individual Variation in a Drug Court Population”.

Quantitative research design is the standard experimental method of most scientific disciplines. These experiments are sometimes referred to as true science, and use traditional mathematical and statistical means to measure results conclusively. They are most commonly used by physical scientists, although social sciences, education and economics have been known to use this type of research. It is the opposite of qualitative research. Quantitative experiments all use a standard format, with a few minor inter-disciplinary differences, of generating a hypothesis to be proved or disproved. This hypothesis must be provable by mathematical and statistical means, and is the basis around which the whole experiment is designed. Randomization of any study groups is essential, and a control group should be included, wherever possible. A sound quantitative design should only manipulate one variable at a time, or statistical analysis becomes cumbersome and open to question. Ideally, the research should be constructed in a manner that allows others to repeat the experiment and obtain similar results.