Questions On Ethical And Ethical Theories

I would begin by saying my discussions will be centered on two intriguing theories I have learnt through this course deontology ethical theory and Virtue ethical theory. To my understanding, deontology theory takes on the face of a normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based totally on regulations, rules and laws. The theory is far on occasion described as "responsibility-" or "duty-" or "rule-" based totally ethics, due to the fact that it emphasizes on guidelines "binding people to their responsibility". For instance deontology states that an act that is not appropriate morally can cause something top, such as capturing the intruder but killing is inaccurate even if it’s in defense of your own family for

In this essay I have chosen to compare two opposing theories, Immanuel Kant 's absolutist deontological ethics and Joseph Fletchers relativist situation ethics. The deontological ethics focuses on actions made according to duty and the categorical imperative - which shows how acts are intrinsically good or bad. The situation ethics state that no act is intrinsically good or bad, and that actions should b made according to love. From this perspective it looks as thought Kant 's views were less personal than Fletcher 's, although in actuality both focus on the best outcome for humans.

Ethics derives from the Greek word ethos which means character. Essentially ethics is a theory of proper moral conduct. Essentially, in ethics one is trying to make a distinction between what is the case between what ought to be the case. A key player in ethics is the moral agent. A moral agent is a person that has an ability to reflect on moral issues. Moral actions conform to the law and immoral actions do not conform to the law.

It was founded by Jeremy Bentham, later developed by James Mill and perfected by his son John Stuart Mill (Rachels 13). It is called the principle of utility. It is a democratic principle of

The life of prisoners some may never know. There are those who care not to know what goes on behind that wired fence. We find that some people that are convicted of crimes that they did not commit. Some people would rather turn their heads to what actually happens in a prison institution, because they feel it is no concern of theirs. Innocent women and men face a disaster in life when they find their selves incarcerated in such facility as these. The treatment in prison facilities toward prisoners with health issues or those who develop health concerns that

In Intro to Ethics, we have discussed each moral theory in the context of how the theories dealt with the theory of right conduct and with the deontic status the action had. When we looked at how each theory we talked about dealt with deontic status, we looked at how the actions were right or wrong. The main theories we looked at this semester that dealt with right conduct were utilitarianism, Kant’s moral theory, and virtue ethics. Although each of these moral theories has its own flaws, I believe that Kant’s moral theory is the strongest and most superior out of all the moral theories.

When a person decides to take action in an event, an ethical standard is most likely in his or her core. Different theories can be examined to study ethics and how they play into a person’s life. No matter what theory is at play, a person’s worldview will always impact his or her ethical standards. For example, an atheist may have a different view on homelessness than a Christian. The atheist and Christian will take different actions, when confronted, because of these worldviews. The study of why we have ethics is called metaethics. Metaethics describes ethics itself to have a deeper understanding of ethics. Several ethical theories exist that our worlview impacts, one theory, metaethics, examines ethics itself which leads to certain

“Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company and part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design repairs for their repair” (Bartlett). Brad is considering replacing a broken brake cable with a more durable material, even though the customer did not request it in their order and specifically requested that “No aesthetic changes be made to the bike” (Bartlett). Brad’s manager suggests that his considered actions would go against the company’s policy of “The customer is always right.” Should Brad disobey the manager and the customer to possibly lose his job or go along with

Deontological ethical, according to deontologists certain actions are right or wrong in themselves and so there are absolute ethical standards that must be supported. The problems with this position are concerned with how we know which acts are wrong and how we distinguish between a wrong act and an omission. Philosophers such as Nagel argue that there is a fundamental concept of right which makes our actions, while this might be dominated in certain circumstances. There may be an absolute

However, there exists instances or situations where it becomes contradicting for an individual to chose between acting out of one’s sense of duty and avoiding the impact of acting out on the same. In an ethical perspective, the choice can either be termed as either right

When asked to describe any conflicting ethical theories. With the patient being physically restrained in the middle of the hall by the nurse station by two of the nursing aides that were on duty, and being told, in a very agitated tone to calm down and not to get up. I feel that, this would ben conflicting with the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics with provision 1.1 which states that “ a fundamental principle that underlies all nursing practice is respect for the inherent dignity, worth, unique attributes and human rights of all individuals” (American Nurses Association Code of Ethics, 2015, p.1 para1).

After looking at the definition of the ethical type of Consequentialism, I would like to give a short example in my own words what I understand Consequentialism is. Consequentialism is the ethical reasoning that would apply to a situation where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or what is less evil or bad in any particular situation ? You would make that choice based on the ethical type Consequentialism. So in my life I believe that I have had to make ethical decisions based on this ethical type. Whether it be at work at home with the family or with friends.

Have you ever felt that you should do something but never knew why? Duty Ethics are something that are said to be somewhat natural or born through an individual through a rigorous learning process called life. Duty Ethics can be applied in almost any circumstance and in multiple ways. Learning Duty Ethics can help an individual to gain more ground and save face when needed, and on top of all these great perks- your putting others first.

Philosophical Ethical Theories As we know, philosophers divide ethical theories into three major classes. They are Metaethics(descriptive), Conceptual(applied), and Normative(prescriptive). Metaethics basically takes the scientific approach to concocting where exactly our ethical principals and philosophies come from (Feiser, 2005).

1. Explain in detail the decisive question of ethical theory and the classical and modern answers to this question.