Rainsford, is in fact, a man of reason. His thought process while being hunted and his ability to recall beneficial knowledge from past experiences effectively prove this point. In the midst of being hunted Rainsford kept a near-constant collectiveness about him. When tested in paragraph 9 on page thirty-one Rainsford reminds himself to stay calm, for it annihilated the playing field between him and the General (l,cI). Additionally, Rainsford uses his knowledge of past hunts to deceive and kill one of the dogs and to injure General Zaroff. Both of the points previously stated prove that Rainsford is a man of logic. The first being that his thought process is helping him gain an advantage over the General. This would seem logical given the
I think Rainsford has learned many things from his experience. For example, I do not think Rainsford will be hunting for a while, after being hunted by Zaroff. I knew Rainsford was hunted because in the text Zaroff said “we will hunt-you and I” I think Rainsford has learned that there is more than one meaning for the word “game”. I also think Rainsford has a different point of view now on hunting. What I mean by this is that in the beginning of the story Rainsford thinks animals as second class compare to humans. I knew this because in the text Rainsford said, “The world is made up of two classes-the hunters and the huntees.” I think his view has changed since he was hunted this time. I also think Rainsford has learned how to survive in the wild because of his experience on the island. For example, Zaroff pushed Rainsford to his limits by hunting him, this made Rainsford more committed to kill Zaroff by setting up traps. I know it will be different from this time on because what Zaroff put Rainsford threw has taught him a life lesson (how to survive in the
Rainsford was stuck. All the General wants in return is for him to pretend that he doesn’t exist in this cruel world. Like a character in a fantasy book.
This quote shows that Rainsford is insane because during this part, he is saying that he wants to hunt something that can reason with him, and only one animal can do that. That animal is a human. During the story, General Zaroff is also competitive. He shows that he is competitive when he fights to win the game over the humans. He always believes he will win. “If my quarry eludes me for three whole days, he wins the game. If I find him”... “he loses.” (Connell
Rainsford is not a hero due to his egocentric attitude and hypocritical behavior. After Rainsford hears the hounds and sees Ivan and General Zaroff approaching, he then creates a trap to kill General Zaroff. When Rainsford hears the footsteps stop, he looks back at the trap and “[sees] in the shallow valley that General Zaroff was still on his feet. But Ivan was not. The knife, driven by the recoil of the springing tree, had not wholly failed” (Conell 14). This quote proves that Rainsford does not obtain the qualities of an altruistic and civil being. This is due to Rainsford wanting to kill General Zaroff for his own survival. Furthermore, once Rainsford accidentally kills Ivan, he swims away in refuge from General Zaroff.
Rainsford is an intelligent man. Early in the story, “Rainsford remembered the shots. They had come from the right, and he doggedly swam in that direction” (34). Rainsford had just fallen in the water,
First, rainsford is adventurous man because when he was in the forest getting chased by zaroff. “Whenever rainsford gets to go own a hunting trip he goes to some other place to hunt and that is why he is adventurous( page 1,2).” Rainsford was adventurous because of all of the things he was able to do and survive. Rainsford is Adventurous because he is able to survive and stay away from zaroff. Whenever rainsford was begins chased by zaroff rainsford was climbing a tree to sleep but when he got to the top he saw that zaroff was right under the
Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. For instance General Zaroff said “Your brain against mine, Your woodcraft against mine.” (Connell 6). This shows that General Zaroff gives right to rainsford to try and outsmart him and try to win by surviving. If rainsford outsmarts him then he will get the victory or he can do what Zaroff wanted to do to him which was kill him. Also Rainsford disagreed when Zaroff told him about the hunting game. “No,General,”he said “I will not hunt.” Then Zaroff basically said he had to or ivan will kill him.(Connell 9).This quote means that Rainsford did not like the idea that he had to stay in a jungle and
Around 1903 when my parent's died to survive, my brother, Andrew, and I began to perform a musical act on the streets of Chattanooga. I sang and my brother accompanied me on the guitar, often in front of the White Elephant Saloon. In 1912, when Clarence my older brother returned to Chattanooga, he persuaded the managers of his troupe, Lonnie and Cora Fisher, to give me an audition. Consequently, I was hired as a dancer with the Moses Stokes Company, to perform in a show that included the Mother of the Blues, Ma Rainey. Intriguing rumors surround our meeting—legend has it that Ma Rainey literally kidnapped me, that she and her husband forced me to tour with their show, teaching me in the process how to sing the blues. Some rumors say we had
He went through a traumatizing thing but he still stayed strong. He never quit. He persevered and stayed strong. He found a way to calm himself down. He calms himself down by promising to never touch a gun again. And when he found out he killed his brother he showed determination by promising not to touch a gun. And he also showed enthusiasm, because he really felt like that decision to not touch a gun was the right thing. So he had passion for what he was doing. He supported himself and that is how he got through his adversity. In “The Most Dangerous Game” it states that, “Rainsford knew he could do one of two things. He could stay where he was and wait. That was suicide. He could flee. That was postponing the inevitable. For a moment he stood there, thinking. An idea that held a wild chance came to him, and, tightening his belt, he headed away from the swamp” (Connell 21). It also says “They would be on him any minute now. His mind worked frantically. He thought of a native trick he had learned in Uganda. He slid down the tree. He caught hold of a springy young sapling and to it he fastened his hunting knife, with the blade pointing down the trail; with a bit of wild grapevine he tied back the sapling. Then he ran for his life. The hounds raised their voices as they hit the fresh scent. Rainsford knew now how an animal at bay feels. He had to stop to get his breath. The baying of the hounds stopped abruptly, and Rainsford's heart stopped too. They must have reached
Reason does not emerge as an important value until the central characters realize that it is absurd for others to put across particular attitudes. Rainsford is reluctant to accept that it is wrong for him to kill animals and he simply sees his actions as a sport. Similarly, Tessie considers that it would be impossible for her to leave her home-town before getting the chance to visit the local store. This demonstrates that these two individuals fail to see matters from the perspective of someone who is threatened by his or her own actions. Even with this, Rainsford seems to be more cerebral when considering matters from this point of view, taking into account that he does not hesitate to express his horror at the thought of hunting human beings. In contrast, Tessie believes that it is very
During the story, Rainsford is also smart because he new what he was doing when he was in the middle of the game. My second quote is “The world is made up of two classes - the hunters and the huntees” said by Rainsford on page 60 This shows that he is smart because
First of all, rainsford shows the reader that he is very knowledgeable this is shown later in the book when the narrator explains
So, Rainsford is civilized in many ways. Ways including this quote, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.” Said by General Zaroff. He in fact does hunt. But that doesn’t mean he just hunts animals. It makes you think. But, think about it, I mean it is still called hunting and he is civilized because of that fact. Some supporting details would include how Rainsford refused to kill another person. Not including the fact that he had killed Zaroff. But at the beginning of the story or around the middle it shows how Rainsford refuses to kill another actual human being. Also, even though Rainsford will kill animals, he still has a slight sense of humanity because he doesn’t want to take another man’s life unless he felt as if he needed too. And, in this case he did need too because of he didn’t kill General Zaroff he would have
The dynamic character Rainsford is highly contradictory. Rainsford doesn’t agree with killing human. “ I wanted the ideal animal to hunt ,” explain the general. So Rainsford said,“ What are the attributes of an ideal quarry?” and the answer was of course it must have courage, cunning, and all of above