Questions On The Health Care

As the healthcare system prepares to select a outsource company as its vendor for this project, what types of information should it give to and gather from each vendor under consideration?

There are two common ways to handle a medical error. One is by blaming the individual or things when the error occurs, called it the “culture of blame”. The other one is by focusing on the safety goal using effective systems and teamwork, called “culture of safety". We may say that one is more applicable than the other, or maybe one is more beneficial than the other. In real life though, only one can be applied in a healthcare system, the one that is proven effective regardless its origin, pragmatic, or .

Given the complexity of healthcare system today, effective and efficient collaboration and communication among team members is critical to ensure patient safety. Daniel & Rosentein (2008) reported that during a typical patient’s hospital stay, a patient may interact with 50 different employees that may include doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians, etc. They also reported that when healthcare professional are not communicating and collaborating effectively, patient safety is at risk for several reasons: break in communication flow, misinterpretation of information, incorrect telephone orders and overlooked orders.

Continuous and life-long learning- Unlike other professions in healthcare field one has to keep in pace with the updates going on, know the new technology,

Patient safety is of major concern in healthcare settings due to the preventable nature of events that sometimes lead to serious injury, and even death, for patients. This was catapulted to the forefront of healthcare delivery in 1999 when the Institute of Medicine wrote a scathing report; To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, that highlighted "the lack of safety for patients in healthcare organizations" (Ulrich and Kear 2014). The National Patient Safety

As the Joint Commission aims to nationally improve health care systems through health care organizations collaborations, it publishes recommended patient safety goals. As stated by the Joint Commission, “the first obligation of health care is to “do no harm””. The Joint Commission’s 2015 National Patient Safety Goals for hospitals include : Identify patients correctly; Improve staff communication; Use

House Resolution (H.R.) 370 was introduced to Congress on January 9th, 2017 by Republican Rep. Bill Flores of Waco, Texas. The bill itself is quite simple, totaling two pages in length. The main purpose of the bill is repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), completely restoring or reviving the laws it amended as if it had never existed. Unlike similar repeals to the ACA, this bill does not have a replacement plan or any sort of alternate plan. It simply takes the ACA away and restores the law to their pre-ACA state. This is concerning for many reasons, but it may also have some benefits as well. The future of America’s health care is ever changing and it is more important

It is critical in today’s health care field to avoid harm and ensure that patient safety in health care environment, especially with the attention of medical mistakes little is known about the importance of avoidable harm to public. The mistakes that happen in the healthcare setting are rarely the fault of individual workers, but usually the result of problems within the system that they work.

Health care is our nation’s greatest strength and most serious challenge. The organizing, financing, and delivery of health care in the United States is affected by a broad range of forces such as public, private, national, as well as local (Shi & Singh, 2015). The main theme of the Obama campaign of 2008, was to change health care provisions that were preventing American’s from accessing adequate health care. In March 21010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed by the U.S. congress and signed into law by President Obama, aimed at creating significant changes that impact every health care organization (Shi & Singh, 2015). The PPACA was enacted with the goal of increasing the quality and affordability of health insurance and this goal is achieved by increasing the Medicaid coverage for low income, uninsured-adults under 65 years of age, with income up to 138% of the federal poverty level (Ayanian, 2013). Moreover, the Medicaid expansion demands for the full practice of advanced practice nurses, with the increase in the number of insured population and this will provide more autonomy in practice for advanced practice nurses. This paper discusses in detail about the PPACA, and one of its key components “Medicaid expansion policy’.

According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, To Err Is Human, the majority of medical errors result from faulty systems and processes, not individuals (Hughes, 2008). However, due to processes that are inefficient and variable, multiple health insurance, differences in provider education and experience, and other factors that contribute to the complexity of health care the IOM has put together six aims of health care that is effective, safe, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable (Hughes, 2008).

Currently, the issue of health insurance has been a bone of contention for the public regarding whether the United States government should provide this health plan or not. People often possess different perspectives and refer to pros and cons on both sides of the spectrum. While some believes a universal healthcare system will set a foundation for a lower quality of service, increasing governmental finance deficit, and higher taxes, others do not hold the same thought. A universal healthcare system brings enormous advantages rather than disadvantages, such as all-inclusive population coverage, convenient accessibility, low time cost, and affordable medical cost, all of which not only provide minimum insurance to the disadvantaged but also improve the efficiency of medical resources distribution.

Mr. Smith has straight Medicare insurance, he is eligible for 100 days of in-patient rehabilitation in hospital or skilled nursing home after his hip replacement. Giving him enough time to recover. Thus, individual’s recovery with managed care is impacted by the limited days allowed by the insurance personnel. That affects the recovery and also the safety of the person after discharge from the nursing home. Eventually affecting the facility’s reputation and also limiting financial reimbursement to the facility.

Giving birth, unexpected deaths, or a work related accident are few of the examples that could occur in the life of a working American, but when a tragic event as such takes place, a family is in dire need stay financially afloat. Thankfully, the United States government gives Americans healthcare and insurance to keep the average family from living on the streets. Healthcare is very beneficial for underprivileged civilians, yet thieves have learned how to take advantage of the corrupt system, leaving those in legitimate need suffering and struggling. The United States should continue to provide health care to Americans, but they should put limitations on the aide to prevent scams, give the insurance to only those in dire need, and find alternative

The majority of Americans have never thought about what would happen if they were unable to make their own decisions regarding health care. Our knowledge in medicine is rapidly growing every single day. For example, machines have been created that are capable of keeping a person alive even after they have been declared brain dead. Brain Death is defined as the irreversible loss of brain function (Steadman, 2002), and is also referred to as cerebral death. With the knowledge of all the possibilities surrounding health care such as advance directives and euthanasia, it is now possible to make informed decisions about our own medical treatment. By the late 1960’s, Americans were fighting for their right to make these choices; it’s their life,

There are many things wrong with the current healthcare system in America. When thinking of taking on a universal healthcare plan, there are many things one must consider. Who would be eligible for it? How would it affect those who already have insurance, and how would it financially affect the economy? It is quite obvious that people below poverty level have access to public health programs, such as Medicaid. What needs to be taken into consideration is that people who are poor, barely "above" "poverty”, “middleclass" "and" those who do not have health insurance are highly "affected" (Rashford 7). Many people suffer on various levels due to inadequate access to appropriate healthcare. The "number" of people who are