Race in Culture and Media
There are over seven billion people living today, each one of them is distinct and unique in their own way. The daily interactions and experiences shape our view on how we respond to the changes that we encounter in daily life. The way we behave in our mesosystems’ is a result of the influence of our microsystems. We grow emulating the behaviors and norms we observe relating with family and friends. Moreover, the media is a critical tool that shapes and instills in us certain values, views and perceptions. The person that one grows up to be is highly dependent on these factors which serves to define one’s sense of identity. In totality, our upbringing, culture and the media shape our concept of an authentic self.
…show more content…
Similarly, Wesley Yang is an estranged Asian American with no notion about his culture or language. He goes on to write: “…I, for instance, am the child of Korean immigrants but I do not speak my parents’ native tongue, I have never called my elder brothers by the proper honorific, “big brother” …” (Yang, 521). This is another example of a people who have lost their culture in a bid to fit in. Every immigrant dreams of equal opportunity for success in America. They believe the surest way to climb the social ladder is through sheer hard work as evidenced by the parents portrayed by Yang who ‘push’ their children to achieve the high grades in school to get the best of opportunities. Also Yoshino says “…I understand the reasons Asian parents have raised a generation this way. Doctor, Lawyer…are good jobs for whoever works hard enough for them”, (Yoshino 521). These parents raise their children in the stern Asian manner but fail to impart their cultural heritage so that the children can behave more like Americanized children.
Yang’s work illustrates Yoshino’s argument on compensating; it poses a hidden threat to our civil rights. He goes on to says: “...covering is a hidden assault on our civil rights…”, (Yoshino 540), “…We have not been able to see it as such because it has swaddled itself in the benign language of assimilation…”. This country has made huge strides in granting people their rights to social and political freedom and
Kenji Yoshino wrote an article named “The Pressure to Cover” which was published in the New York Times Magazine on January 15th, 2006. (Yoshino 32) The article focuses on how different sexual and racial groups are discriminated against. Yoshino’s article is an excerpt from his book called, Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. Yoshino argues that, “Discrimination used to take aim at entire social groups. Now it is directed at the members of those groups who refuse to assimilate to the mainstream.”(Yoshino 32) An important detail about Yoshino is that he is a male, Japanese homosexual.
Through the personal stories of his hair, love life, and behavior, Liu is able to show the effects of his assimilation. The second section deals with Liu’s struggles to conform to white stereotypes as an Asian American. With his personal anecdotes, he establishes himself as a more credible source to speak on the subject of assimilation. The second section uses narration to provide evidence about Liu’s definition of assimilation.
Covering, to cover is to hide something about yourself that is generally looked down up, to only fit better into mainstream society. In the New Civil rights by Kenji Yoshino imforms us on the concept of covering. Wesely Yang in paper tigers through differrent topics inderectly backs up Kenjis beliefs. Kenji explains why, even how we cover. Going as far as saying that everyone covers. Yang on the otherhand talks about the opression and life itself as a Asian American. Providing us many other people whom have had similar expieriances. The two back each others claims up. WEsely YAng agreees with Kenji Yoshino that everyone covers.
People of all races enjoy a good film or tv show but, they sometimes are not being represented equally. Representation matters because, it is important to teach the younger generations about their race’s worldview on what they find normal. Kenneth and Mamie Clark conducted a psychological study where, “children were shown two dolls, one black and one white. They were asked to choose which one they preferred, which one was ‘bad’ and which one was ‘good.’ The results were the same across races: the children generally preferred the white doll and saw that doll as ‘good’…. but it is really no surprise if you look at the media these children are consuming”(The
Over the last few decades, ever since the televisions and computers were invented, self ethnic identities have been influenced because of the progress in technology, which we commonly known as media, and whether the globe benefits from this approach or not has become a controversial issue amongst most of the people in the world. As what survey shows that a dominant group of peoples who tend to believe that identities were being ruined by spreading through mass-media which is the most inappropriate approach ever made because of it’s extremely destructive effects. For instance, one of my friends ignited the other’s hair
Ironically, today it is almost the opposite. Covering is enforced not by federal law, but by one’s own inhibition. This makes it seem like its in one’s own head, like it’s his or her fault and not societal expectations for being to scared to be his or her true self. People still feel the need to cover from our higher-ups and peers, despite the law protecting their civil rights. The need to cover has become more social than legislative, and therefore, more dangerous. Because it seems covering is imposed only by oneself, it acts invisible to the uncritical eye, and separates oneself from societal responsibility. About this, Yoshino says, “The real solution lies in all of us as citizens… These reason-forcing conversations should happen outside courtrooms - in workplaces and restaurants, schools and playgrounds, chat rooms and living rooms, public squares and bars. They should occur informally and intimately, where tolerance is made and unmade.”
The Asian American experience primarily narrates a story of hardship in assimilation into the American society. However, these stories are heavily nuanced depending on the generational perspective. The Asian American experience from the first generation emphasizes the practical concerns in surviving economically in a foreign land. On the other hand, the second generation recounts social and personal conflicts that primarily deal with questioning their identity. Given these differing Asian American narratives, these immigrant families are oftentimes confronted not only with clashing cultural values, but also mismatched perspectives on life. Asian American scholar, Erin Khue Nihn, examines these intergenerational conflicts using a socio-economic perspective in her novel, Ingratitude. Her argument builds on the economically driven mindset of the parental generation and concludes the following: “Asian American intimate relations reveal themselves to be profoundly ordered by capitalist logic and ethos" (Nihn 6). Employing Nihn 's interpretation, the parents enforce a strong adherence to their ethnic heritage, whereby these cultural reminders serve as a means of economic survival to provide stability within the nuclear family. Attempting to internalize these ethnic values while assimilating into society, the second generation becomes conflicted in resolving their Asian American identity. Essentially, the Asian
Growing up in a generation with high expectations of identity that are constantly altering whether it’s the latest trends, styles and even mind-set principles, can be over whelming. When asked to describe one-self, we often are stuck thinking of what particular word could fully describe who we are as a person. We have such a hard time of coming with just one word because there is no form of describing one’s self. How we see ourselves, we may not want to be that the next day. “Looks can be deceiving” or “the first impressions are the most important” is commonly instilled in our mindset which it is true to some extent. Our work
Popular culture is defined as “a composite of all the values, ideas, symbols, material goods, processes, and understandings that arise from mass media” (Atkins 131). It is well-known to the public and reinforces the way people see they world, including aspects such as race, ethnicity, and gender. According to Omi, popular culture “deals with the symbolic realm of social life, the images which it creates, represents, and disseminates contribute to the overall racial climate” (540). The individuals or groups belong to a specific race can be perceived based on their behavior portrayed by the mass media, instead of being recognized for who they truly are. Such effect created by the popular culture contributes to what is known as “racial stereotype”, which is “beliefs about differences in behavior associated with racial differences” (Jones 982).
Asian immigrants raised their children on the values of filial piety. Filial piety is based on Confucianism ideology which is one showing respect to one’s parent. American-born children are raised with two values which are Confucianism and the American values. The American values allow an individual to make their decisions either in their career, marriage, or lifestyle. Unlike, the American values, Confucianism decisions are decided by the parents, which have created tension in both generations. The immigrant parents stress the importance of a proper education to their children because the parents did not have the opportunity for education. Education was a privilege meaning only the families that had money could send their children to school. The parents began working at a young age to support their family and maintaining the household was more important than education. The immigrant parents are motivated by the “American Dream” instead of a financial benefit, the better the education and the employment, the more opportunities that would be offered. A person without a proper education would not succeed in life compared to the ones that have an education.
Adolescence is a time where an individual’s sense of identity starts to emerge and a majority of their social norms are perceived. In this day and age, adolescents live in a world heavily submerged around media, which plays an important and habitual part of an adolescents' life. In a national survey conducted in 2009, adolescents on average spend more than 7.5 hours using some sort of media a day (Rideout, Foehr, Roberts, 2010). With this unprecedented access to the world, individuals are learning and connecting with many different people and ideas through the media (Brown & Bobkowsi, 2011). With different forms of media playing an influential part in an adolescents’ life, their perceived social norms may be seriously influenced.
Television is regarded as a significant source of information that plays an influential role in formulating an individuals social reality. As a tool that conveys the simulations of every day life it “may become a part of our social experience and serve as a basis for social judgements such as racial attitudes and ethnic stereotypes” (Fujoka, 52). Stereotypes are explained as widely held beliefs about a particular person or group. Research shows that “television images of minority groups might affect minority members’ self-concept and racial awareness” (Fujoka, 54). The portrayal of minorities on television were deemed by minority groups as a conception of socially existing beliefs toward their racial group. As such, television may have perhaps
A person’s identity is shaped by many different aspects. Family, culture, friends, personal interests and surrounding environments are all factors that tend to help shape a person’s identity. Some factors may have more of an influence than others and some may not have any influence at all. As a person grows up in a family, they are influenced by many aspects of their life. Family and culture may influence a person’s sense of responsibilities, ethics and morals, tastes in music, humor and sports, and many other aspects of life. Friends and surrounding environments may influence a person’s taste in clothing, music, speech, and social activities. Personal interests are what truly set individuals apart. An individual is not a puppet
Within human nature lies this tendency to think that those who come from different backgrounds are nonetheless entirely different from oneself. The lack of understanding of how others live, think, and act are like one’s own hinders opportunities for social groups to build connections based upon their similarities. Partially, human nature is to blame for these generalized social groups which are often labeled by stereotypes. Stereotypes are the results of only telling one story. However, the media typically only broadcast the single stories by showing the differences among society. Thus, it can be concluded that the media should also possess blaming in the problematic outcomes of only one story being
Our identity can sometimes be shaped by the way others see us. As we have seen, the way in which others view us can have some sort of impact on how we see ourselves. There are also other contributing factors such as our years of adolescence, the basic human need of wanting to belong and maturing; all play an equally important part in the forming of our character and who we are. On balance it appears that there is not only one influence in the shaping of our identity, but there are many.