Questions On Common Core Math

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) was first implemented in 2010, nine years after I graduated from high school. Although I wasn’t personally affected by the new academic standards, it has a direct impact on the current and future generation of leaders, innovators, and world changers including my future children. The initial purpose of the Common Core Standards is to set high-quality learning goals designed to prepare students to be college and career ready. Given the current controversies surrounding CCSS, studies have shown that although the intent was to benefit students in the long-run it may actually be hindering their mathematical and reading skills. To further explore the arguments behind the Common Core initiative, I will

The Common Core has been developed as a nationwide measurement for student progress. Officially launched in 2009 as a federal funding bill, the standards identify skills that every student residing in the United States should master in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics from kindergarten through 12th grade (Gewertz, 2015). The Common Core itself is not a curriculum, however, it identifies rigorous objectives that must be met by a school’s curriculum. The purpose is to initiate a deeper focus on developmental learning by using interdisciplinary instruction. This redefines the way that students learn because their progress is no longer assessed on the outcome of their performance, but by the process that has allowed them to reach the

Imagine being given a math problem, such as, 7+7. Most people would do simple mental math to get the answer fourteen. But in American education millions of kids are forced to solve these problems with a concept called “number bonds,” and being restricted to one way of solving is greatly reducing creativity in American kids. Not only has this change in education caused stress in children of all ages but also in their parents who greatly struggle with helping their children on their homework because they don’t understand the new concepts.

Even though the idea of having a common set of standards is appealing to the public, and Common Core still has the support of the public majority, the intentions of the policy need to be made clearer. Public versus educator perspectives on teacher's role in education is different (Henderson

Common Core is built as an infective for education to all schools, but what it is, is a policy that all students learn the same. Common Core has been adopted in forty-three states around the nation. Common Core is designed to get students ready for college and career ready from grades Kindergarten through twelfth grade. “The basic definition of what Common Core is, a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy.” (Board)“The college- and career-readiness standards were developed first and then incoporated into the K-12 standards in the final cersion of the Common Core we have today.” (Practices) The construction of Common Core was by seeing which state standards were already the best, using experienced teachers, leading-thinkers, content experts, and also public feedback about their child’s education. Common Core is currently being endorsed by the White House. “Common Core is currently costing the United States eighty billion dollars.” (Board) Common Core was created by state educational chiefs and governors from forty-eight states. Common Core states that it will get students ready for their futures, but has only hurt them by not truly completing the goals set. Common Core is developmentally inappropriate for students because the cost of Common Core, it is pushed by the government for competition between states, and the strong implantation of standardized testing.

The lack of educational benchmarks and standardization in the United States of America, USA is disjointed and subpar leaving students ill prepared to enter the workforce and college. As evidenced by the persistent problem of students graduating and passing required exit exams in high school; yet, they still needed remediation upon entry to college. The Common Core is good because it provides a set of age appropriate learning goals and sets a national high-quality academic standard for Math and English to prepare students for college and career readiness. In essence, the Common Core defines what a student should know and be able to do at different grade levels.

The new Common Core State Standards for Mathematics bring a new opportunity to the classrooms of the United States that many people view as a controversial. According to the NCTM (2013) “The Common Core State Standards offer a foundation for the development of more rigorous, focused, and coherent mathematics curricula, instruction, and assessments that promote conceptual understanding and reasoning as well as skill fluency” (par. 1). While some people believe that the Common Core State Standards may hinder progress in the classroom for many reasons including too much government control, teaching to the test, an excessive focus on language arts and math, and wasted resources, others agree with the NCTM statement about that claims the standards help increase conceptual understanding, reasoning, and skill fluency.

Common Core State Standards is being heard throughout the education world. Many cringe when the words are spoken and many fight to support what the words stand for. Common Core was introduced in 2009 by state leaders. Common Core State Standards were developed to prepare children for the business world or the reality after grade school. “The Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy, also known as ELA” (About the Standards, n.d.). The goals for the standards outline what students should know before leaving his or her current grade level. “The standards were created to ensure that all students graduate from high school with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in college, career, and life, regardless of where they live” (About the Standards, n.d.). This is an ambitious goal, but with much support can be accomplished. According to Common Core State Standards Initiative (n.d.) The Common Core has been adopted by forty-two states already and is accompanied by District of Columbia and Department of Defense Education Activity. Common Core was developed to improve the academics in society’s schools. Academics in the past years have not been successful and the United States has fallen behind international education. “One root cause has been an uneven patchwork of academic standards that vary from state to state and do not agree on what students should know and be able to do at each

At New Bern High School, Charlie Bernthal, a freshman, sits in a class room instructed by Common Core standards. It will take one of Charlie’s teachers six minutes to demonstrate the various methods to complete a simple multiplication problem, such as 63 x 24. Students are taught to use arrays, lattice, partial product methods, and eventually the traditional U.S. customary method. The Common Core standards happen to be a big discussion point during this year’s election. People have many strong opinions when it comes to the Common Core State Standards, but researchers and institutions express reasons why teachers and schools should not use Common Core to instruct America’s youth. Schools and teachers should not teach by Common Core standards because these standards are detrimental to our children.

In the past few years, educators everywhere have been hearing and forming opinions about the phenomenon known as Common Core. For my research paper I will be writing about this phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is simply to inform about different aspects and characteristics of Common Core. I will discuss the following points: what Common Core is, where and how Common Core is being applied, changes from the former system, how Common Core affects teachers, cost of applying Common Core, changes in the subjects of mathematics and English language arts/literacy, what research has been conducted on Common Core and arguments for and against Common Core. Common Core has become an extremely important part

In the article, “Six Ways the Common Core Is Good For Students”, news company, Nea Today, reports that the new Common Core standards may present a new hope for teachers and educators in the classroom. Some of these ideas include restoring creativity in the classroom, increasing collaboration, and providing an equal platform for students to feel comfortable in their learning environment. The article provides multiple ways that Common Core could help improve the public education system.

The percentage of students in third grade through eighth grade in New York with proficient scores in English before the Common Core was 31.3, now after the adoption of Common Core, the percentage of students is 31.4 (Educational Standards and Curriculum). Although the percentage of proficient scores achieved by students increased, it did not increase significantly, which was a goal of the standards.Individuals like teachers, state officials, educators and students all have split opinions on the Common Core curriculum. There are many positives of the Common Core’s education system that supporters think are important to a good education, yet the negative aspects of the curriculum explained by individuals with opposing opinions overrule the positive ones. The negative aspects of the Common Core initiative outweigh any positive ones. The Common Core should be abolished.

Common Core is a controversial topic, whose reach includes everywhere from the political arena to family dinner tables across America. There is a major dispute on whether Common Core is breaking or making education and whether parents should be allowing their children to opt out of testing. In 2009 state leaders, including governors and state commissioners of education, launched and developed the Common Core State Standards. Currently, 42 states including the District of Colombia have adopted the Common Core State Standards. Alaska, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana and Virginia are the seven states that have not adopted Common Core (Boslaugh, 2015, para.2). Sarah Boslaugh is the author of the article “Common Core State Standards

Erik Erickson, a parent to a second-grader, originally supported common core, stating that: “In a society as mobile as ours, kids moving from one state to another should not be so far behind or ahead students in their new state. A common set of skills at each grade across the nation makes sense (“Why Parents Like Me are Angry about Common Core”).” However, once he saw his own child struggling to keep up with the “convoluted” mathematic lessons, he had to reexamine his own opinions on the matter. Erickson and his wife (both proficient mathematicians), struggled to help their second grader with her math homework; and they weren’t the only ones. Erickson received calls from many parents expressing how they too had difficulty helping their children with their schoolwork; one mother described how her child’s school offered to give her lessons on the material so she could help her child (“Why Parents Like Me are Angry about Common Core”). This is the crux of

Since schools have implemented the Common Core standards, many parents find themselves increasingly confused by the coursework their children bring home, feeling incapable of providing homework help. Because the methods kids are now learning in school are dramatically different than those you might have been taught, the changes may seem arbitrary and unnecessary. However, as the expert math tutors at Mathnasium of La Cañada explain, the new standards are intended to engender a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts and why they work.