Racial Profiling Research Paper

I seriously don't understand what is wrong with some of these officers where they think this type of thing is alright. It takes 4 years for the lawyer to learn the law and become the professionals they are. So why should officers; the people first on the scene require far less to be given their jobs?

Paraphrase: The author stresses how the shooting of a law enforcement officer by an African

Racial profiling exceeds the legal limits, Latino communities are afraid of going out because they have a higher risk of being arrested, based in the way they look. Ranjana Natarajan a clinical professor and director of the Civil Rights Clinic at The University of Texas School of Law, writes the article, “ Racial Profiling Has Destroyed Public Trust in Police. Cops Are Exploiting Our Weak Law Against It” where she explains how police brutality is against the law but is still happening. Natarajan mentions, “Whatever else we have learned from the recent tragedies of police violence, it is clear that we need comprehensive federal, state and local policies that outlaw racial profiling and rein in police excessive force”. This shows how police

Racial profiling affects those in Knott C. county by making people live in fear. Not just Knott C. county , but also throughout the nation. Doubting those kids that grew up in a poverty neighborhood of even making it out alive. Also even doubting them that they will have a future if they do make it out alive. They wake up not knowing if they will actually be who they dream of being one day which “every shot they shoot , they shoot for their dreams” says Coach Rhodes. Not just that , but being racially profiled for how they look , act , live and mostly for who they show to be , not knowing where they really come from.

Racial profiling is apparent within African American and Latinos throughout history and still exists today in the New York City.  African Americans and Latinos in the United States have a different perspective of police, based on personal experience. Racial profiling can be defined as the use of race or ethnicity as the foundation for suspecting someone of having committed a

One may consider how racial profiling began. The term was initially instituted in the 1970's while rebuffing medication traffickers. In 1985, the Drug Enforcement Organization made a system called Operation Pipeline. This system was constituted of cops who were prepared in a particular way to target people who drove in specific ranges in light of their age and race. The well known racial profiling case White versus Williams speaks to this reason, where minority drivers were ceased along the New Jersey Road. Therefore, the American Common Freedoms Union of New Jersey had a noteworthy triumph in its lawful endeavors to end racial profiling when the court declined to reject a case that state authorities acted with conscious lack of interest to

In communities where there are heavy percentages of racial and ethnic minorities, racial profiling can cause a gap between them and law enforcement departments. Communities and officers work better together if they are in a positive relationship. However, when the two parties are at odds with each other due to racial profiling, it diminishes the ability to find criminals and probe crimes and also minimizes belief in these agencies (Head). What racial profiling specifically does is cause a central problem to minority communities: trust. When there is trust between people, organizations, or other groups, there develops the power to cooperate and actually move forward. In a simple racial profiling case, an officer arrests an African American male

Racial profiling is a tool used to target a certain group, majority blacks, by pulling him/her over for reasons other than what the traffic stop should be or not. To the average person who does not experience this will view as a non-issue or not a big deal. But having an experience as a victim of racial profiling can leave a psychological scar for many years, depending on the severity of the traffic stop. The statistics show that these incidents are not random, but shows a systematic pattern of law enforcement misconduct rather it’s coming from the individual officer or the police department, it’s clear that racial profiling has a disparate and degrading impact on blacks. Driving while black (DWB) demonstrates, reflects, and exacerbates important issues we face today when talking or debating problems within that involves the police, criminal justice, the courts and the law.

Racial profiling is a topic that dates back centuries. With it being one of the major issues encountered today, racial profiling is a discriminatory conduct held by law enforcement and the criminal justice system. In my eyes, racial profiling is the use of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or national origin by law enforcement as a factor in deciding whom to investigate, arrest, or detain absent evidence of a specific crime or criminal behavior (Chanin). In today’s world, racial profiling has become a major issue. All too often, minorities are being hauled off to jail because they “fit the profile”. What exactly does it mean for one to “fit the profile”? These people who “fit the profile” are being discriminated against, and many of these people have been targeted out of ignorance. Bottom line is, while making assumptions and generalizing entire communities, racial profiling is a violation of human rights and is outright racist.

What is racial profiling? The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) defines racial profiling as “the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion or national origin” (2005). Do not confuse racial profiling with criminal profiling; criminal profiling is usually practiced by police in which they use a group of characteristics that are associated with crime to target individuals (ACLU, 2005). Examples of racial profiling include using ones race to target specific drivers for traffic violations and pedestrians for illegal contraband; another prime example is the targeting of Muslims, Arabs, and South Asians since 9/11 in regards to minor immigrant violations without any connection to the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon (ACLU, 2005). Without a doubt, racial profiling occurs on a daily basis all over the world; however let’s focus on racial profiling in the United States and specifically right here in our homeland, Michigan. Background & History

Racial profiling is an ever-growing issue in the world. Not growing in that it is becoming more of an issue, but growing in that citizens who are not victims are finally seeing and understanding racial profiling and its role in the criminal justice system, and also victims themselves are becoming more outspoken and encouraged to fight back about the injustices they are facing. The two go hand in hand, as there are more people willing to listen, there are more people willing to speak out. The first and second section of this paper will dedicate itself to understanding and considering the social factors and the legal factors that enable racial profiling to exist in Canada. The third section of this paper will dedicate itself to the discussion

Racial profiling has come to represent one of the latest challenges toward law enforcement agencies in the United States. In America, unfortunately, racial profiling occurs. For instance, NYPD officers stopped about 87 percent of the public that were either black or Latino (Geller, 2014). In addition, approximately the same percentage was not guilty of a crime. In the study by the American Journal of Public Health, young men who encounter numerous police contact or aggressive stops by the police reported that they had more trauma and anxiety symptoms than among young men who had less of these encounters with the police (Geller, 2014). This means that less aggressive invasive tactics are necessary for suspect in order to reduce the possibility

In New York City’s police department report in December 1999, the stop and frisk practices showed to be greatly based on race. In NYC, blacks make up 25.6% of the city’s population, Hispanics 23.7% and whites are 43.4% of NYC population. However, according to the report, 50.6% of all persons stopped were black, 33% were Hispanic, and only 12.9% were white. As you can see, more than half of the individuals who were stopped were black, 62.7% to be exact (ACLU, 2013). In Orange County, California Latinos, Asians and African Americans were more than 90% of the 20,221 men and women in the Gang Reporting Evaluation and Tracking System (ACLU, 2013). Clearly this database record shows racial profiling occurred when the total population in the database made up less than half of Orange County’s population. This is when the California Advisory Committee of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the ACLU stepped in. One other instance of racial profiling I’d like to discuss occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona. A court ruled in May 2013 that “sheriff Joe Arpaio’s routine handling of people of Latino descent amounted to racial and ethnic profiling”; according to CNN, the sheriff’s office had a history of targeting vehicles with those having darker skin, examining them more strictly and taking them into custody more often than others (CNN, 2014). Judge Murray Snow ordered a monitor to oversee retraining in this

“One. The police stop blacks and Latinos at rates that are much higher than whites. In New York City, where people of color make up about half of the population, 80% of the NYPD stops were of blacks and Latinos. When whites were stopped, only 8% were frisked (Quigley, 2010).” Police stops are a very common effect on society. It isn’t fair that police don’t hold everyone accountable the same way. Not every cop is that way but there are that selected few who still have that racist mindset and hold it against innocent people. It’s no secret that in New York especially, there is a lot of crime and gang activity produced by different minority groups in the city. However, The facts does not provide a good reason that in routine stops are people of color targeted and frisked down compared to

Just what is racial profiling? Racial profiling is a law enforcement and security agency practice that encourages officers to stop, search, and investigate people based on race, ethnicity, nationality or religion. While racial profiling is most commonly committed against ethnic minorities, many instances of racial profiling occur in reaction to specific crimes, making any racial or cultural group subject to more intensive scrutiny by the authorities. (ebscohost.com) This is what I think bout racial profiling, it like it occurs when the police targets someone for investigation on the basis of that person's race, national origin, or ethnicity. Examples are the use of race to determine which drivers to stop for minor traffic