Raising Toddlers

There is a debate of whether or not the legal driving age should be lowered. This can effect citizens because there will be younger people driving. Some people think that younger people shouldn’t be driving. I believe that the legal age for driving should be lowered because people should learn early, the age is too high and they have more time to learn with their parents.

The big debate as to whether the legal driving age should be raised to eighteen is an ongoing issue. There are both arguments for and against this matter. Younger drivers, as well as old ones, can cause many life-threatening accidents; therefore, raising the minimum driving age could significantly reduce the number of accidents. The accident rates can be lowered considerably if the legal driving age is bumped up to eighteen. This would mean that no more kids could get hurt or worse, killed in a car accident.

Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. The Virginia state legislature is considering raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18. If the state raises the age to drive, kids would start depending on their parents to take them places. The parents would be chauffeuring their kids to places like school, work, and so on. I think raising the age to drive is a bad idea because the kids don't have to depend on the parents as much, it can teach the kids responsibility and freedom, and it can allow the kids to get jobs without their parents.

The are many things that back up the fact that the GDL program is better than teens waiting until they are 18 to drive. One thing is that it allows teen to get more experience at driving by making them have to get a certain amount of time driving

According to the passage, the GDL program generally allows teens to earn driving privileges gradually or slowly. Example, GDLs allow 16-year-olds to drive only during certain daylight hours, which would be much safer than driving at night, and a better way than raising the driving age. When the teens gain more experience, they earn more privileges, which I think makes sense. According to the passage, opponents of GDLs say that the license is ineffective and needlessly complicate teens’ lives. Think about it, the system is very complicated, but it’s important. Since this system or program can save many lives, and even decrease teen car

In addition, there would be less accidents. GLs would make teens drive in daylight hours

Considering the leading cause of death in U.S and worldwide teenagers is motor vehicle accidents, does Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) laws help reduce the number of motor vehicle accidents in teenagers compared to those providing novice drivers with full unrestricted license?

Raising the age was not an idea based on opinions. Over the years many people and organizations have recorded facts and statistics to support their claims. An example shown on CBS News, shows that “More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration” (CBS NEWS). One huge influence on the topic was the Insurance Institutes for Highway Safety, they created a seventeen page memo filled with statistics and examples of how raising the age is a necessity. This is not the first attempt to use statistics to support the appeal to raise the age. The Seattle Times states, “The example the institute uses most prominently is New Jersey, the only state with a minimum driver's license age of 17. The report cited a study from 1992-96 in which the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year-olds was 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut, which had a minimum driver's license age of 16 and 4 months” (Willette). Overall the argument that raising the age will result in less teen deaths while driving is highly justified. There are frequent examples and a huge amount of research that proves that younger drivers are more likely to cause harm or damage than an older, more experienced driver.

The first reason I think that changing the driving age will not make the road safer is the fact that after we get our permit we either drive three months or six months with a guardian in the car. Those three or six months will train you to become a safer driver and teach you to make smarter decisions. Most teens in this time period will take a drivers education course which offers up- to- date safe driving and defensive driving information. The classroom portion teaches driving laws and regulations, road signs and traffic signals, and much more. The behind

The organization recommends the Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) for young people. This is a method that has proven to decrease teen's driving crash rate by 20 to 40 percent. This method works by allowing young drivers to increase their driving experience, while decreasing the common risks teens face when driving, such as nighttime driving and distractions that happen when carrying teen passengers. Car crashes are the number 1 cause of death for teenager drivers and the problem is because they don't wear seat belts, struggle with speeding, and their teen passengers serve as a distraction. GDL allows teen drivers to only drive with supervision or with immediate licensure, teens may drive unsupervised, but with restrictions, such as, without

If the age that a driver can legally get behind the wheel in a vehicle is increased, doing so won’t change the ability one has to drive. Most crashes occur because of inexperience and bad judgement, all of which are teachable. The main way to learn how to drive is to actually drive a car. Increasing legal age is

With the GDL’s you would you would have the same amount of freedom at safer times like in the morning not at night. Yes, teenagers would have to be driving with their parents’ so you are not as free; however, it is all for their safety and at least they get more driving time than waiting until they are 18. Therefore, if you want some driving time and you do not want to wait until you are 18, you would want

Raising drinking age will decrease the congestion of cars on the road. In an article from BBC according to researchers at the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, congestion in the 83 largest urban areas in the United States caused more than 2,200 premature deaths in 2010 and added $18 billion to public health costs. In raising the age in the driving it would improve the environment in decreasing the amount of smog in the air. The reduction of cars on the road promotes better health for everyone. The less automobiles and more responsible teens on the road become safer for pedestrians and society. Teens get easily distracted and are careless of their

As teenagers get older, they mature, which allows them to make better decisions. Increasing the driving age to 18 could decrease the number of accidents that happen such as racing, texting, goofing around, etc. In the legal side, it would make things a lot easier if an accident occurs because everyone would be an adult, and the court system could have an easier time with the case.

The legal driving age should be raised to eighteen-years-old. Several states of the U.S, as well as other countries, established the driving age to 18, due to accidents statistics; studies validate that adolescent’s driving record at 18 years old, showed fewer collisions than younger (Lund 28). The young are negligent, prone to dart on risky situations, talking on the phone while driving, texting, or listening to loud music, behaviors that trigger teenager’s accidents. At the age of 18, young people demonstrate responsibility; consequently, responsible drivers. “More than 5,000 teenagers die each year in car accidents…Although most teenagers don't like the idea of waiting longer to get their licenses, raising the driving age to 17 or 18 would