Questions On International Trade Liberalisation

The module content provided by Colorado State University-Global Campus discusses regional trading agreements. It states that the tendency to use negotiation and organization of free trade had been undermined by regional trading agreements since the 1980s. Furthermore, CSU-Global argues that regional trade groups strengthen trade and the benefits of the groups involved. On the other hand, it undermines free trade by discouraging trade with members not part of the group.

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for 21 Pacific Rim economies. APEC members are described as ‘economies’ because the APEC cooperative process is predominantly concerned with trade and economic issues, with members engaging with one another as economic entities. APEC promotes free trade throughout the Asia-Pacific region. It was established in 1989 in response to the growing interdependence of Asia-Pacific economies and the advent of regional trade blocs in other parts of the world; to fears that highly industrialised Japan (a member of G8) would come to dominate economic activity in the Asia-Pacific region; and to establish new markets for agricultural products and raw materials beyond Europe.(Andrew Elek)

A Globalized Economy opens frontiers and generates free competition, sometimes uneven, between markets. Usually, China, USA, Germany and UK among others lead this global trade nevertheless, increasing productivity, infrastructure and government policies become the key to strengthen and survive in an open market. Free trade treaties or agreements between nations is an opportunity that countries seek to open borders and

Trade between the US and the EU leaves a ripple effect, not only through their own economies, but throughout the world economy, given that these are two of the world’s wealthiest nations. “The transatlantic economy is the largest and wealthiest market in the world, accounting for over 50 percent of world GDP in terms of value and over 40 percent in terms of purchasing power.” Years of trade between these two giants has demonstrated the mutual benefits of trade and has set the standard for both developed and developing countries. Their example shows the interdependence that different countries uphold and the efficiency that would result if all embraced this inter twine rather than fought to independently produce their own goods, encouraging

Indeed, it has established the normative legal framework for multilateral trade in the four corners of the globe. As Matsushita notes ‘The WTO is the first international organization to bring about the rule of law in international trade in large scale backed up by the effective dispute settlement mechanism’. The over 300 hundred decision by the dispute settlement mechanism on various cases establishes an important corpus of legal precedent that serves as a frame of reference for the negotiation of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. As a result, the fundamental principles underlying the WTO agreements, such as the MFN and National Treatment (NT) are here to stay and will continue to influence all future trade agreements. Hence, it can be agreed that the WTO has instituted the value system of free trade worldwide, such that the majority of the globe believes in trade liberalization and is willing to open up their economies to participate in free trade. Moreover, by creating a common trade language that almost every country understands, it has only made trading that much easier to negotiate. The existing agreements also provide a solid foundation for countries to build upon when drafting their own trade agreements, whether it is for free trade or preferential

The end of World War II implied a new era of Global Business; the era of open borders, globalization and therefore free trade. In the 21st century, a flourishing world economy can no longer be imagined with existing trade barriers and high quotas, advocators argue. The world economic system and our wellbeing, are highly dependent on both economic growth and globalization, which in turn are reliant on “the absence of artificial barriers to the free flow of goods and services between countries” (Dunkley 2004, p. 9). Nations ensure this mutually beneficial situation by signing preferential trade arrangements with each other. Arguably, the most common form of such arrangements are Free Trade Agreements (FTAs): when two or more

Trade agreements facilitate the free exchange of goods and services between nation-states, and contribute to varying degrees to complete economic integration between two or more states. Autarky refers to a non-trading status, a phenomenon rarely seen in today’s increasingly integrated globe. The steps taken to fully integrate are referred to as stages, a categorization that makes evident the variability in degree of integration. At the first stage, a preferential trade area can be set up as a less formal means of encouraging trade by enacting preferential tariffs to target specific countries’ exports (usually developing countries), in addition to other unilateral trade benefits. Free trade areas are the next step up along the full

Accounting for 20 percent of global imports and exports, the European Union (EU) is the world’s biggest trader. This should not come as a surprise because free trade among its members is one of the founding principles of the EU. With trade policy being in the exclusive jurisdiction of the EU, this creates new market opportunities for European exporters, workers and investors. The creation of this global market also creates the need for the EU to protect the interest of its 28 members from serious injury by resolving trade issues that go far beyond tariffs.

Oh (2012) acknowledges the growing regional trade integration, and claims East Asia rivals that of Europe and North America regarding both integration and proportion of global economic trade. Oh, remarks that the region lacks comparable institutions, however, which contributes to “incompatible” groupings that “compete for primacy” (Oh 2012, 106). Just because East Asia experiences economic integration, argues Oh, does

When trading in an international market, a company must understand the ways, countries can interfere with trade. These trade barriers, according to Kishore Kulkarni’s book on International Economics, cause trade to “diverge from the comparative advantage pattern” (pg.266). David Ricardo’s comparative advantage “is an economic law that demonstrates the ways in which protectionism is unnecessary in free trade” (pg.145). This section will provide an in-depth look at the trade restriction known as a tariff.

In the actual free trade context in the globalized nation, it is referring to a freedom for businesses to trade between countries at no barrier from government intervention which includes imposing tax on the products and services, subsidies, import and export quota limitation, as well as imposing trade legislation. However, this cannot be realized in today’s world (White, 2008) due to the fact that each country needs to protect and balance between the three major aspects which is the social, economy and politic domestically in order to compete in the competitive world and at the same time contribute to peace of the world. This is especially true for the developing countries such as Malaysia, China, India and et cetera as compared to the

Free trade is a policy that is followed by international markets in which those countries governments do not restrict imports or exports. Free trade generally includes the trade of goods without taxes or tariffs, free access to markets, trade agreements, and the inability to interfere with markets through a government enacted monopoly or oligopoly power. This paper will look at how free trade came about and the unequal benefit between nations in the system of free trade.

Free trade agreements create a free flow of goods, services, investment and people.The Doha Development round was a multilateral trade agreement between the member countries of WTO. The primary objective of the Doha round was to provide opportunities to developing countries into the world trading system; it covered about twenty areas of trade, market access for non-agricultural products and some intellectual property issues. However, even after sincere efforts, evidence suggests that developing countries did not gain much from Doha development round of tariff negotiation. This paper analyses the World Trading systems, Free Trade and Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiation.

There is a saying, “There are gains from trade. Because of trading, we are now driving the fancy sporty cars such as Lamborghini and Ferrari which are produced by Italy; and Italian are using the hottest smart phone which designed by American”. Trading brings a huge benefit for these two countries which is sharing and gaining their superior production to each other. However, nothing can be accomplished without norms or standards. Although trading has diversified advantages, it could be some risks hidden back. For instance, drugs trading and arms trading can endanger national security. Therefore, we need to make up trading agreement to regularize trading among those countries to ensure any trading activities are legal and safety. The World Trade Organization (WTO) which was called General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is an intergovernmental organization which regulates international trade( ). The WTO manages regulation of exchange between the interest nation by giving a structure to arrange exchange assertions and a debate determination procedure to authorize the members’ adherence to WTO understandings, which are marked by agents of part government and confirmed by their parliament.( )THE WTO current has 160 member states which is one of the biggest trade organization. United States has participated in WTO since 1995 and was a member of GATT since 1948. Therefore, United States has built favorable economic relations within WTO member countries. However; United

Founded in 1995, the World Trade Organization (WTO)—formally known as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)—would officially commence in the late 20th century with more than 123 nations taking part. The intergovernmental organization, which was established to regulate international trade, replaced GATT as of April 15th, 1994 following the signing of the Marrakesh Agreement by more than 120 global nations, and was officially legitimized more than 20 years ago on January 1st 1995 following GATTS’s unsuccessful attempt in creating an International Trade Organization in 1948 (WTO, 2016). It is of vital importance to understand the history of GATT and its eventual development into what is known today as the World Trade