Question 1 Control Response: A Qualitative Analysis

Patients are asked to rate their symptom for each question for a period of two weeks. The patient is the one who rates himself, therefore, this instrument’s results are subjective. The sum total is the calculated, and interpreted to

Forty items were generated for each test. These were then input into the online survey software, Qualtrics, and the answers were coded. For the knowledge portion, AZA Knowledge Quiz, participants were told to rate statements as either true or false. For the self-report portion, participants were told to rate

This questionnaire will utilize close-ended questions for several reasons. The close-ended questions enable pre-set answers which allows for greater ease of coding and analyzation of answers while simultaneously taking away any opportunity for unnecessary or undesired answers to questions. It also adds to higher incidences of participation in the study because the respondent will not have to take vast amounts of time to respond to short-answer questions which can be daunting for those who have difficulty reading or writing which is important in regards to seniors who may have difficulty reading due to poor eyesight or may have problems holding a pen or pencil due to arthritis.

The 13 hypotheses listed in the Literature Review section were statistically tested. Each hypothesis is again listed below along with the

The design included a number of survey questions with varying number of choices. Most of the questions required the surveyed person to decide on scales of 1-3 or 1-4. This will allow those taking the survey to find where they fit, but will not determine if certain parameters are a little above the middle or greatly above the middle like question 4a which states has increased or has decreased – we wont know by how much or how impressive it might be.

The instrumentation that is to be used is called the Your First College Year (YFCY) survey. This instrument is geared toward freshman college students, and it is a survey that concentrates on student experiences while in college with different areas in their college life. The questionnaire also recaps items from the freshman survey so that any changes can be studied. This particular survey is known to be beneficial for retention studies. This instrument contains 41 questions, and the survey will be administered on the computer instead of using the paper form. The rating scales that are used consists of, but not limited to, questions with ‘yes/no’ answers, ratings such with choices from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’, and questions that will have rating choices that range from ‘can’t rate/no experience’ to very satisfied’. It will

The results of main affects for assigned clients in the control group: gender (F(1,1.935) = 0.015, p = .907, η2 = .051), age

Overall, I was not surprised that my scores varied depending upon the specific category. I grew up in a household that mainly revolved around school and physically activities including sports so I was expecting to score higher on these two categories. This survey accurately represents what aspects of health that I focus on the most. I was surprised to see that my social health was the highest category because I am usually a quiet person but I have tried to talk more with people since coming to college. My family was never very spiritual or religious so I was expecting my spiritual health score to be lower than all the other categories. This survey is an accurate representation of my overall wellness because the scores matched my expectations.

The instrument measured physical and mental health dimensions through eleven questions and thirty-six items covering eight components that were represented by functional capacity, physical pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional aspects, mental health, and a related question about the current general health a year before the interview (Girardi et al., 2015).

Questions 1-5 in our questionnaire were added to create a total health orientation score. Based on a median split of the total score the class was divided into high and low orientation groups. 12 participants were in the high health group and 13 were in the low health group. To measure how health oriented was the entire class we used a 5-35 scale where; 5 = not at all, 20 = moderately, 35 = definitely. Therefore, the lowest score a person can receive was 5 and the highest score a person can receive was 35. The entire class (M=20.36, SD=4.932) reported being moderately in terms of how health orientated were they.

This is a patient questionnaire that uses a score of 0-4 to assess subjective neuropathic symptoms (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, 2007).

(b)STI Risk Scale. I have very low risk of receiving an STI from a potential partner. I am a cautious person in general, especially when it comes to my health. The only thing I noted as a 4 were the two statements asking about comfortability discussing sex and STIs with doctors or health professionals and sexual partner. I honestly do not know how I would feel talking about those issues because I have never had to, but I could imagine it being awkward for me.

The five survey question could be used by a hospital or outpatient facility to determine whether or not a discussion withing the organization or clinic should be considered.

4. What measurement scales would you have used on the survey that was part of the in-restaurant product tests?

Is used to determine the percentage of the respondents based on their answers. The frequency also presented the actual response of the respondents to a specific question or item in the questionnaire. The formula used was: