Questions On Scientific Management And Organizational Behavior

Scientific management was introduced by Fredrick Winslow Taylor in 1898. The basic attributes of this perspective were giving incentives to employees, training them in a standard method and developing a standard procedure of performing a task. These procedures were established by numerous studies and observations (Samson et al., 2012).

The fundamental theory behind scientific management is breaking down each part of a job to its science (Taylor). In the Principles of Scientific Management, Taylor talks about pig iron handlers, shoveling and bricklaying as a few examples in which he implemented scientific management. He proposed four important elements that are essential to scientific management. In this example Taylor discusses the science of bricklaying. First management must develop the science of bricklaying with standard rules of each task. Every task is designed to be perfect and standardized. The second element is selection and training. This step is important because Taylor wants an employee who is “first class,” meaning that they are the best at what they do, follow instructions and will not refuse to listen or adopt the new methods that management is executing. The third element is teaching the first class employee the science of bricklaying broken down by management. At this stage management is instructing the employee what to do, how to do it, and the best way to do it. Management is there to help them and watch that they are doing it “their” way and not

Frederick Winslow Talyor developed a theory called the Scientific Management. It is a theory of management that analyse and improve work process, aiming to increase labour productivity. Scientific management methods are used to optimize productivity and simplifying the jobs so that workers could be trained to perform their task in one “best” way.

The year 1911 saw Frederick Winslow Taylor publish a book titled ‘The principles of scientific management’ in which he aimed to prove that the scientific method could be used in producing profits for an organization through the improvement of an employee’s efficiency. During that decade, management practice was focused on initiative and incentives which gave autonomy to the workman. He thus argued that one half of the problem was up to management, and both the worker and manager needed to cooperate in order to produce the greatest prosperity.

Scientific management is not a process that allows development of people. It limits their ability to take ownership of what they do. Kellogg’s staff are encouraged to be creative and use their imagination to contribute towards change. Consequently, Taylor’s view of monetary reward for output is not appropriate for the motivation required for this type of workplace.

It could be said that Fredrick Winslow Taylor’s scientific management theory is still significantly relevant to management practices the 21st century. By analysing both critics and advocates of Taylor’s theory, we are able to gain a comprehensive insight into Taylor’s contribution to the improved productivity, higher efficiency and greater consistency in the current business world. In conjunction with this, suggestions have been made that scientific management exercises poor working conditions, dehumanizing effects and in this century is rather diminishing in importance. Considering both of these views allows for the development of understanding as to what extent scientific management has had a relevant impact on management practises

According to Miller (2010) Scientific management (Taylorism) was devised by Frederick Taylor to improve economic efficiency especially labor productivity by analyzing and establishing workflows. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to the engineering of processes and to management. Taylor’s scientific management was based on four principles. The first is replacing the “rule of thumb” work methods with methods based on a scientific study. The second is selecting, training and developing the most suitable person for the job. The third principle is managers should give out detailed instructions on how to do the job scientifically and supervise workers. The last principle is dividing the tasks between managers and workers. This paper will discuss if these scientific management principles are outdated in the study of organizations. I will present the principles and explain their relevance in current organizations.

The manifestation of Frederick Taylor's theory of scientific management was a major breakthrough in traditional approach to management process, and employing a healthy degree of scientific management would remedy the problem of low visibility in Google. Scientific Management is an approach that emphasizes 1) A clear division of tasks and responsibilities; 2) determining the “one best way” of performing a task; 3) Scientific selection of best person for the newly designed job; 4) Ensuring workers are trained to perform the job the “one best way”; and 5) Strict surveillance of workers using a hierarchy of authority and close supervision. Organizations using scientific management are defined as “Collectives oriented to the pursuit of specific goals and exhibit formalized structures” (Scott, p. 29). A basic tenet of scientific management was that employees were not highly educated and thus were unable to perform any but the simplest tasks. Thus, Taylor, who advanced the theory, advocated that work should be reduced to a series of routine, predictable and standardized tasks. He also assumed that workers are motivated by money so he introduced payment on a piecework basis as an incentive which would increase productivity. The phrase “a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work” was used by Taylor to motivate workers to work harder.

Scientific management is the study of work methods to improve efficiency, suggesting that management should take complete responsibility for planning the work and making sure that workers primary focus was implementing the plan that management had in place. Fredrick Taylor was an example of scientific management. Bart focus was being efficient and to that Bart had a keen understanding of tasks that needed to be completed along with hiring and training the workers to the point that all workers could complete and perform tasks in an efficient and effective way.

Since everything is intertwined with management scientists need to have a broader vision in solving the issues with zero impact on their projects. Mistaking silence for the agreement and absences for laziness, one can ever evolve as a good scientist that can manage his own lab or group of people. The author here provided some common problems in which scientists are facing in their regular life. They include the evaluation of employee performance and his attendance levels. Ability to control his own technicians and lab managers is a key aspect in running a lab successfully.

As the course suggests, there are various theories to lead by. The Scientific Management theory suggests that standard work flow and work conditions give the best outputs and that proper planning, effective training and careful recruitment are parts of scientific management. I agree whole-heartedly with F. W. Taylor in this theory and I plan on looking for ‘one best way’ to do any task so that quality can be assured in the coming future. Along with that, a clear but concise bureaucracy needs to exist so that elements such as chain of command, order, unity of direction, unity of command and lines of authority can be well defined.

Although many people believe in Taylors scientific management functions Lawerence (2010), Green (1986) both argue that that this is not the case and that scientific management is the problem in today’s management. Although there

(Answer 1) The principle of scientific management is about the study of human behaviour and physiology. A sustainable approach to managing the operations to reduce water and energy consumption, improve production efficiency and increase output. For this purpose, utilising the principle of scientific management will help reach the highest labour productivity and maximum efficiency. This will help organisation to reach their common goal and achieve the highest efficiency is to use scientific and standardized management methods.

The scientific management theory have an assumption that workers are lazy, not smart in analyzing tasks, only prefers simplified work and only works for money (Miller & Form, 1964). According to Taylor (2004), workers are unable figure out the most efficient way in doing work. Therefore, they are thought as replaceable working parts like a machine in the production line and can be trained to specialize in a certain procedure in the production. They are assumed to adopt the Protestant work ethic, working for long hours and not taking any breaks. Whenever a worker or a ‘part’ failed to perform its tasks, they

The term scientific management is the combination of two words i.e. scientific and management. The word "Scientific" means systematic analytical and objective approach while "management" means getting things done through others. Scientific management theory seeks to improve an organization 's efficiency by systematically improving the efficiency of task completion by utilizing scientific, engineering, and mathematical analysis. The goal is to reduce waste, increase the process and methods of production, and create a just distribution of goods. This goal serves the common interests of employers, employees, and society.