Questions On Law And Property Law

B. Those who oppose GMO’s will tell you the opposite. They say that GMOs are created in a lab with methods totally different from natural breeding methods. The say GMO’s can be toxic, allergenic, or less nutritious, they are not adequately regulated, and they actually increase pesticide use, as well as, create serious problems for farmers.

Protection of intellectual property are investments based on acquired knowledge, thought and effort by one or multiple individuals on behalf of themselves, the business they work for when the property is created, and a financial investment. Each of these – acquired knowledge, thought, physical effort, financial investment – have a value that can be attached as it relates the usefulness or importance of the resulting product. That value will have a level of importance to the individual(s) creating the product and if applicable, the investor providing the funds in support of the creation.

An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Author(s): Stanley M. Besen and Leo J. Raskind Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter, 1991), pp. 3-27 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942699 . Accessed: 24/11/2011 08:39

Intellectual property protects legal rights and ownership in the market place through ‘intellectual property rights’. This can include trademarks, copyright, industrial design and patens. These protect brand names, designs and inventions.

build upon the foundation that agriculturalists laid down and took it beyond what was thought and imagined, creating pros and cons for the genetically enhanced substances.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (n.d.) helps one understand the importance of protecting intellectual property. They have spelled out several reasons of this importance including inventing new works in technology and culture, which allows progress to be made that, can be utilized worldwide. In addition, the legal protection of intellectual property encourages the commitment of additional resources for further modernization. Finally, promoting and protecting intellectual property encourages economic growth. It creates new jobs and industries. Protecting intellectual property also enhances the quality and

Intellectual property represents ideas created by minds of humans that require certain rights for their use. Intellectual property gives companies a competitive advantage and attracts the attention of other business partners and investors (Lee, 2016). With such importance, it is necessary for the law to protect these ideas from being used by unauthorized individuals. To shield from this, trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are used to protect the ownership of intellectual property (Legal Information Institute).

One reason is for inventors and corporations to have an advantage over another company. The products and ideas need to be protected from duplication from competing businesses and inventors (GIPC, 2009). Intellectual property motivates economic growth and creates competitiveness in people and business (GIPC, 2009). In this day and age people are always looking for the next best thing and if anyone was able to create the identical item as another company then there would be a rush to market on many items that are the same and there would be less need for protection. In reality this can also create jobs and grow a local community that recently fell on hard times (GIPC, 2009). The protection of intellectual property rights help purchasers in making well-rounded and knowledgeable decisions on the products safety, reliability, and effectiveness of their purchases (GIPC,

In these essay, I will like to find pros and cons of GMO products. In my research, I will be using academic resources and analysis to fit in to my presentation. The main point of why I choose GMO as my topic it that I would like to find out the truth about GMO, is it harmful or useful to the world.

The advancement of technology has lead to many scientists conducting more experiments with gene modification. This has lead to scientists to isolate certain genes that may cause a certain disease, thus modified genes may change the organism in a particular way. It may help farmers with crop cultivation and reduce crop infestation. It may also help farmers to be able to cultivated crops or keep animals that are prawn to drought resistance. Before, I go in details explain the importance of why businesses that develop modified organisms should be able to preserve their property rights by patenting such organisms or why such organism should not be patentable. I would like to briefly explain the history of patenting. For over two hundred years living organisms have been excluded from patent laws; life forms were considered a “product of nature” and not a human invention. “The non-patentable status of living organisms changed with the 1980 landmark Supreme Court case Diamond v. Chakrabarty,” (W3 Unisa, 2005). The court decided in a narrow 5-4 decision that a strain of bacteria that had been modified by the insertion of new genes was patentable because it was not naturally occurring. The foreign genes gave the bacteria the ability to break down hydrocarbons, and its “inventors” hoped it might be useful for cleaning up oil spills. Historically, patents were initially developed to insure and protect inventors and to make sure that they could benefit

Genetically modified organisms are living organisms that have been artificially manipulated in a laboratory through genetic engineering. This relatively new science creates unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and viral genes that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods. “Genetic engineering works because all genes have the same basic structure and work in the same way. Thus, they are in a sense interchangeable (Yount).” Genetically modified organisms are uncontrollable, and dangerous to humans and the environment and humans should not be eating anything that has been

dfdf, affiliates, representatives, licensors, and licensees, against any claim arising from content you submit as well as content submitted by a third party using your computer or IP address. You also agree that neither PaperRater nor anyone acting on its behalf has any responsibility to you or to any third party for your breach of these Terms of Use or from violating a third party's rights, such as intellectual property rights.

"Everything is achievable through technology," said Howard Stark in the movie Iron Man. Not everything has been achievable yet, but at least we are living in the world where it is possible to modify particular DNAs in plants in order to make them resistant to climate changes, insects, or herbicide or to enhance their nutritions and flavors. This has brought positive implications on our society but also numerous controversies and debates. I, too, had a misconception like most people do until I read one article pointing out ─ criticizing ─ baseless rumors about GMO. I did a brief research and figured out that a lot of anti-GMO claims were exaggerated and even groundless sometimes. Advanced science that is closely related to our food consumption is considered as one of important social issues, I wanted to learn pros and cons and resolve some misunderstandings through the research as a brief fact ascertainment.

This essay will begin with a synopsis of the principal legal questions raised in Hodkin, progressing to examine and clarify those synopses as appropriate. The judges ' methods of legal interpretation will also be set out and considered, as well as these methods ' difference to the primary modes of interpretation used by the law lords of Segerdal. Finally, the arguments of the appellants and the judges ' decision to regard them as superfluous to the point will be indicated and outlined in summary.

Firstly, with laws to protect intellectual properties, it prevent and stop other companies from commercially using the protected intellectual properties in the marketplace, allowing the owner company to control the usage of their original