Racial Profiling Pros And Cons

There are tons of cases of Racial Profiling. Now a days many people are being targeted or attacked by racial profiling. Laws are being passed but not every police officer is following up with it. And because of this more and more people are becoming irritated with the government system. Just because a particular person from a particular race does something wrong, everyone from that race is being discriminated by so-called other races. Racial profiling is getting worst by the years go by, it is becoming a hot topic. Ever since the major attack of September 11, 2001 many people have seen Muslims as terrorists. Racial profiling doesn’t just affect Muslims; it affects African Americans and Hispanics. Due to the action of just one individual, and from that individual affects the whole race behind it. It just doesn’t make that person look bad it makes they’re race look as bad as they do. That is why African American, Hispanics, and Muslims are being targeted. Racial profiling negatively impacts society.

We live in a society that has prospered generously over the years. America has opened its doors for so many different people by establishing itself as a free country. Not only have we progressed in technology and economically but we have created our own identity by becoming a free nation in which every individual has the same rights and eligibility as the other. This is the core of our countries success; we are not a nation unified distinctly by a specific race, religion or culture but by the compulsive efforts of our nation’s laws to uphold freedom in every aspect of a civilian’s life. People are not only allowed but encouraged to practice the religion of their choice, eat the food they desire, speak the language they prefer. There is even freedom in the most minute of things such as being able to listen to the music of your choice, these are the laws that promote diversity and strengthen our nation today. Our nation’s identity and prosperity is built upon multiculturalism and ethnic tolerance. However, this was not always the case it has taken many long and brutal years become the stable and versatile country that we are today. Specifically dating back to when this land was first founded and thereafter we see our nation has struggled with conflicts against politics, discrimination, and public affairs up till this very day.

If love has no color, how about justice? Is justice defined by any color in the United States of America, a country that is well known for its diversity and prosperity? Sadly to say, the existence and the usage of the word “stereotype” has raised doubts about justice since it has existed and progressed as part of the American culture for a long time. Stereotype can be classified into many subcategories, one of which is racial profiling. This issue, where authorities target certain individuals based on their racial characteristics, has never ceased. According to many influential claimsmakers, racial profiling has stained the United States by negatively affecting society and disturbing the certainty of justice. It is unconstitutional and

Racial profiling exceeds the legal limits, Latino communities are afraid of going out because they have a higher risk of being arrested, based in the way they look. Ranjana Natarajan a clinical professor and director of the Civil Rights Clinic at The University of Texas School of Law, writes the article, “ Racial Profiling Has Destroyed Public Trust in Police. Cops Are Exploiting Our Weak Law Against It” where she explains how police brutality is against the law but is still happening. Natarajan mentions, “Whatever else we have learned from the recent tragedies of police violence, it is clear that we need comprehensive federal, state and local policies that outlaw racial profiling and rein in police excessive force”. This shows how police

People in law enforcement use race, ethnicity, religion or nationality as a factor in determining if an individual has committed a crime, this is called racial profiling. Many in law enforcement believe that racial profiling is an efficient way of screening someone who is suspected of a crime. They fail to see the problems with profiling someone based on how they look or their backgrounds. Racial profiling is wrong in any circumstance because crime comes from all different types of people, it causes distrust between law enforcement and the people of that community, and it violates citizens constitutional rights.

How often have you immediately made a decision about someone based solely on the color of their skin? Since the September 11 bombing, many people have been targeted by police because of their skin tone. This is called racial profiling, it has become a major problem that many in this country must deal with daily (ACLU, 2017). Even though this is very unconstitutional, implementing a change can be a very challenging thing. Later, I will be telling you about some individual’s stories of racial profiling, why this has become such a problem and how we could change this problem.

Although, it may be true that police behavior, judgment is undistorted by racial discrimination, but on the contrary that contradicts most studies, which reveals that many police officers will confess to: using race as a significant factor in deciding whom to follow when on patrol or who they decide to detain, or search or arrest (MacDonald). Findings from a statewide study by the Steward Research Group show that black and Latino drivers are subjected to searches at significantly higher rates than Anglo drivers in Texas and around the country. "Nationwide leading concern in debates over racial profiling is over racial disparities in the likelihood of being searched during a traffic stop." (Texas).

What is racial profiling? Racial Profiling refers to the ‘discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin’ (American Civil Liberties Union). There are certain races that face racial profiling from law enforcement officials driving or in other important locations. Black races face racial profiling especially when driving; law enforcement officials target black driver for minor traffic violations. Spanish race might be racial profile while walking or driving to search for illegal drugs or guns. Since the attacks of September 11 2001, the Arab race and South Asian race has faced many racial profiling from law enforcement and even regular people for any terrorist attack that is taking place or any immigrant violation.

The banning of the burqa has become an issue in many places, including France. The French Parliament has decided it is time to ban the burqa in public. They believe is a sign of the subjugation and submission of women to males. Some believe it is used to cover up abuse and they also believe it is unfair to the public that citizens cannot see the women’s faces. However it is unfair for these women to be banned from wearing what they choose as just everyone else does.The banning of the burqa should not be allowed because it is discriminatory towards Muslim women and violates their freedom of religion and their freedom to express themselves.

It really get so bad for Muslims that when passing okay through security at the airport and getting on the plane, the pilot having so call authority to request a Muslim to be remove from the plane because of the similarities in looks of the Muslim terrorist that crashed the planes. This was wrong, but in most American eyes felt justified and going along with it for the sake of feeling they would be safe because to them all Muslims at that time were guilty by association.

Is it right to racial profiling someone? Many people did this to other .but i think its wrong because we all human and same no matter how different our race and skin color.

Burqas should be banned in France because, as some people incorrectly claim, it is not a discriminatory ban against Muslim women. In fact, burqas oppress women and cause them many social problems. In 2011, there was a heated legal battle over whether or not banning face-coverings, including burqas, should be allowed in France. The key argument supporting the ban is that face-coverings prevent the identification of a person, which is a security risk and a problem in a society in which we rely on face-to-face communication. Furthermore, burqas oppress women from making their own decisions. All in all, burqas can cause those who wear them to be impeded in their social advances in society, they can be a hazard for security, and they are not always worn for religious reasons.

France should not take away the right to wear burqas away because for some women use it as a “safe line” or as a way to meet men and not be self-conscious of their bodies around others. Or to not to have to worry whether they are dressed modest enough, or that someone will first judge them by their appearance first without getting to know them. Taking the burqa away from someone and corrupting the way Muslim women live is wrong. It will cause women to be further alienated then they already were from the world because they do not want to go in public with their faces showing or their body. But even

On July 13, 2010, France passed a bill which abolished all burqas, headscarves, and helmets. This law applies to those who obscure their faces in public. The people of France and everybody, in general, should not wear a burqa for many reasons. The burqa creates many problems and issues such as safety, domestic violence, and the promotion of segregation. In the senate of France, 246 voted for the banning and only one voted against the banning. The burqa is unhealthy for France in general and should be banned, for information is so gruesome, the reader can tell that it was a reasonable decision in which France took action.

In Indiana, the number of imprisoned African American men is about 395 of the total population of adult male inmates in the state. On the other hand, 27% of the incarcerated females are the African Americans, while 58% of the juveniles’ prison populations include the African Americans (Davis, 2015). Evidently, the arrest and incarceration rate for the blacks in Indiana is considerably high. Regardless of the increasing racial profiling in Indiana, the General Assembly in 2016 forwarded a House Bill that warns against racial profiling. The bill prohibits law enforcement agencies or officers from engaging in any form of racial profiling, including pretextual stops.