Radicalization And Disengaging Essay

Sometimes, the motives for disengagement can be psychological, such as being in disagreement with an aspect of the organization, or physical such as the calling of a ceasefire or being apprehended by authorities (Cantor 2009, 264). They can also be voluntary such as an overriding personal issue preventing the continuation of membership into the group, or involuntary such as a person being forced to leave the group (Cantor 2009, 264). Whatever the reason one disengages, it is not an easy decision to be made. There can be a plethora of risks and penalties involved for leaving the organization. There is almost no way out (Bovenkirk 2011, 265). Once someone is in and has gained knowledge of the group, that knowledge must be kept secret and someone leaving the group poses a threat to that secret being released (Bovenkirk 2011,

Jeffery Ian Ross (1999) differs from earlier research suggesting that both political and social factors can lead to a criminology of terrorism. Terrorism involves violence but criminal behavior is a result of

Although the threat posed by foreign terrorist organizations is often foremost in the public consciousness as a result of al-Qaeda's attack on September 11th, 2001, the threat from domestic terror groups remains a central concern of those responsible for homeland security. In fact, while the United States has not suffered from another foreign attack in the decade since 9/11, research by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, along with non-governmental organizations, has found that the number of domestic terror groups has increased, a trend only exacerbated by the economic recession (U.S. Department of Justice, 2009, Domestic Terrorism). While there are a wide variety of individual groups and ideologies, most domestic terror groups falls into one of three broad categories: religious extremism, white supremacy, and anti-government and separatists movements, including the militia movement. Examining these domestic terror groups in greater detail will aid in better understanding the full spectrum of threats considered by homeland security personnel.

Radicalization have various sources, from reactionary hatred of the freedom world, involvement in antigovernment militia movements in the U.S, to even mental illnesses. The main focus in this paper is to focus on Jihad-based radicalization in the prison system because according the FBI these groups are the biggest potential threats to American security. It is important to recognize all of the factors of why Americans are radicalizing in the prison system. First off, in prison, individuals associate themselves with other individuals or groups to protect themselves. They also tend to associate with those that are similar to them; share background similarities, family, ethnicity, religion, etc. Ever since 911, the government has increased its economic spending to combat and prevent domestic terrorism. In October 2003, the U.S Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, technology, and homeland security held a hearing, that warned the threats of Islamic radicalization in the U.S prisons. The subcommittee concluded that radicalization in prisons is a real threat and “prisons are producing a formidable enemy within. Eight years later, in June 2011, the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security held another series of hearings on the issue. In his opening remarks, Committee Chairman Peter King claimed that prisons have created "an assembly line of radicalization," which poses a major threat to the safety and security of the

The use of terrorism started in 1795 relating to the reign of terror leaded by the French Government. The reason people become terrorist is because they see it as their only choice or is a sign for defending their religion. “The personal pathway model suggests that terrorists came from a selected, at risk population, who have suffered from early damage to their self-esteem,” (psychologist Eric D. Shaw). This explains how young adults are becoming terrorist to find themselves, also because they are not happy with who they are. Terrorist technology has changed over the course.

“Stairs narrow toward the top. It becomes harder to turn back with each step” (Kershaw, 2010). As said before, there is not a “cookie cutter” definition of what creates a terrorist. One thing is very evident, the radicalization process of an individual is complex, diverse, and is often comprised of idiosyncratic characteristics.

Terrorism has been significantly on the rise over the past several years, making it one of the major concerns for governments and security organizations. The identity of terrorists and the activities perpetrated by them have been associated with certain races, religious affiliations and other geographical parameters, with little concern to understand the development of these characteristics among humanity. Most individuals have classified terrorists as being members of specific races and hence developed fallacious theories that associate terrorism with genetic makeup and other mental problems.

terrorist groups from upper-income countries are much more likely to be left-wing or nationalist and much less likely to be motivated by religion” (Jones).

Comparing the terrorists to gang members. The gang does exactly do what terrorists do. They despair and recruiting vulnerable young men, and control their communities through brutal violence. We don’t call them terrorists because they don’t have a specific vendetta against America as a whole. So, they can always be classified as terrorists. The unlawful use of violence against people or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of the political or social objective. Anybody who has grown up in a neighborhood knows that gang members use force or violence against people or property to intimidate or coerce the civilian population. Gang banging can be compared to terrorism. Some people believe that the two activities have common goals and results. These groups turn to violence to obtain what they need. The following research will explore this premise, as well as point out where the two groups differ. Sometimes the government will try every means possible to obtain the release of hostages without making concessions. It is a widely held belief that making concessions to terrorists that will encourage more terrorism. Sometimes terrorists will feel that their actions have obtained results. The United States tries to learn about the goals and ideologies of terrorists, it does so only to better identify and apprehend them. Educators search for ways to keep students from joining gangs. Terrorism is a well thought out

Viewed as a reverse process, the term de-radicalization describes the process by which an individual changes their cognitive view of the world around them. What was once troubling to them and led to their adoption of violent extremism has changed and as a result they see the world, or their corner of it, in a new light. The process of de-radicalization can be viewed as the first step toward returning to their previous life. This often leads to disengagement, or an individual’s desire to no longer take part in the physical act of terrorism. The de-radicalization and disengagement process can begin in a number of ways including the realization that life under terrorist rule is not what it appeared or one’s unwillingness to martyr themselves for a terrorist

I found that in my research there were many different definitions of terrorism giving it different personalities to conduct these practices. Another conclusion that is drawn is the fact that terrorist cant be studied up close and asks questions up front in fear of the researchers’ lives. I also found a few common reasons why they have gone to terrorism and how it can affect the type of terror they produce among people. The most common thought of terrorism is blowing up yourself and others with you this is called suicide bombing. I majorly found that the profiling of terrorist was usually just as much sociology as psychology and has a long way to go to get true solid answers on the profile of a terrorist.

Radicalization is defined as the process of becoming more extreme, or regressing away from the center of a spectrum, in belief and thusly action. This term is now more modernly used to describe violent religious radicals in the religion of Islam. Radicalization however, can occur in any system that contains more than one concrete set of thought. From the two party system of U.S, to the split of sikhs and shia muslim ethnic groups, radicalization to either side, in example, liberal to conservative and sikh to shia, is vehemently dangerous and ought to be avoided. Moderation, on the other hand, is the trait of remaining in the center of a spectrum of thought, taking no personal stakes or dedication to either side. In politics moderates are

Terrorism is used around the world to create fear and influence the public on political views (Siegel, 489). There are four views of terrorism including the psychological view, socialization view, ideological view, and the alienation view. A religious terrorist would most likely fit under the ideological view. In this view the terrorist feels the need to change a wrong opinion and believes that, because they are sacrificing themselves for something they believe so strongly in, it justifies the damage and harm done to innocent people (Siegel, 490). They use terror to create fear in anyone who opposes them and attract followers to their religion. In short, terrorism is widely used for political

As you might expect, the disengagement process is not an easy one and much like the process for radicalization there is a process for successfully disengaging. Leaving is not an easy process as there are still obligations that the person may feel pressured to fulfill and of course, the fear of consequences for no longer wanting to be a part of the organization and leaving with the knowledge they have of the group. When a person first becomes involved with the organizations the perceived rewards that are promised to the individual provide a huge motivation to engage and create bonds with fellow members, however, when the reality sets in that the rewards are not as great as one anticipated or the actual amount of work

This is a peer-reviewed article that will be one of the primary foundation source for the research paper. As indicated in the week four outline, it is incredibly important to understand that in order to effectively combat extreme radicalization and terrorism in general, you need to understand what creates a terrorist. After all, not all terrorists are just born that way. This article supports that point effectively. It is important to realize that profiling is a terroist is near impossible because according to Leistedt (2013), “research has not found a ‘pattern’ of psychologically among terrorists.” (p. 22)