Raising Of The Participation Age (Rpa)

Some individuals might think that young teens are easily swayed by what they hear and see as well as lacking the maturity needed to cast a meaningful vote. But in fact, incorporating this law of being under the age of 18, and having young teens vote will increase the chances of innovation in our society, it could lead elections in the direction of being more successful, and more voices of the society would be heard and recognized. We are moving forward in society and the first step to positive change would be lowering the voting age.

In conclusion the difference between age of the worker have great influence to increase some company, and their performance in work. The worker at the age of 50 is the best worker who should be encouraged to remain in paid employment including their spirit, health and performance, they can work harder than the age up to 60 and work without need some lobar or guardian to do their jobs, because they are still have a good condition to do their

The good news is most young people are achieving national minimum standards for reading, writing and numeracy, a fully engaged in study or work, and have strong support networks. This allows for a healthy lifestyle as education enables people to use their knowledge to make smart and informed decisions in regard to their lifestyle. Education also encourages people to get jobs, which generate income, which they can in turn spend on health services to better certain dimensions of their health. Educations has equipped students with the ability

Also to note on paragraph 4 of "Keep the Voting Age at 18" on the last sentence states: "We should not add the least engaged part of our population to electorate.". It's stating that the younger generation wouldn't care about voting in their time because they are only putting

In the United States the voting age currently is 18 years old and now there are those that wish to lower the age to 16. If the goal is to increase the percentage of the pouplation voting there are better ways of doing so rather than lowering the voting age two years. Doing so would only be waste of time, energy, and resources.

have enough employers under the age of 35, as the American society is aging (The Legacy of the 1965 Immigration Act, 1995).

In the 26th amendment the phrase“ Old enough to fight, old enough to vote” became a slogan for a youth voting right movement. There was a controversy about lowering the age to vote from 21 to 18 because of military reasons, so president Franklin D. Roosevelt lowered the voting age to 18 for the youth to be involved in helping America. But today there is controversy about decreasing the voting age even lower. Lowering the voting age can affect everyone in negative ways. They are still too young to make mature decisions about life especially deciding the future of the country. Lowering the age gives the responsibility for impulsive, immature kids to choose the fate of the future president; therefore, lowering the age thirteen will not benefit the country.

favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment”. This means everyone young and especially older people can seek employment regardless of their age.

Today I will be writing about why I believe the voting age should be lowered. People all over the US have had very mixed feelings about this law. Many people disagree, and state that the voting age should actually be higher than it is now. Others strongly disagree and think it should be lowered, I am one of those other people. No matter how you feel about this, as an American, as a person, you have the right to an opinion. Many people state that allowing people under the age of 16 to vote would lower the voting rate, I politely disagree. Allowing even more people to vote is not going to lower the rate of voters. It is only logical, in my opinion, that it would increase

When it comes to the idea of lowering the voter age, I cant say much on experiance. Being I have only had about one chance to vote myself. Though id have to say lowering the voting age to 16 is a huge mistake.

Firstly, Young people have time and energy and are at right age to enjoy their life to the maximum. They have an advantage to see life in a very optimistic angle with no fear of failure. So their stakes are high to try everything in life and to make the best use of time. Also, they have maximum time to explore the opportunities to enjoy as they are not tied with job and family responsibilities. For instance, when I was young and doing my studies, apart from school or college hours, I used to

Individuals in this age group could maintain wellness by eating healthy, attending church, doing some physical activity and spending time with their family. They can still live a happy life worry free and not feel abandon. They can find other ways to use their time, which could benefit them and help us, if they wanted to. According to Baltes as cited by Stites and Gypsy (2010), selection, optimization, and compensation are the key processes to a successful development in this age

Should we lower the voting age. Will it make an impact on participation in our countrie. Will the younger citizens be more intristed in politics, or will it increase our non voter percentages. I think that we should decrease the age of voters.

     By making a healthy business case for age diversity, many employers have driven significant change within their organization. The business case is based on a simple premise; people are living longer than ever before and are having fewer children. As a result the population is aging. From an employment perspective, the dramatic drop in numbers of young people

Aging population can be used as an advantage to increase economic rates growth by keeping them employed as long as possible (Nankervis et al. 2006, p.55). People who are working in a knowledge fields may increase their performance with age, however for more physical positions there is an opposite possibility of low performance with increasing age (Patrickson & Ranzijn, 2006). Consequently, specific jobs may have lack of professional employees. For example by separating workers and using older workers as experience type that can teach and train young employees, as well as use their knowledge will benefit organization in different departments. Also by using younger workers as routine workers or in more physical positions that are hard to perform for older employees will give them opportunity to earn more experience and will keep older employees working as well (Patrickson & Ranzijn, 2006). It is necessary for human resources to distribute their workforce accordingly and to provide required training for their young and old employees.