Race Cars Vs Weapons

“A Chicago Uber driver who’s licensed to carry a gun wounded a gunman who was firing on a crowd of people”-Source A. This is claimed as self defense and what do you think will happen if that courageous cab driver left that gunman alone? The crowd will die, including the driver, and worse things will happen. When somebody is trained properly, guns are the best way of self defense and a ban takes their hobby away. Many people believe that school shootings like Sandy Hook happen because of guns. Important to realize, this is false because the shooter grew up being picked every day and caused depression and stress through his life. As Source C states, “gun owners need to grieve us”, not all of them do. In effect, not only self-defense, but also recreational activities is also a purpose for being against gun control. In Source B, it states that, “People want to own guns for recreational purposes.” Several people who own firearms utilize them for deer hunting while others. As an illustration, there is a sport called Action Shooting which people utilize firearms to see how many targets they could hit. Although this may be true, there is more to

On the other side, there are those that reference the persistence of accidental injuries and fatalities that are gun related. People on this side of the debate argue for the banishment of guns, for stricter gun control laws, and for restrictions on certain kinds of high caliber guns and ammunition. They argue for the safety of the general population and for the lack of responsibility of those in possession of guns. They additionally reference the excessive amount of gun violence in media such as music, films, animation, and video games trying providing moderate to exceptional evidence that access to excessive violent imagery in conjunction with what they view as slack gun control policies is an equation for tragedies that society is unprepared to handle and should not have to. Each side of the gun control debate has

On the other hand, critics are concerned that guns should not be banned because owning guns are their right, and they can carry guns for self-defense. However, I still believe that guns should be banned because people use guns to kill others. Even though they use guns for self-defense, guns are easier weapons to kill someone. Gun owners engaging in self-defense are taking the law into their own hands which is wrong.

All these hand made weapons had a lot of range and body damage to others; first they tested their handmade objects to see were there any flaws that can be fixed for a better intension to make the weapon

Even individuals who support gun rights acknowledge that some kind of people should not be allowed to have weapons because of their records. Proponents who favor gun control laws don’t believe that state and federal gun control acts do enough, they think that we need more restrictions and control, and gun rights advocates believe that the laws go too far, they think that giving the right to the government to control the purchase of weapons and allow background checks will give them the opportunity to look into our private life, and nobody wants, nor likes to be observed. Existent gun control laws prevent criminals, mentally ill people, and kids from buying guns. Unfortunately, there have been cases where teenagers and criminals have acquired weapons and used them to commit mass murders, and some other situations where kids accidentally kill themselves while playing with their parent’s gun. Weapon technology, gun ownership and even gun control laws can have unexpected consequences. Until now, there is not a perfect gun control solution, there is no way to know if gun control will make the nation safer or more dangerous until we try. If the American government cannot adopt stronger gun control laws, maybe Americans can adopt safer ways to use their guns. Citizens, lawmakers and gun

I believe there are many pros and cons for both parties arguments. In the wrong hands, one gun is just as deadly as another, as well as knives, bats, and anything else that could be used as a weapon. It’s not the weapon that causes the problem, it is the phycology of the person behind the weapon. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. I do think there should be stricter monitoring of guns, registration, and who’s hands the guns truly are in. The development of stricter rules and laws for the person who actually commits the crime could also help to deter crimes involving guns. People who commit lethal crimes involving guns should receive mandatory death sentences. Punishing law abiding citizens who have every right under the 2nd Amendment to own a gun is not fair in my opinion. Restrictions should not be placed on responsible firearm owners.

The world is a dangerous place to live. Every day, we wake up, send our children off to school and spend most of our lives working. We put ourselves in harm’s way every time we leave our homes. At any moment, we could be killed in an automobile accident, plane crash, gunshot wound or any other random occurrence that happens in this crazy world we live in. There have been so many advancements in technology and medicine to protect ourselves from these lucks of the draw events that life throws at us, but some people seem to have a problem with gun ownership. Gun ownership for many is viewed like the seatbelt of a car or the vaccine given to us to prevent the Flu, it is a form of protection and security. Some people in our country would argue that there needs to be a banning of fire arms or more restrictions to keep fire arms out of people’s hands. I disagree with this idea. I feel that Federal and State governments should not bad firearms or make the purchasing process more difficult. It is every legal citizen right to bear arms, whether it is for protection or sport.

Each tool and weapon was made from certain items, and they each are used in a different way.

With all the murders that happen in our country, it’s only logical for people to want a way to protect not only themselves, but their loved ones as well. However, the opposing argument would be that having these weapons is what causes the problem. While this is correct, people can use everyday objects as weapons. They

There have been many instances where firearms have not been locked up correctly and a small child has gotten a hold of it and a loss of life has occured. These bad situations have been tragic but the only thing that can be blamed for it is one thing. Improper storage of firearms. If there are children in a household any weapon of any kind should always be locked up and out of reach of small fingers. These situations would not occur if people learned to take better care of their weapons and their kids. Children who are not yet old enough to understand the concept of the dangers of a gun and how to properly treat one should never be in reach of these potentially dangerous

Humans have used weapons in warfare, hunting, law enforcement, and criminal activity for thousands of years. Weapons also serve many other purposes in society including use in sports, collections for display, and historical displays and demonstrations. As technology has developed throughout history, weapons have changed with it.

Guns are major part of living in the United States of America. The U.S alone has 35% to 50% of the world's civilian owned Firearms. More than likely you have at least one in your house. As more and more guns are being produced and sold in the U.S more anti-gun activists are pushing for increased gun control but the facts show that more gun control actually means more gun related violence. There is no doubt that there is a problem with gun related violence in the U.S. but there is a perception that it has suddenly worsened but in all reality things are better that they have been in decades. Once again on the news you will hear that 30,000 people killed last year with guns. What the media does not say is that of those 30,000, 20,000 of those people killed themselves with a gun. Some of these facts are shocking to hear. Even though gun control is the first thing we turn to when gun related violence occurs the negative factors are far greater than the positives.

With the wake following the San Bernardino attack and an apparent increase in domestic gun violence and terrorism, the fear of guns and violence associated with them has skyrocketed in recent years. To many, a promising solution to this problem is gun control, essentially placing restrictions and regulations on guns. In some cases this has been proven effective, and instances such as exceptionally dangerous weapons or automatic weapons it seems a given to ban. However, a ban on conventional weapons is not as easy as many would like to believe, and even if they were banned, there does not seem to be much evidence to support the notion that it would end violence or mass shootings, or criminals gaining access to weapons. Regulations rather

The problem with guns is fairly obvious: they decrease the difficulty of killing or injuring a person. In Jeffrey A. Roth's Firearms and Violence (NIJ Research in Brief, February 1994), he points out the obvious dangers. About 60 percent of all murder victims in the United States in 1989 (about 12,000 people) were killed with firearms. Firearm attacks injured another 70,000 victims, some of whom were left permanently disabled. In 1985, the cost of shootings was an estimated $14 billion nationwide for medical care, long-term disability, and premature death. In robberies and assaults, victims are far more likely to die when the perpetrator is armed with a gun than when he or she has another weapon or is unarmed.

Furthermore, children growing up seeing these weapons that are made purely to kill can psychologically affect the ways that they see death and violence. RRR I mean, debates are being held, in America, over whether we should ban violent video games as they pose a threat to the way youths see life and guns even though the Americans allow guns in their country. Banning guns would kill two birds with one stone so to speak.