1.3.2 Debating skills
As a result of the activities and assessments in the program, the students learns how to pursue their arguments. The skill to argue about the point of view helps them in becoming a good advocate of healthcare quality, risk, and safety. For example, this skill provides the students with ability to present their view to a CEO of an organization during a 5 minute encounter in an elevator (p3:52).
The students learn how to solve a complicated problem through the “research and creative thinking skills and through ability to chunk an argument in a new way” but also forced the students to “think and understand both sides of an issue” (p6:3). The students learn to write a solution by arguing on the opposing ideologies of the issue. The skill student learns as a result of the debate is way to “challenge thinking of the superior management” and direct the decision which is better for the patient (p3:67, p6:5).
Some instructors make them “fight on an argument” and pull the students out of their comfort zones, so the students can learn to manage a tense situation. After the sessions of the debates and argumentation the “students feel happy and they love (the debate session)” (p6:16). Other participant described that the debates is equally liked by him/her and the students. He/ She randomly distributed students into the groups ‘for” and ‘against’ a given topic and then moderate the debate. At the end of the debate, the winners were chosen by the students. The
However, critical thinking skills must being in nursing school. Institutions must help facilitate higher level of thinking to help evolve critical thinking skills in order to have the best outcomes for their patients. Better outcomes equal higher payouts for the business, so it is in everyone’s best interest to educate their staff and continue to strive for success.
This meaning that schools are still missing the chance to tap into the intellectual skills that students possess. An even deeper meaning to this would be the overall fact that students come already equipped with these argumentative intellectual skills. Graff even shows that he agrees with another author named Meier, who believes students should “fight with ideas” instead of “fighting with fists”. This being another point that Graff makes that I would agree with. This being because I use argumentative skills constantly within my own life. Within my family, we often discuss various topics which causes arguments very easily. An example that comes to mind when using these skills would be discussing political viewpoints with my grandma. Both of us would on occasion, sit down and argue about our own points bases off the knowledge that we possess on the specific topic. Usually most arguments resulted in one of us with the beginning argument and the other presenting a counterargument. Within my personal beliefs, I feel as if students often use these skills which is why I agree with Graff.
The pillow method is a five-step process used to resolve a disagreement or enable two people to gain understanding from a disagreement. The process involves each individual to look at the problem through five different perspectives. These steps or perspectives include: “I’m right you’re wrong”, “You’re right I’m wrong”, “both right both wrong”, “this issue isn’t important”, and “the truth is in all perspectives” (Alder & Proctor, p. 104). The purpose of the pillow method is for each person to gain insight from each step in the process. By looking at the problem from multiple perspectives each person gets the chance to enhance their cognitive complexity (Alder & Proctor, p. 104). In this paper I
Throughout high school, I harbored a deep admiration for debate and dreamed of joining the team. Its quintessence of ideals in rational argument, tolerance for conflicting points of view, and rigorous self-examination appealed strongly to me. Yet simple things, like pronouncing a word wrong or having an accent, were enough to hold me back. Thus, I passed through my high school years unnoticed.
Select the most appropriate format to persuade your intended audience of the resolution to your issue. Possible formats include a political campaign, a city council proposal, an editorial article, a commercial, a radio-style podcast, a comprehensive political pamphlet, an interactive game, a website, and so forth.
Tanner (2006), had introduce the term ‘thinking like a nurse’. When I read this article I was wondering what it means and takes to think like a nurse, I am a nurse by profession and yet I don’t even know what it means. In order to be a professional nurse, nurses are required to learn to think like a nurse. To my surprise, to be able think like a nurse, a nurse got to clearly defined and understands what is critical thinking and clinical reasoning. Both terms are powerful terms and these terms explain the mental processes nurses use to make certain that they are doing their most excellent thinking and decision making for their patient’s better outcomes.
In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.
Reason abstractly and quantitatively- It’s important that students are able to pause during solving the problem and continue to analyze, reflect and strategize for the solution as needed.
State main argument #1: Kids should have recess for at least 20 mins a day
H10: A student analyses and synthesises information and ideas into sustained and logical argument for a range of purposes, audiences and contexts.
In the film The Great Debaters, the true story of a college debate team in Texas highlights the importance of public speaking. In numerous instances, if a topic makes a large group uncomfortable this topic goes untouched. However, in this film, the debate team bravely brings on those topics that are close to their hearts, even though society does not want to talk about these issues. The most prominent example of uneasy topics is when James Farmer Jr., in the middle of a Harvard debate, with a predominantly white audience, goes to talk about the lynching of people of color. While this was a topic purposely not brought up due to making people uncomfortable, by Farmer doing this it started the discussion. Obviously, one man saying lynching is inhumane does not solve the problem. However, one voice can start a discussion. Discussions lead to
Creating debates in the classroom incorporates critical thinking skills by providing opportunities to orally speak and verbalize one’s thoughts and opinions. According to Scott (2008), using debates as a learning tool, increases critical thinking skills as it requires students to research their information, draft their argument, gather and analyze information, and justify their answer as they present their side of the argument (Scott, 2008). It also allows students to evaluate information they receive that might be of a different perspective than their own and come to their own conclusions. For example, students can read an article about a current event and vote on which side they believe in and then create an argument, reasoning, and conclusion around their
In my first tournament, out of 100 debaters, I placed 4th. With two weeks of preparation, I managed to powerfully and persuasively relay my viewpoints while eclipsing three-fourths of my competition. I realized that not only did I enjoy debating, but I found my niche.
There were two questions developed for the purpose of this research. According to Mann (2012), the two questions were as following: (1) How do nursing students use critical thinking skills and clinical judgment to resolve a healthcare dilemma? (2) Does grand rounds as an educational strategy promote development of critical thinking and clinical judgment in nursing students?
1. Think of your past experience with reading and fictional analysis - what do you love about reading and debating a good story - what don 't you like - how do you think this class will hone your reading and thinking skills.