Questions On The Individual And Individuals

Drug abuse has always been a very delicate question as it always it deals with the health, well-being and even lives of human beings belonging to any country. Many people have argued that mandatory drug testing is a violation of their civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment grants you the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, otherwise known as a person's right to privacy. However, employers have the right to know whether or not the people working under them are stable to do their jobs. Indeed, for safety of all the humans randomly drug testing is the best way to maintain the quality of the employees.

Many grievances can be resolved without the involvement of third parties by correcting a misunderstanding between the employee and management, or with a simple negotiation between the employee and management. However, the grievance may involve a more difficult issue, or one or more of the parties involved may refuse to settle with a just a simple negotiation between the employee and management. Therefore the grievance form should be filled out in detail. “Grievances are usually written out at the first or second step” (Holley et al, 2008, p.420). The important part of the report is to have the complainant’s name. It should also include when the incident occurred, the chief complaint, and the resolution sought by the employee.

The issue of drug testing in the workplace has sparked an ongoing debate among management. There are many who feel that it is essential to prevent risks to the greater public caused by substance abuse while on the job. However, others believe that the costs far outweigh the benefits and that it is an invasion of privacy. Putting all ethical issues aside, evidence presented in this paper supports the latter. The costs of drug testing are excessive and only a small percentage of employees are actually found to be substance users. Drug testing in the work place has a negative effect on productivity; contrary to what was originally intended. It actually decreases productivity

Major corporation's require drug tests for people applying for a job position. This is a good way for companies to make sure they don't hire employees with substance abuse problems. Hiring people with substance abuse problems is common in the NFL. This is concerning because the NFL requires a drug test for all players entering the league. Collegiate players entering the draft are tested before they can become eligible for the NFL. If a person applying for a corporate position gets caught with drugs in his system, they will be dismissed

When an employer pays a person to perform a job, the employer has the right to conduct a drug test. The law requires employers to protect the health information of their employees so therefore, if the results of a drug test are kept private, then the employee’s privacy was not invaded.

Drug testing is the evaluation of a urine, blood, hair or other type of bio. Drug testing is one action an employer can take to determine if employees or job applicants are using drugs. It can identify evidence of recent use of alcohol, prescription drugs and illegal drugs logical sample to determine if the subject has been using the drug or drugs in question. There are many circumstances

drug testing has become very common in both the workplace and schools within the last twenty years or so. generally, urine testing is the most common form of drug screening. many people are creative in their efforts to beat drug tests and have formulated many products to mask the appearance of drugs in the system. products such as masking chemicals and even synthetic urine are widely available, and even the most severe cases of drug abuse may go undetected. because of the ever-expanding market of products designed to help a drug user pass a screening, many employers are turning to hair follicle drug testing.

Throughout recent years, applicant drug testing has become one of the most prevalently used strategies by many organizations to control substance abuse in the workplace. Drug testing is a selection tool used by organizations to determine whether or not an individual has previously used drugs and/or alcohol. Most employers find that drug testing, if done correctly, is a worthwhile investment associated with increased workplace safety, lower absenteeism, fewer on-the-job accidents, improved productivity, lower theft rates, and less medical and workers' compensation expenses (Grondin 142). By identifying and screening out substance abusers, organizations believe that they are also screening out those

During the interview process an employer needs to mention that there will be a drug test administered if the candidate is offered employment, this is to prevent hiring individuals who use drugs. The (ADA) prohibits pre-employment testing for alcohol use. Post-accident. When an incident happens at the workplace employee(s) need to be drug tested. Testing the injured employee, the employee who caused the accident will need to go to a separate facility where blood can be drawn to test for drugs or alcohol. Random. An unannounced, unpredictable basis for any employee whose information has been placed in a computer generated data base. Employees can be randomly tested for any given reason, after completing treatment for drug and alcohol addiction and if there is suspicion an employee is abusing drugs. Periodical: Drug testing can be administered monthly, quarterly, or yearly depending on the companies polices. Returning to work: once an employee has completed the required treatment for substance abuse they must be tested and have a negative test to be able to return to

Drug testing has become a very big issue for many companies. Approximately eighty-one percent of companies in the United States administer drug testing to their employees. Of these, seventy-seven percent of companies test employees prior to employment. Even with the commonality of drug testing, it is still a practice that is generally limited to larger corporations which have the financial stability, as well as the human resources to effectively carry out a drug testing program. In the United States, it is suggested that as many as 70 percent of drug users are employed. Now this is a huge chunk, but as a result of drug testing, these big corporations have a significantly lower percentage of the employed drug users on their

This would conclude that drug testing programs did not meet these expectations. This paper will support the idea that drug testing in the work place does not increase productivity, and that it costs more money than it saves for those businesses.

The EAP is set up by an employer with the utmost respect towards the employee and will assist with counseling, referrals, or any legal issues the worker may face. 5.) Drug Testing; Drug Testing is part of most companies’ initial screening for pre-employment. Employers will use these tests to determine if you will be qualified for a position. If you are hired many companies then follow up with random, periodic, or after-accident testing. Although drug testing is part of the Drug Free Workplace Program, most of the time it cannot accurately determine if a person was or has been under the influence at a specific time in the case that an accident has occurred. The addition of a solid Drug Free program should be standard for all companies. By including drug tests as a pre-employment condition, a corporation can only enhance their effectiveness. An organization thinking of implementing a plan should consider several different factors before putting their plan into action. The U.S. Department of Health and

Sabela HobbsMr. ArmstrongEnglish Comp. II.28 September 2017Drugs or MoneyDo pre-employment drug tests interfere with a person’s privacy life? Many people may have different opinions about drug tests. Although there are different ways to deal with drug testing, it has come to be a main priority in the workplace, playing sports, etc. Drug tests can be problematic for someone who does not want people to know their personal business. People feel as though drug tests are not essential because they expose more than just drug usage. Although many people do not agree with drug tests, many others do. There are ways that drug testing can be used proficiently so it can be both reasonable and considerate for both parties. Drug testing is done in several ways. It is a test to determine the presence of any type of drug usage of an employee at a workplace or an athlete that plays sports. It is a test that can be run using urine, blood, breathing, hair, sweat, and oral fluid. Normally, drug tests take place before a person is hired or during the season of a sport. However, drug testing can be performed in a workplace or sports institution. Some people believe that a drug test should be mandatory before working or playing a sport, others do not. Most jobs and sports require people to take a drug test before being hired, because it has

In order to keep organization ethical as it relates to drug testing, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved four methods for drug testing. The organization can request a blood, breath, hair, or urine tests. These tests will not harm the job candidate or employee. The company will send the job candidate or employee to an off-site medical

According to Joseph Desjardins and Ronald Duska’s Drug Testing in Employment, administering a drug test before and during employment may be popular but is mostly unnecessary and a