preview

Random Student Drug Testing (RSDT) Essay

Decent Essays

What is drug testing? Drug testing is an examination of biologic material such as urine, hair, saliva, or sweat to detect the presence of specific drugs and determine prior drug use. Student random drug testing programs, RSDT, is increasingly common (Edwards). RSDT can help identify the students who are already abusing illicit drugs. Yet most schools only drug test the students, when they should also be drug testing the teachers and staff. Illicit drug use interferes with the ability to learn, affects other students learning and disrupts the teaching environment (Random).

Although drug testing at first glance seems like a good idea, it may not be the best decision for every circumstance. Drug testing in high schools will not do very …show more content…

Any person doing extracurricular activities are less likely to abuse drugs or engage in any other dangerous behavior. They will most likely, also stay in school, earn higher grades, and achieve their goals in life (Verma). What are the legal side effects of drug testing in schools? In court cases concerning drug testing in schools, the focus has been on the legality of drug testing. Specifically, the courts have grappled with balancing the individual student’s right to privacy versus the school’s responsibility to provide a safe, drug-free school environment. Relatively little concern has been given to the effectiveness of drug testing for prevention or cessation, with effectiveness often being assumed.

One of the earliest cases involving drug testing in schools was Schaill v. Tippecanoe
School Corporation. The Tippecanoe school district required random drug testing for athletes, which was contested by two students. The United States District Court deemed the policy constitutional because the school district had a prior problem with illicit drug use among student athletes, and the drug-testing policy clearly stated that a positive drug test would not lead to suspensions or expulsions from school. Instead, students would be referred to counseling. Parents and students were also made aware of the policy and were required to sign a consent form. This case argued that participation in school athletics was a privilege, not a right, in school (Yamaguchi).

Vernonia

Get Access