Queer theory looks at the kinds of social structures and social constructs which define our ideas about sexuality as an act and sexuality as identity. As an academic field, queer theory examines how notions of hetero/homosexuality have historically being defined and how various cultures as well as periods have enforced ideas about what kinds of sexuality are normal and immoral.
Tony E. Adams defines queer as, “actions that rebel against—heterosexual—heteronormative—expectations of intimate relationships including biases against being single, aspirations for marriage, norms about
Much of queer theory developed out of a response to the AIDS crisis, which promoted a renewal of radical activism, and the growing homophobia brought about by public responses to AIDS. The consistent belief that AIDS is a gay disease has long been
Through the intersectionality theory and social learning theory, one can see how and why the generalizations of Muslims and homosexuals have impact my life and how they are perpetuated in today’s society. Being a black, Muslim, lesbian woman in this country represent one of the minorities that is being affected by the negative stereotypes. These stereotypes are observed behavior that is being adopted by many places or individuals, who believes they know the perceptions of those other individuals that are different from
even though sexuality can be considered universal, the sexual behaviors affiliated with it offer different attitudes in various communities. Sexuality is aligned to sexual attraction where individuals can identify themselves with a broad range of sexuality that is bisexual, gay or being lesbian. Sexuality can change over time in a person depending on the circumstances surrounding him or her. It may be affected by the social circle and emotional imbalances that may occur in an individual. Interestingly there exists sexual inequality among many societies in the world. As observed, many societies encourage men to have multiple sex partners but forbid it in women. Moreover, pre-marital sex is promoted in men, but women are flaunted if they participate in pre-marital sex. Across the globe, Western Europe has embraced certain norms in sexuality such as homosexuality whereas African society embraces a negative attitude towards the same.
In contemporary Western culture, choices about romantic love and sexuality are a critical aspect of individual self-definition. Whether someone is homosexual or heterosexual is thus also considered to be a crucial aspect of who he or she is as a human being. In previous eras, where individuals were married young, and entered into arranged marriages, this was not the case. Although people had same-sex desire, this desire was enjoyed outside of marriage. What was important for heterosexuals and homosexuals were the social obligations of partnership, children, and marriage, versus personal fulfillment in a romantic fashion.
The erotic has been a source of major discussion within queer and feminist theories. Indeed, much of the discussions surrounding homosexuality or queerness in general focus on ideas of sexuality and the erotic. It has been recognized as of late as a major force in people’s lives, something that permeates nearly every aspect of their lives. However, with the rise of discussions surrounding the erotic, the concept of the nonerotic has been left by the wayside, so to speak. There are many discussions surrounding the erotic that give no space for those who may not identify with the erotic in any way. This is seen in a variety of theories concerning the erotic. This work will identify some groups which may not embrace or experience the
Queer Theory houses the analytical tools used to examine what is “normal” and “abnormal,” primarily through deconstructing issues of sexuality in society. Its value comes from the fact that is more than just researching homosexual lives; it is research/theorizing why/how/when lives are homosexualized, “queered” outside of the norm.2
Great job of demonstrating critical thinking and seeing the anthropological and queer theories on a macro level. Your discussion post showed the gender theories as a part of a large-scale phenomenon as it relates to the development of society. You placed gender within a broader historical and sociocultural context and revealed how global forces combined to shape both male and female gender role. These held especially true for your explanation of queer theory. In contrast, my perception of queer theory was more or less based on the understanding that it was a movement and not biosocial approach, focusing on the rights as it relate to sexuality. Queer theorists are striving for deconstruction of sexuality in their mind labels such as lesbian,
Teresa de Lauretis coined 'queer theory ' in 1991 (Bell). Queer theory is a set of ideas based around the idea that identities are not fixed and do not determine who we are. It suggests that it is meaningless to talk in general about any group, as identities consist of so many elements that to assume that people can be seen collectively on the basis of one shared characteristic is wrong. Indeed, it proposes that we deliberately challenge all notions of fixed identity, in varied and non-predictable ways. Queer theory finds fixed and stable identity-categories as problems that need solutions, including sex, gender, and sexual orientation categories. One of queer theory’s goals is to break down the use of categories and labels that stereotype and marginalize gender and/or sexual minorities, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender (LGBT) people. Another of queer theory’s goals is to introduce a more fluid perspective of gender and sexuality to help guide the understanding of human diversity (Gedro and Mizzi). Foucault shows us that fixed and
Queer theory is based on the idea that heterosexuality is the norm, when in reality it is just what some people believe is normal. It suggests that an individual 's identity does not determine who the individual is as a human being. Some people in society feel that being a non-
Valocchi’s article, NOT YET QUEER ENOUGH The Lessons of Queer Theory for the Sociology of Gender and Sexuality, discusses the advances queer theory has made towards becoming a Sociological Theory. Sociologists that study gender and sexuality are trying to cover all aspects when considering queer theory. Social structures need to be taken into consideration when dealing with sexuallity as well as gender ientities. To fully understand queer theory we need to understand how all the concepts regarding ones sexuality, the gender they choose to identify as, and sex in regards to their biology relate. Sex is the biological classificaition of being male or female while gender is the social construction of who you are and what you have to do because
In general, I think of myself as a very open-minded person and I do not really experience difficulty discussing a wide variety of topics with different people. I am generally able to separate my personal feelings about an issue from other people's personal feelings about issues, so that I do not feel threatened when my opinion differs from theirs. I accept that human beings are different and that it is inevitable that I am going to have different beliefs than some people, and that those different beliefs do not make me better or worse than other people, but simply make me different from them. Therefore, I do consider myself a pretty open-minded person.
In the past decades, the word “queer” traversed many definitions, from a pejorative for gay to a self-affirming umbrella term. While the word “queer” is primarily associated with “non-normative” tendencies (Love 172), the word “uncanny…applies to everything that was intended to remain secret, hidden away, and has come into the open” (Freud 132). Upon closer inspection of the words, queer and uncanny, and Andrew Davenport’s popular children’s television show Teletubbies, we see that the Teletubbies are the exemplary, digital manifestations of “queer, uncanny doppelgängers” (Cole).
Homosexuality is genetic! How can this statement be true? It is indeed true in the precise fact that Romans 3:23 points out, “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” Humanity has been cursed with being genetically embedded with sin and a sinful nature. The current worldview is that homosexuality and multiple sexual orientations come from nature, and not nurture. This viewpoint is correct in that it is human nature to sin and seek out one’s own selfish desire. However, No one is prescribing a remedy for this sin. “Become sober-minded as you ought, and stop sinning; for some have no knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame.” (1 Corinthians 15:34) What the world has done is celebrated this sin and deceive youth through their much-wanted desire for acceptance and identity. There is a copious amount of research out there, along with world definitions of each orientation, and a call for acceptance of others’ orientations. There is also the other side of the argument and the fundamental truths that come from the word of God. Various resources are available to help youth leaders, teachers, parents and pastors to have a higher understanding of this cultural issue and the solutions and treatments available for youth struggling in this area. Spiritual leaders in the home, church, and schools ought to be prepared to teach on these topics readily, since this world, in which many youth are daily immersed, will readily present its own point of view with utter
Before getting into the abundance of slang and its significance on English, it is first best to cover the four base words of the LGBTQ community and how they have transgressed over time. Queer, lesbian, homosexual, and gay all share an importance to the beginnings of the more modern usages. The origin of queer is unclear, but the Oxford English dictionary defines one of its earliest meanings around 1513 as ‘strange, odd, peculiar, eccentric’. It wasn’t until the 1900s that it was used as an offensive term for homosexual people, with its original meaning still in context. This changed in the 1990s when early conversations about queer theory were had by social theorists Michel Foucault, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Judith Butler, and others. This brought the word into a new light. Of course it still holds some of its derogatory meaning, but by using this word to define a theory that discussed the idea that gender is major part of the necessary self and in gay/lesbian studies it closely examines the socially constructed nature of identities and sexual acts. This reading connects directly with what is happening at present, which is a reclaiming of queer by people in the LGBTQ community to stand for both questioning and sexual and gender minorities. In her article on equality, Lisa Duggan states, “Queer people, particularly queer people of color, began to reclaim queer in response to a perceived shift in the gay community toward liberal conservatism, catalyzed by Andrew Sullivan 's