preview

Racism In To Kill A Mockingbird

Satisfactory Essays

In 1865, slavery became illegal. Though, America was unsure of the long-lasting problem that was to come: segregation. Churches, Schools, and other public environments became “white only”. Then, in 1866, the first Civil Rights Act was passed. This act forbids the previous acts of segregation, and in some cases, racism. Unfortunately, eleven years after, the compromise of 1877 was passed; which then put an end to segregation being illegal. Since then, segregation has again been prohibited and stayed this way. Still, many acts of racism/segregation between blacks and whites have been happening; especially in the court of law. In America, segregation/ racism has been an important part of history for centuries; yet, there are court cases that …show more content…

In this novel, the court case and Atticus’s actions prove that around the 1930’s the court automatically assumes a black man guilty when ruling against a white man. If Tom Robinson had not gotten shot, he had a very low probability of winning the case. He was physically unable to strangle Mayella Ewell due to his early hand injury, but because he was black the court did not even take this into consideration. The court barely payed attention to his case, and what he had to say solely because of his color. Another example of racism/ segregation in the court of law is Plessy versus Ferguson case. This case started when in 1891, a group of young black men from New Orleans formed the “Citizens’ Committee to test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law”. The group then raised money and hired Albion W. Tourgeé, a Republican author and politician, to be their lawyer. Eventually, on May 15th, 1892, the Louisiana State Supreme Court decided that the Separate Car Law was, indeed, unconstitutional. Then on June 7th, 1892 Homer Plessy, seated himself in the white compartment. Plessy was ⅞ white or, in other words, a mulatto. Even being less than 13% black, Plessy was still not allowed to be in the “white only” part of the train. He was then arrested and charged for breaking state law. Tourgeé argued against this stating that “the law requiring ‘separate but equal accommodations’ was unconstitutional.” Finally, John H.

Get Access