R&R Case

All trial procedures in Canada are based on the adversarial system, this involves both the Crown and the defence. In our case R.v. Tisi since we were the Crown it was our job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt (doubt based on reason and common sense) that the accused committed the offence. For someone to be convicted, actus reus (wrongful deed) and mens rea (guilty mind) to be present for the offence to be proven. In R.v.Tisi, Donovan Tisi was charged with robbery and assault causing bodily harm resulting in a summary conviction. In the Criminal Code, assault causing bodily harm is under section 267(a) is defined as “Everyone who in, committing an assault, (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation thereof, or” Tisi was

Company has evolved to handle joint ventures, but not all of them turn into successes.

Looking at the generic strategy we find that REI’s strategic position to create a completive advantage is to create a high value and high cost brand by catering closely to membership needs and vision. REI essentially has positioned themselves as unique with their differentiation strategy by offering a wide range of products along with a high level of customer service and product expertise.

After having a very successful performance and getting second place on the first Littlefield simulation game we knew what we needed to do to win the second simulation game. We were very eager to outperform our competition and we almost did so, but ended up in second place again with a cash balance of $2,660,393.

The criminal justice system plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, as the system aims to protect all members of the community fairly and equally. However, in the criminal case of R v Loveridge, it is evident that the justice system fails to apply the law to equally balance the needs of the victims and the community. In this case, the offender Kieran Loveridge pleaded guilty to five counts of offences; three charges of common assault, one charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and one charge of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act, the victim being Thomas Kelly, Loveridge received 4 years’ non-parole for manslaughter, Loveridge’s total effective sentence therefore is 7 years and 2 months with an effective

This memo is intend to present appropriate treatment of the ARO estimation problem experienced by the Lack of Information (LOI) based on the findings from interviews with all 50 of the warehouse managers and on-site visits at each of the 50 locations of its warehouses countrywide. The onsite observations search for any evidence of damages in both the on-site property like the roof, walls, floors and general conditions. The interview with the managers obtains information about the characteristics of the warehouses that are not readily observable. The information obtained is very important in the preparation of the fiscal

In the R. v. Stinchcombe case, a lawyer was charged with breach of trust, theft and fraud. His former secretary was a Crown witness at the opening of the investigation. She provided relevant evidence towards the defence. Former to trial, she was interviewed by an RCMP officer and a tape‑recorded statement was taken. Far along during the progress of the trial, she again was interviewed by a police officer with a written statement taken. The defence counsel was notified of the occurrence but not of the statements. His request for a disclosure was declined. However, throughout the trial, the defence counsel acknowledge without a doubt that the witness would not be called by the Crown and required an order that the witness be called or that the Crown disclose the main statements to the defence. The trial continued and the accused was found guilty of breach of trust and fraud. Conditional stays were entered with respect to the theft counts. The

On Sunday, 04/29/2018, at approximately 1030 hours, S1 Alfonso Cerpa was arrested for being in possession of a stolen vehicle. This occurred in the area of Sullivan Avenue and 280 south. Cerpa was later released per 849(b) PC with a complaint sought.

The case R.v. Flett, 2013 the defence counsel was Darren M. Sawchuk who represented the accused, Lulonda Lynn Flett and for the Crown Elizabeth Thomson represented the Her Queen The Majesty, Judgement was delivered on June 13 2013. Lulonda Lynn Flett, 41 went to a rooming house located at 288 Austin Street, Winnipeg on July 16th 2011 and set fire to a couch on the front porch. She was angry at her boyfriend’s mother for calling the police as a result of the fight she had with him, she also blamed her because of an arrest warrant, for the fight she had with her boyfriend's sister Lynette. Also Ms. Flett had said that she would “burn the house down” which she said in a fit of uncontrollable anger when she was drunk. Firefighters brought six people out of the

The primary viewpoint of the Charter was the dominance of the rights and the fairness of the judicial system. Two related Charter rights complimented this case: the right to counsel under s. 10(b) and the right against self-incrimination under s. 11(c). In addition, as mentioned earlier, the right remain silent was an issue. Majority found that these rights granted Hebert right to be free of coercion by the police, but also the right to choose whether or not to give a statement.

In the Johnson and Johnson Company efforts to improve the quality of life for people everywhere while still maintaining a standard of employee and customer service. Mark Simpson had an incident that J&J never before had and that was violence in the work place. Mark Simpson being the HR manger had to deal with this work place assault in a timely and professional manner, because this experience will be the template for future action plans. This type of case can set precedents. Mark needs to come up with the best alternatives to present this to Mr. Perry the VP of HR department. J&J cares about its employees just as they care about its community and customers. J&J

“need” of usage, stemming for lifestyle choices. As the barrier to entry is relatively low

“Manslaughter - Recklessness or gross negligence - Assumption of duty of care for infirm person - Breach of duty amounting to recklessness - Negligence - Assumption of duty to care.”

Overall, value was created by Reiss's experience in the logistics and lead time concerns of manufacturing in the toy industry. The whole project began when Reiss was able to spot an opportunity based on his knowledge of the U.S. and Canadian relationship of sales in the gaming industry. In most cases, games would be developed in the U.S. and then sell roughly ten percent of their volume in Canada. However, Reiss spot an emerging game called Trivial Pursuit having success being developed and marketed in Canada. He realized that the game could be ten times more successful in the U.S. market. Therefore he designed an opportunity for a similar game in the U.S. based on the market's cultural preferences. Four different aspects made this opportunity possible and these include:

R&R R&R case brings up major themes that we will see over and over again in this course. This case also differs significantly from most of the other case you will read in this course as it provides a full story of an entrepreneurial venture. In most other cases in this course, the entrepreneur is faced with a decision/dilemma at the time of case. In these cases I will ask you to put yourself in the entrepreneur’s shoes and come up with a course of action that you would undertake if you were in the same situation. Turning back to the R&R case, clearly Bob Reiss appears to be a successful entrepreneur but it is worth digging for factors that may explain why he was