Racial Profiling Cases

Complainant states that in September 2016, he and his family went to Ansonia Morse, LLC, (Ansonia) located at 1550 W. Morse, and submitted an application for a one-bedroom apartment at 1550 W. Morse. Complainant paid the required $50 application fee and Leasing Agent Menchie Maduyag (Maduyag) accepted his application stating that Ansonia’s Manager Estera Cucu would review it. Two days later, Complainant states that submitted the required $300 move-in fee.

Does racial profiling still exist today? I think racial profiling is still used today because not all people agree with being equal.

1. On or about April 5, 2013, Brad walked into Richard's office and there illegally and feloniously assaulted and battered Richard, thereby causing to Richard great pain and suffering.

1. Defendant PhxCap, LLC (referred to below as the “Landlord”), is and at all times mentioned in this complaint was a limited liability company, with its principal place of business located in Encinitas, California. Defendant is the owner of the property located at 1380 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, California, 92109 (referred to below as the “Project”).

The purpose of the paper is to identify, how racial profiling is not a legitimate tool for law enforcement agencies. The definition of the racial profiling is the consideration of race, ethnicity, or national origin by an officer of the law in deciding when and how to intervene in an enforcement capacity (Racial Profiling, 2008). The practice of racial profiling is illegal. Racial profiling violates the fourth and fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The fourth amendment indicates [it goes against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched,

Racial profiling has a strong history in these United States. First, what is racial profiling? Basically, racial profiling is an assumption about something solely based on a person’s race. It may also be a filter through one’s eye. For example, when a police officer decides to only stop African Americans, he is racially profiling; if he decides to exclude all African Americans from any stops he conducts, he is also racially profiling. Racial profiling is a form of discrimination people generally associate with law enforcement. In recent times, allegations of racial profiling have been rampant in the United States, having mainly the African American community as the target. Lately, though, Hispanics have also been the alleged target of racial profiling. Regardless, we can all be victims of racial profiling regardless of our race, and there have been laws written to prevent the profiling, but is it enough?

I hope these words and this moment of truth can serve as some extra motivation to you… That is a quote(tweet) by Kanye West. That tweet serves for what I mean I hope these truths I serve as motivation for this issue to be resolved and that issue is racial profiling and how it shouldn’t be implied in law enforcement or security.

|Carl Freer, solicitor, Tenants Union of NSW for the applicantAshley Stafford of counsel, instructed by Kathryn McDougall of Baker & McKenzie, solicitors

An example of injustice was when I watched my friend get pulled over after leaving the bars in San Jose. He is a persian male and was pulled over immediately after getting into his car. He was asked to perform a breathalyzer test directly after being pulled over without any prior questioning. After passing the test, he was allowed to go as he was our DD for the night. This was an example of racial profiling in my opinion.

The Tecumseh condominium complex is a waterfront condominium complex located at 312 Severn Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland. (Compl. ¶ 1). On September 1, 2016, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) was a tenant in a condominium unit rented to her by Defendant, Tecumseh Condo, LLC (“Tecumseh”). (Compl. ¶¶ 3, 15, 23). On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) filed a four-count complaint in this Court. (Compl.) Notably, only one count—a claim for

Plaintiff further asserts that the Defendant breached its duty of care to her by: (1) “failing to fix a hazardous condition within a reasonable time;” (2) “failing to adequately warn plaintiff of a hazardous condition;” and (3) “otherwise failing to exercise reasonable and due care under the circumstances.” The Plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars, plus interest and costs.

The second argument will be delivered by Beatrice where her account of the occurrences will be reviewed, along with possible claims and remedies available to her. Crucial acts which may be of great use to Beatrice will also be referenced, in order to strengthen her case against the defendant Macgregor hotel.

Respondents state that Complainant filed an application for a three-bedroom unit in 2006 and was placed on the waitlist. Respondents explain that the Building has a limited number of three-bedroom units so it is not unusual that applicants would remain on the waitlist for an extended period. Respondents continually audit the waitlist to ensure that all applicants are properly qualified for and still desire a three-bedroom unit. Respondents state that on November 14, 2014, in response to an audit, Complainant confirmed that she still desired a three-bedroom unit and had a family size of four people. Respondents state that there was no indication that the request for a larger unit was as a reasonable accommodation for Complainant’s son and husband's disability

and Andrea purchased Econo Lodge in 1999 in a non highway location in Boulder, Colorado.  Located in a student residential area, Econo Lodge did not lend itself to drive-by stopovers because of its lack of landscaping, physical amenities etc.  Employee quality and their attitudes were low.  Maintenance and housekeeping were not prepared to provide anything more than a barely acceptable level of guest satisfaction.  The staff they inherited constantly attracted low-life guests.  Which is why the front office was protected by bulletproof glasses.

“Racial profiling punishes the innocent individuals for the past actions of those who look and sound like them. It misdirects crucial resources and undercuts the trust needed between law enforcement and the communities they serve. It has no place in our national discourse, and no place in our nation’s police departments.” - Benjamin Todd Jealous (an American venture capitalist, civic leader, and former president and chief executive officer of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). The definition of racial profiling, another form or racism, according to the ACLU is “the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin,” and also includes “discriminatory omissions on the part of law enforcement as well.” In simpler words, this means that law enforcement might “turn the other cheek” when crime is being committed by a certain group of people. Though racial profiling happens amongst all races and ethnicities, it mostly happens to minorities within the country, according to the multitude of examples of racial profiling of minorities in the United States compared to the majority. One example of discriminatory omissions provided by the ACLU is the idleness of southern sheriffs to help black suspects during times of lynching. A more common day example would be giving one person a ticket