Questions On Intellectual Property Rights

- There were large cost amounts that the Department of National Revenue dealt with that Microsoft was supposed to be charged with.

As part of the "Final Judgement", Microsoft was prohibited from entering into agreements allowing them to fine OEM's for using

The government has been looking into Microsoft since 1990, when the Federal Trade Commission first started examining charges of monopolistic behavior. In 1995, Microsoft and the U.S. Justice Department reached a settlement that required the company to change a variety of business practices, including key aspects of its licensing agreements with personal computer makers (2).

Wang Huoqing subjected himself to our laws by operating an interactive internet website where he sold counterfeit products. On the website he created contact with buyers in California and made a sales which provided sufficient evidence to try Huoging in court. However the internet is a vague place where anything can be claimed true. If any information of his location was displayed on

The three indicted were allegedly part of a ring that trafficked drugs throughout the country, starting in Texas and ending up in New York City and Lawrence, Massachusetts.

Commencing in 1990, Microsoft was investigated and then charged with violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act which governs United States businesses. The company was determined to be a monopoly, and one which used anti-competitive practices to keep its leading edge on the market. As would most any organization on the receiving end of the allegations, Microsoft did not agree with the charges and sought to defend its business

Corporations that move into China have long recognized that internet censorship is a fact of life. In 2006,

It is interesting to note that some of the new Internet regulations contradict International Laws signed by the Chinese government. China signed the

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 has changed the focus of copyright enforcement away from the act of copyright infringement and toward the act of circumvention of the technologies used to protect the rights of digital media owners. Additionally, the act has had adverse effects that outweigh the benefits that it provides.

Description of cultural attitudes towards and presumption about whether a person can own words and knowledge. Indicate if modern trends such as globalization and easy access to information affected these and give consideration as to whether are also applicable in an organization. Also indicate if the presumptions hold true in ones career as an employee of the organization and how may this essay be relevant to ones work.

Nonetheless, Foxconn can evade human rights because the Chinese government turns a blind eye to the allegations. The United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights prohibits this working environment, but China failed to sign the agreement (source). Moreover, Foxconn is their largest manufacturer and contributor to their gross domestic product (GDP) with $118 billion in 2013 (source). Thus, the government supports the company with additional workers and zero fines/penalties. However, U.S.-based and other corporations lack initiative to change the Foxconn culture. These companies

The depth of China’s involvement in intellectual property theft is far greater than I would have ever expected. Prior to taking the business law course, I never thought about what intellectual property theft was or the impacts that it has. The report of the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, states that “China is the world’s largest source of Intellectual Property theft” (pg 10 & 11) costing the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year, along with millions of jobs.

A piece of computer software comprises a program, which is a series of instructions expressed in code, intended to cause a particular result when used in computer hardware. Computer software is afforded copyright protection as a category of literary work and enjoy copyright protection under sections 1(1) and 3(1) (b) Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 [1]. In order to be an original literary work, the computer program must be the product of a substantial degree of skill, labour and judgement by the author. This was decided in the case of University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd [2].

The first question to arise would be what kind of laws does China already have in place? Also, one has to consider the way the laws are enforced if any standard has been set. There are two standard laws that handle this type of incidence in the country. The first one is the Anti-Unfair competition law AUCL (Rogers, 2014). The punishment that is set forth will be determined by the severity of the crime.

An Example: Why U.S Internet giants like E-bay, Amazon, Google and Yahoo failed badly in China